Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: karnataka Page 8 of about 2,268 results (0.213 seconds)

Smt. Hambamma Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1998Kant91; ILR1999KAR261; 1998(3)KarLJ688

..... that an authoritative decision by a full bench is required. accordingly, we adjourn this case for being heard by a full bench, as per section 8 of the karnataka high court act'. 6. the above reference raises two questions:(i) whether the authority granting the land under rule 43-j of the mysore land revenue (amendment) rules, 1960 ..... granted to different persons on the ground that they are cultivating government lands as lessees on temporary lease, by virtue of rule 43-j of the mysore (now karnataka) land revenue rules of 1960. after the grant of permanent saguvali chits, they alienated the lands to third parties. in some of the cases they were further ..... as providedtherein. rule 43 contains the procedure for disposal of lands for cultivation. sub-rule (1) of rule 43 requires persons seeking grant of land under the control of the revenue department, to make applications to the tahsildar by giving the particulars required therein. 9. the grant made under section 43-j with a condition imposed .....

Ganapathy Seetharam Bhat Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2413; 1993(3)KarLJ208

..... datatraya v. sherbanu hosang patel and ors., : [1976]1scr535 . the supreme court was considering the provisions of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act. the act enabled the landlord to seek eviction of the tenant 'who has sublet' the premises. by the time the landlord filed the suit for eviction, there was no sub ..... committee. apart from the elected members the government thought it fit to nominate respondents 3 to 5 as its nominees under section 59 of the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (the 'act'). the nomination was done on 28th august 1991. the period of the nominees to function as the members of the managing committee was not ..... out that the state government has not assisted indirectly in the formation or augmentation of the share capital of this society as provided in chapter vi of the act. similarly, there has been no guarantee by the state government for the repayment of the principal and payment of interest on debentures issued by this society. .....

Sri Sahasra Lingeshwara Temple, Rep. by Its Managing Trustee Sundaresh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(1)KarLJ1

..... that was seriously agitated was with regard to the definition of a 'hindu' in terms of section 2(16) of the definition. this act is called karnataka hindu religious institution and charitable endowment act of 1997. 'hindu' has been defined not to include a buddhist, jain or sikh. the hindu philosophy believe in 'vasudeva kutumbakam'. ..... state government in terms of the powers conferred on then has chosen to enact a law by name the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 and the rules framed thereunder. the said act in terms of the statement of objects and reasons was enacted in the light of a longstanding public demand ..... the control of the then mysore state. several kannada speaking districts which were part of bombay state got merged with the new state of karnataka so also the districts from the then madras state and districts from hyderabad state got merged to the state of karnataka.16. earlier the karnataka religious and charitable institution act, 1927 .....

S. Vasudeva and Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR39

..... theoretically, such a land may be capable of being used for agriculture and may fall within the definition of 'land' defined in section 2a(18) of the karnataka land reforms act. but the definitions are always subject to context and should be read in a practical manner.14. in the absence of any specific finding that these lands were ..... the whole notion of the legal 'test case'. secondly, the mere exposure to possible action is likely to affect the behaviour of persons who presently feel themselves immune from legal control.'5.6. in s.p. gupta v. president of india and ors : [1982]2scr365 . (popularly known as judges case), it was held that the lawyers have ..... article 39 of the constitution provides that the state shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing -(a) xxx xxx xxx xxx(b) that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good;(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result in the .....

Kallayya Ningayya Hiremath and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant315; ILR1989KAR218; 1989(1)KarLJ444

..... 11-1987 when rule was issued, and, considering the importance of the matter the petitions were referred to be decided by a division bench under s. 9 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, and that is how we are seized of these. petitions.3. in obedience to the notice issued, the corporation has filed a statement, of objections in ..... made by the first respondent i.e., the state for modification of the scheme. keeping in view that suggestion and on consideration of the fresh data in regard to traffic demand and proper co-ordination, a scheme was proposed in supersession of the earlier scheme. this later scheme covers wider area involving 174 routes while the 1970 scheme ..... the facts and circumstances to propose the 1982 scheme, that the 1982 scheme is the resultant of extensive survey of the routes and data collected both in regard to traffic demands and proper co-ordination and this scheme with 174 routes is of wider area as against 128 routes under the 1970 scheme, that lis many ,as 79 .....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Staff and Workers' Federati ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2000(4)KarLJ370

..... clause (8).41. several judgments were relied on by either side for several propositions. mr. m.c. narasimhan, learned senior counsel relied on management of karnataka state road transport corporation's case, supra, supreme court employees welfare association v union of india and others, and gorie gouri naidu (minor) and another v ..... of restricting the supervisory staff from becoming part of workers union inasmuch as in the course of discharge of their duties, they are called upon to control the employees under their supervision who belong to either class iii or class iv. the supervisory staff would be exposed to embarrassment in respect of loyalty ..... road transport corporation, bangalore and others v karnataka state road transport corporation staff and workers' federation and another dismissed the appeal filed by the corporation subject to a limited clarification that the question of applicability of section 34 of the corporations act is kept open. i must also notice that after the judgment .....

State of Karnataka Vs. H. Sadananda Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1993

..... kolar) were and are entitled to exercise such powers. the contention deserves to be accepted.21. as per clause 24(b) of section 2 of karnataka general clauses act, as inserted by karnataka act 9/1985, which came into force on 27-4-1985, the notifications issued by the zilla parishads are required to be published in the official gazette. ..... .p. foodstuffs (distribution) control order 1960 as amended in 1980 defines 'fair price shop' as a shop set up by the government under the government scheme' and 'the scheme for distribution of ..... the argument was that the scheme was formulated by the government pursuant to some power purported to be vested in the government under the m.p. foodstuffs (distribution) control order 1960 and that the government would otherwise have no power to formulate such a scheme. the assumption is not well-founded. in the first place, the m .....

Smt. Narasamma and ors. Vs. K.V. Ramprasad and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... the governance of the country, though not enforceable in courts of law.42. in view of the above observations, the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act, 1958 (for short court fees act) was amended by karnataka act no.2/1993, wherein article i has been substituted almost incorporating the suggestion made by the supreme court in the ..... a contract in respect of an agricultural land where there is a bar for transfer of the land to non-agriculturists under section 80 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961. it has been held that section 80 does not prohibit any agreement of sale between the land owner and non-agriculturists. what it ..... of offer made for sale and negotiations, the defendants have agreed to obtain previous permission of thegovernment under the provisions of karnataka schedule caste and schedule tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, which is necessary to conclude the contract.in paragraph 14, the plaintiff has contended that the defendants are evading .....

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... and sets out the achievements and objects of the congress. ex. p-3t has been published at hubli by one govardhan rao, the secretary of the karnataka pradesh congress election committee. ex. p-32 is an appeal by the appellant and the parliamentary congress candidate agadi sanganna to the electors of yelburga. it ..... a measure and its formulation as a rule of conduct. the legislature must declare the policy of the law and the legal principles which are to control any given cases and must provide a standard to guide the officials or the body in power to execute the law. the essential legislative function ..... constitution had, it was urged, power under article 4 of the constitution to make such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions. section 120 of the states reorganisation act, according to the argument, contains those supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions empowering the appropriate government to make the modifications and adaptations referred to in that section .....

G. Lakshman Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2177

..... ammunition must take out a licence. section 14 similarly required a licence if a person intended to keep fire arms or ammunition in his possession or under his control. the act did not specify the grounds upon which a licence could be granted or refused under sections 5 and 14 or the conditions subject to which such licence could ..... grant of the licence bearing no. 1/77 in form no. ix, the government of india, after making the necessary inquiries and in consultation with the government of karnataka and andhra pradesh amalgamated licence no. 25 of 1964 held by the petitioner earlier with licence no. 1 of 1977 and granted a comprehensive licence bearing no. 67/ ..... licenses in question which are not in dispute should be noted. after petitioner took over the business as the sole proprietor, he obtained another licence from the government of karnataka in form no. xi for the purpose of conversion, repair, test and sale of arms and ammunitions at bellary in the year 1968. the said licence was in .....