Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: delhi Page 35 of about 397 results (0.103 seconds)

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

Mirza Nissar HussaIn @ Naza Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... the trial) are all material factors, which ultimately weigh with the court in appraising the evidence, and deciding its worth. in simon & ors. v. state of karnataka, 2004 (2) scc 69.the supreme court observed that:14. ere identification of an accused person at the trial for the first time is from its very nature inherently ..... opening of the lock or that the lock was forced open. in these circumstances, it was reasonable to infer that the premises were open and under the control of the police a circumstance that ought to have weighed with the trial court in rejecting the alleged recoveries altogether.23. it was submitted that the prosecution ..... confession of a-9 is admissible in evidence and can be used against other accused persons also for their conviction by virtue of section 30 of the evidence act. v 62.circumstantial evidence courts approach the preceding discussion reveals that the case entirely hinges on appreciation of the circumstances. a brief discussion about the approach of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2013 (HC)

Ambica Plastopack Pvt Ltd and anr Vs. State and anr

Court : Delhi

..... of the true and relevant facts. imposition of costs 11. imposition of actual, realistic or proper costs and or ordering prosecution would go a long way in controlling the tendency of introducing false pleadings and forged and fabricated documents by the litigants. the cost should be equal to the benefits derived by the litigants, and the ..... under section218 cr.p.c. in framing charges. we are of the view that the number of three offences underlined in section 219 of the code cannot control section 220(1) of the code.14. in the instant case, the offences committed by the same person in respect of 16 cheques must certainly be held ..... . madanlal ramkumar cotton & general merchants, manu/ka/0045/2001, the karnataka high court held that the cause of action for filing a complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act is the service of notice contemplated under section 138(b) of the negotiable instruments act and not the dishonour of cheques. where one single notice of dishonour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2015 (HC)

State Bank of Hyderabad and Others Vs. All India Bank Deposit Collecto ...

Court : Delhi

..... bank), shri sunil prakash (assistant manager (law) union bank of india), shri arun kumar tyagi (deputy general manager, syndicate bank), shri sudershan d.sheth, (chief manager, karnataka bank), shri joginder pal bhagat (chief manager, uco bank), shri anil kumar v (chief manager, state bank of travancore), shri r.venkatesh (chief manager, state bank of ..... staff. they claimed that the work done by them was an integral part of the banking industry. they claimed to be working under the direct control and supervision of the bank management, and that the management of the bank was their pay master. thus, they claimed that there was a relationship ..... for the banks while implementing the instant award to retrospectively terminate the services retrospectively and make recoveries. 31. as per section 4 of the industrial disputes act, 1947, conciliation officers have to be appointed by the appropriate government, charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2016 (HC)

Delhi Medical Association Vs. Principal Secretary (Health) and Others

Court : Delhi

..... the degree of integrated courses is registered thereunder. 32. in view of the categorical provisions of the dmc act, need to deal with the judgments/orders of the high courts of madras and karnataka quashing the proceedings/fir registered against practitioners of indian medicine in those states, cited by counsel for dbcp, ..... the respondent no.1 principal secretary (health), deptt. of health and family welfare, gnctd, respondent no.2 commissioner of delhi police, respondent no.3 drugs controller, respondent no.6 principal secretary (health), govt. of india, respondent no.7 secretary, medical council of india, respondent no.8 ccim or by the ..... to the indian medical association; (ii) that the central government has enacted the indian medical council act, 1956 (mci act), the indian medicine central council act, 1970 (indian medicine act) and the homoeopathy central council, act, 1973 (homoeopathy act) with the object of defining the different systems of medicine in order to ensure that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2017 (HC)

M/S Star Press vs.meena Devi

Court : Delhi

..... thus resulting in his death. in our opinion the learned commissioner rightly reached his conclusion and imposed liability on the employer under section 3 of the act. karnataka high court 23. in m a kareem sab v. palaniyamma, 2013 scc online kar 4514, a vehicle was stolen and the taxi driver was killed by ..... high court in bhagubai (supra) and arti (supra); madras high court in v. komala (supra) and rahmath (supra); gauhati high court in sabita gope (supra); karnataka high court in palaniyamma (supra). conclusion 35. the order of the commissioner, employees compensation holding the appellant is liable to pay compensation to respondent is upheld.36. the ..... that the dictionary assists in appreciating and comprehending the general sense of the words. however, the words of a dictionary will not control the scheme of the statute. the supreme court in deputy chief controller of imports and exports, new delhi, v. k.t. kosalram and ors., observed :"what particular meaning should be attached to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the appellants have at no time exercised any claim or entitlement to the road in question.140. reliance has also been placed on a single bench pronouncement of the karnataka high court reported at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made ..... encroachments.98. a similar challenge was rejected by a ld. single judge when seven writ petitions challenging the steps taken by the forest department and the flood control department of the government of nct of delhi pursuant to the notification dated 2nd april, 1996. the decision of the ld. single judge dated 15th march, ..... (a) orderly arrangements for relocation and rehabilitation of slum dwellers and jhuggijhompri clusters in delhi in accordance with the provisions of the delhi urban shelter improvement board act, 2010 (delhi act 7 of 2010) and the master plan for delhi, 2021 to ensure its development in a sustainable, planned and humane manner; (b) scheme and orderly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the appellants have at no time exercised any claim or entitlement to the road in question.140. reliance has also been placed on a single bench pronouncement of the karnataka high court reported at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made ..... encroachments.98. a similar challenge was rejected by a ld. single judge when seven writ petitions challenging the steps taken by the forest department and the flood control department of the government of nct of delhi pursuant to the notification dated 2nd april, 1996. the decision of the ld. single judge dated 15th march, ..... (a) orderly arrangements for relocation and rehabilitation of slum dwellers and jhuggijhompri clusters in delhi in accordance with the provisions of the delhi urban shelter improvement board act, 2010 (delhi act 7 of 2010) and the master plan for delhi, 2021 to ensure its development in a sustainable, planned and humane manner; (b) scheme and orderly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2016 (HC)

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... -discipline and that fortunate alchemy by which men are loyal to the obligation with which they are entrusted. but it is also true that reason cannot control the subconscious influence of feelings of which it is unaware. when there is ground for believing that such unconscious feelings may operate in the ultimate judgment, ..... 2010, i was functioning as district judge-vi-cum-additional sessions judge, incharge of the criminal work of east district apart from special judge (prevention of corruption act) on the basis of investigation conducted by cbi. apart from this regular functioning, the district & sessions judge- i, incharge of entire session work of delhi ..... that the charge sheet was assigned to the additional chief metropolitan magistrate of north east district and the matter was not one under the prevention of corruption act, allocated the matter to the learned district judge-vii/additional sessions judge/karkardooma, delhi. the relevant extract of the order dated 01.04.2010 is reproduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (HC)

Yogesh Mittal vs.enforcement Directorate

Court : Delhi

..... , for this purpose, as to how he came to receive the complaint directly or on transfer from the chief judicial magistrate. 55. the supreme court in state of karnataka and anr vs. pastor p.raju, air2006sc2825 the supreme court has held as follows:-" 7. several provisions in chapter xiv of the code of criminal procedure use the ..... sentence proposed to be imposed on him. provided also that (a) no adjournment shall be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party; (b) the fact that the pleader of a party is engaged in another court, shall not be a ground for adjournment; (c) where a ..... rai, ms. mohita, ms. adrija thakur & mr. kunal dutt, advocates. judgment ashutosh kumar, j1 the petitioner, without approaching the special court under the prevention of money laundering act, 2002 (hereinafter called pmla) for grant of bail, has preferred the present petition seeking bail in ecir no.18/dzo-8/2016 primarily on the ground that his remand bail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2019 (HC)

Gaurav Aggarwal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... under section 338 ipc, subject to payment of rs.2 lacs (by the former to the latter) by pay order no.532033 dated 25.04.2013 drawn on karnataka bank in his favour. the statement of divik kashyap affirming the compounding by him of the offence under section 338 ipc was separately recorded on 26.04.2013 (at ..... or that the accident occurred due to negligence of the person named divik.49. on the contrary, the proceedings recorded in the trial court show not only lack of control by the presiding judicial officer (s) over the trial but also elusive and dilatory conduct on the part of the crl.mc40552016 page 32 of 36 petitioner. at ..... on 03.07.2002, upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (fir) no.560/2001 of police station mukherjee nagar on allegations of his involvement in certain acts of commission and omission constituting offences punishable under sections 279 and 338 of the indian penal code, 1860 crl.mc40552016 page 1 of 36 (ipc). the metropolitan magistrate having .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //