Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 25 of about 394 results (0.267 seconds)

May 14 2008 (HC)

The Unemployed Secondary Grade Teachers Welfare Association Vs. the St ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)6MLJ224

..... central government and partly by one or more state governments, (iii) a corporation (including a co-operative society) established by or under a central act which is owned, controlled or managed by the central government, the central government. (2) in relation to any other establishment, the government of the state in which that ..... to the candidates sponsored by the employment exchange, the learned single judge, by placing reliance upon the supreme court decision in : (2006)iillj722sc (secretary of karnataka v. umadevi), has concluded that the impugned government orders and proceedings had not been issued in derogation of any statutory rule and unless the statutory rules ..... the contention of mr. setalvad seeking to put a very wide and liberal construction upon the words 'any law' and 'any requirement'. these words are obviously controlled by the words 'residence within the state or union territory' which words mean what they say, neither more nor less. it follows, therefore, that section 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1999 (HC)

Abdul Nasser Madani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1258

..... stated that 44 cases were investigated by them. as there were so many instances of criminal conspiracy, purchase of explosive materials from various places including karnataka, purchase of country made revolvers and ammunitions from kerala and transporting them to coimbatore, manufacturing of improvised types of explosive weapons such as box bombs, ..... riots and police firings and extensive damages to muslim properties running into crores of rupees during three days following the stabbing to death of a traffic police constable named selvaraj.4. there were three other incidents of pipe bomb explosions at poombuhar town hall at 5.00 p.m., ukkadam ..... during investigation, clinching evidences have also been collected which established the above facts. in pursuance of the conspiracy, he actively involved himself in further incriminating acts such as procuring of explosives, arms and ammunitions, a part of which were later seized during the course of investigation. there is ample evidence collected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2009 (HC)

Shanita Holdings Sdn and A. Sekararajasekaran Vs. Shanita Hotel Trichy ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas116(Mad); [2009]92SCL133(Mad)

..... 397 - 409), in so far as they relate to southern region be dealt with the additional principal bench, which will have jurisdiction over the states of tamilnadu, karnataka, kerala, andhra pradesh and union territories of pondicherry and lakshadweep islands (as per gsr 917 (e) dated. 14.12.2000 issued by the company law board). ..... singh v. state of punjab : (2006)8scc294 , whereby the honourable supreme court has inter alia held that 'the high court's power of superintendence and control over all subordinate courts and tribunals is both of administrative and judicial nature, etc.,' continuing further, he presses into service the decision of the honourable supreme court ..... to have seen the necessary pleadings before granting such orders. the court below has failed to see whether the requirements of section 39 of the specific relief act have been complied with by the respondents and has also failed to visualise the consequence of the orders. therefore, there is a clear violation of principles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2012 (HC)

D.Vijayakumari Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Home

Court : Chennai

..... reading the same as a whole. for the said purpose the attendant circumstances may also be taken into consideration. {islamic academy of education and another vs. state of karnataka and others (2003) 6 scc 697, m/s zee telefilms ltd. & anr. vs. union of india & ors. jt 2005 (2) sc 8 and ..... the order of detention. the alleged non consideration of the pre-detention representation is neither willful nor wanton, but due to the circumstances beyond his control.8. learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that admittedly, the pre-detention representation sent by the detenu has been received by the second ..... ' under the tamilnadu prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers, drug offenders, forest offenders, goondas, immoral traffic offenders, sand offenders, slum grabbers and video pirates act, 1982 (tamil nadu act 14 of 1982) (hereinafter referred to as the act). the detaining authority, after considering the relevant materials relating to the aforesaid six cases, came to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2012 (HC)

Murugan Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

..... reads as follows:the dalits of uthapuram village near here, where the 'untouchability' wall was demolished in 2008, on thursday entered a temple under the control of the upper caste hindus, with police protection.though scores of upper caste hindus received the 11 dalit persons outside the temple with folded hands, the ..... drinks to scheduled caste persons and non-scheduled caste persons. in our opinion, this is highly objectionable, and is an offence under the sc/st act, and hence those practising it must be criminally proceeded against and given harsh punishment if found guilty. all administrative and police officers will be accountable and ..... tribes is resented and more often these people become victims of attacks by the vested interests.[objects and reasons - sc and st (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989]11.when the pernicious practice of untouchability never ceased, m.katju,j., after recalling the equality principle incorporated in the americanl declaration of independence lamented .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2011 (HC)

Thirumangalam Agricultural Producers Co.Op Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

..... supreme court cases - 452, it has hold that when supply of electricity is disrupted by tripping, load shedding and power goods, it would be beyond the control of the consumer to consume the electricity upto the minimum guarantee. in such circumstances, the liability of the consumer to pay the minimum guarantee charges cannot be wholly ..... to quashed.(c). apart from the above decisions, the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of topasa ramasa patil vs. karnataka electricity board, bangalore and others reported in air 1989 karnataka 279, wherein it is held as follows:- in matters of slow or faulty recording of the meter, it is only the ..... for which such directions were issued by the state government.(3) the provisions of the enactments specified in the schedule, not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, shall apply to the states in which such enactments are applicable.(4). the central government may, as and when considered necessary, by notification, amend the schedule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2003 (HC)

P. Ramakrishnan and V.K. Mohandas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Sec ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ463Mad

..... to regularise the services of the petitioners with all consequential and attendant benefits.2. the petitioners are working as bakermen in the mrc canteen under the control of the 2nd respondent. the first petitioner was recruited during 1983 as a casual labour with the 2nd respondent during 1979 and since their initial recruitment ..... from time to time, taking steps to provide the said services. the canteen committees, the cooperative society of the employees and the contractors have only been acting for and on behalf of the corporation as its agencies to provide the said services. the corporation has been taking active interest even in organising the canteen ..... has been held thus :-'25. what emerges from the statute law and the judicial decisions is as follows: (i) whereas under the provisions of the factories act, it is statutorily obligatory on the employer to provide and maintain canteen for the use of his employees, the canteen becomes a part of the establishment and, therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2002 (HC)

S. Udhayakumar, Advocate Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ476

..... option available to state legislature to constitute institutions for local self-government and define their compositions, duration have been taken away by the constitutional amendment. the karnataka high court was dealing with a converse case where the government failed to conduct elections to panchayat raj institutions even after the expiry of 5 years, ..... . article 243z provides for auditing of accounts of municipalities. article 243za provides for constitution of state election commission for the purpose of superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the electoral rolls for and the conduct of, all elections to the municipalities. article 243zb speaks of applicability of part ix-a ..... assembly of the state or a member of either house of parliament.' 'section - 6: notwithstanding anything contained in the 1919 act, the 1971 act, the 1981 act or the 1920 act, as amended by this act, or in any other law for the time being in force or in any judgment, decree or order of a court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1998 (HC)

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2000]70ITD406(Mad)

..... fundamental principle of interpretation that nothing is to be read in and nothing is to be implied, one can only look fairly at the language used in the statute (karnataka state financial corpn v. cit : [1988]174itr206(kar) , smt. radhdevi mohatta v. cit : [1981]129itr229(bom) . if para-17a of the tribunal order ..... therefore, only apply the law without abrogating, abandoning or sterilizing the provisions of' such law. indeed, the stand of the assessee that the provisions of the act becomes sterilized once the assessment is made under section 115j, is self-contradictory and with inherent fallacy besides amounting to insertion of words `anterior' to the provisions ..... have to be allowed or adjusted.unabsorbed loss, unadjusted depreciation, etc., for the purpose of carrying forward has to be determined under the provisions of the act while completing assessment under section 143(1) or under section 143(3) and such unabsorbed loss, unadjusted depreciation, etc., to be carried forward in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2010 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. P. Govindaraj,

Court : Chennai

..... totalling into rs. 2750/- for personal expenses and taken the pecuniary loss to the family at rs. 4750/-.12. as held in : 2003 acj 1775 [divisional controller, karnataka state road transport corporation v. mahadeva shetty and anr.], courts have duty to award just compensation. what is just and reasonable compensation cannot be adopted by any mathematical ..... of decisions, the supreme court has taken consistent view that one-third deduction to be made for personal expenses. in : 2004 (2) scc 473 [fakeerappa v. karnataka cement pipe factory] while considering the appropriateness of 50% deduction towards personal and living expenses of the deceased, the supreme court has held that what would be the ..... 10.2003 thereby tribunal has awarded compensation of rs. 13,21,040/- to the claimants who are parents of the deceased manohar who died in a road traffic accident on 08.10.2000.2. brief facts are that on 08.10.2000, deceased manohar was travelling in the bus bearing registration no. tn-27 v .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //