Court : Karnataka
..... the rank of lt. colonel. on 17.07.2015 the petitioner was transferred from 15, infantry division, ordinance unit-amritsar station to head quarters, karnataka and kerala sub-area. 5. having obtained prior permission of the station commander to move to the bengaluru station along with his family, on 09. ..... provision of accommodation and allied services and recovery of quartering charges from service officers except those entitled to defence pool accommodation in delhi and new delhi controlled by the chief administrative officer, ministry of defence are contained in the succeeding paragraphs." therefore, the sao provides "rules" governing the accommodations and ..... departmental authorities." [ref. to m/s indo-afghan agencies ltd. (supra)]. 17. admittedly, the regulations were framed under section 192 of the army act. thus, the regulations are a subordinate piece of legislation. regulation 5 of the regulations mentions different constituents of the army headquarters. the said provision also .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... learned industrial tribunal, while keeping the aforesaid serial applications filed under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947(for short, the act ) read with rule 61(2) of the industrial disputes (karnataka rules) 1957, as pending, itself suo-motu raised a preliminary issue and held against the petitioner management that the ..... or objections filed before the learned industrial tribunal against the aforesaid serial applications filed by the petitioner management under section 33(2) (b) of the act, about holding a preliminary enquiry within the domestic enquiry held against them and there is no such statutory requirement in the standing orders or bye-laws ..... shivramappa & others :32. :23. in the present case, this court finds that instead of exercising the jurisdiction under section 33(1)(b) of the act, even though the dismissal on the ground of respondents workmen being found guilty of unauthorized absence, even though a matter not connected with the dispute pending before the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... learned industrial tribunal, while keeping the aforesaid serial applications filed under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short, 'the act') read with rule 61(2) of the industrial disputes (karnataka rules) 1957, as pending, itself suo motu raised a preliminary issue and held against the petitioner management that the ..... or objections filed before the learned industrial tribunal against the aforesaid serial applications filed by the petitioner-management under section 33(2)(b) of the act, about holding a preliminary enquiry within the domestic enquiry held against them and there is no such statutory requirement in the standing orders or bye- ..... with such court or tribunal, the said action can be taken against the respondents workmen. 16. it would be proper to quote section 33 of the act hereunder: "33. conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of proceedings. (1) during the pendency of any conciliation proceeding .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and the government will make a sufficient provision in the scheme itself to avoid inconvenience being caused to the travelling public." 9. in the case of 'north west karnataka road transport corporation, hubli vs. durgamba motors, kundapura and others reported in ilr 1999 kar 2464, the learned single judge of this court held thus: "14. ..... the case of h.c. narayanappa [supra]. 4. learned counsel placed reliance on the judgment of the tribunal in smt. sujatha.v.shetty and others vs. road traffic accident, dk, mangalore and others in appeal nos.253, 342 of 1992 and connected matters, to point out that it was the specific stance of the ksrtc ..... . the tribunal misconstrued the notification and dismissed the appeals. 5. per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended that section 104 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 ['act', for short] contemplates restriction on grant of permits in respect of a notified area or notified route. in terms of the said section, where a scheme .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... provision in the scheme itself to avoid inconvenience being caused to the travelling public. 9. in the case of north west karnataka road transport corporation, hubli vs. durgamba motors, kundapura and others reported in ilr1999kar2464 the learned single judge of this court ..... 4. learned counsel placed reliance on the judgment of the tribunal in smt. sujatha.v.shetty and others vs. road traffic accident, dk, mangalore and others in appeal nos.253, 342 of 1992 and connected matters, to point out that ..... by its chairman the secretary regional transport authority, haveri-581110 the m.d., n.w.k.r.t.c., by senior divisional controller haveri the m.d., k.s.r.t.c., shanthinagar, bangalore-27. respondents (by sri vijayakumar a. patil, aga for ..... dismissed the appeals.5. per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended that section 104 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 [ act , for short]. contemplates restriction on grant of permits in respect of a notified area or notified route. in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 2010, 212/2014, 23/2015, 124/2015 and 219/2016, for the offences punishable under section 4(1)(a)(c) of the karnataka lotteries and prize competitions control and tax act, 1951. that some of the cases are pending trial and in one of the cases, the detenue is acquitted and in another case ..... the periyapattana police station limits of periyapattana town of mysuru district under section 3(2) of karnataka prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers drug offenders, gamblers, goondas, (immoral traffic offenders slum-grabbers and video or audio pirates) act 1985. ref. 1. report of the superintendent of police. mysuru district no/dcrb/misc( ..... @ jackie suresh ahmed, s/o.late thammaiah, who has been detained under the provisions of karnataka prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers, drug offenders, gamblers, goondas, immoral traffic offenders and slum- grabbers act, 1985 (hereinafter, called as the "act" for the sake of brevity). 2. according to the petitioner, the detenue was taken into .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... wife of the detenue - althaf, s/o.abdul khader. he has been detained under the provisions of karnataka prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers, drug offenders, gamblers, goondas, immoral traffic offenders and slum- grabbers act, 1985 (hereinafter called as the "act" for the sake of brevity). 2. the second respondent - commissioner of police, mangalore city, has ..... continue his criminal activities which are detrimental to the maintenance of public order. as the ordinary laws have failed to control his criminal tendencies it has become imperative to detain him under the act. 5. the order of detention which was approved by the state government on 30/04/2016 was served on the ..... detenue would continue to indulge in anti social activities, which is detrimental to public order. that it is difficult to control the activities of the detenue under the ordinary law and hence, the act has been invoked. 14. as already noted, the detention order has been passed when the detenue is in judicial .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the date of publication of preliminary notification. this result will ensure no matter whether the acquisition proceedings had been initiated under the land acquisition act or under the karnataka industrial areas development act, as long as the intention behind the legislation is to provide just and fair compensation by introducing a deeming clause that old acquisition proceedings ..... by law to be necessary for the purpose of defense or for the prosecution of war" and entry 52 of the same lists provides for "industries, the control of which by the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest." the issue of considering the entries and the concept of ..... parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war. entry 52 of the union list relates to industries, the control of which by the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest. the establishment, growth and development of industries in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... constitution of india praying to a]. declare that the provisions of section 3[1]. of chapter ii and provisions of sections 28 to 31 of the karnataka industrial areas development act 1966 [karnataka act no.18/1966]. as unconstitutional being repugnant and inconsistent with the provisions of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement ..... by parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war. entry 52 of the union list relates to industries, the control of which by the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest. the establishment, growth and development of industries in the ..... by law to be necessary for the purpose of defense or for the prosecution of war and entry 52 of the same lists provides for industries, the control of which by the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest. the issue of considering the entries and the concept .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... regional transport authority tumkur-572101 by its secretary.5. regional transport authority chithradurga-577501 by its secretary6 regional tansport authority mandya-571401 by its secretary7 karnataka state transport authority, ttmc building, 1st floor, shanthinagar bangalore-560027.8. regional transport authority ramanagara, by its secretary-581 453.9. regional ..... .2. the additional chief secretary to the government, rural development & panchayath raj (hearing authority), m.s.building, ... petitioners8ambedkar veedhi, begnaluru-560001.3. karnataka stae road transport corporation k.h.road, shanthinagar, bangalore-560027, rep:by its managing director, 4. regional transport authority bangaluru rural by its secretary, bda ..... procedure to be followed while exercising the power under section 99 and 100 of the act and not under section 102 of the act. hence, it is contended that the rule 5 of the karnataka state transport undertaking rules, 1996 is unconstitutional, null and void.23. per contra, .....
Tag this Judgment!