Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 12,878 results (0.212 seconds)

Jan 17 2000 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Sadanand Parusharam Hosurkar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2000)ACC312; 2000CriLJ2426; 2000(2)KarLJ477

..... the centre of the road. this was the first breach of the law. secondly, what is pointed out to me is that under the provisions of the traffic control act though the original provision prohibited the carriage of more than one person on a bicycle, that by amendments carried out in the years 1986-87 to section ..... court has repeatedly issued directions to the traffic control department to enforce the lane system and stop zig-zagging on the roads but not even a little finger has been lifted. the home minister shall personally ..... been steadily increasing at the rate of about 11% per year, most of them being fatal, 870 deaths having taken place in the last two years. the traffic control department of the state government has been cheerfully watching the fun, happy that the population problem is automatically taking care of itself, which is absolutely unpardonable. this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2007 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep. by Its Commissioner Vs. Philom ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD1; 2008(1)ALT670

..... 18 of the karnataka small cause courts act and that a finding of fact based on oral evidence should not ordinarily be set aside by an appellate court save and except for strong ..... under the act.52. now the other judgments relied upon by the learned senior counsel sri s. satyanarayana prasad. in h. seshadri v. k.r. natarajan : [2003]3scr505 : 2003 (5) alt 28.1 (dn sc), the supreme court held that the high court had limited jurisdiction under section 50(1) of the karnataka rent control act and section ..... interlocutory mandatory injunction ultimately rested in the discretion of the court to be exercised in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case. in karnataka rare earth v. senior geologist, department of mines & geology : (2004)2scc783 , the supreme court held that the doctrine of actus curiae neminem gravabit was applicable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2005 (HC)

Bansilal Vs. Dr. N.C. Nagaraj

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(5)KarLJ377

..... the central government or a local authority;(ii) a muzarai or religious or charitable institution;(iii) a wakf.70. repeal and savings.--(1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of section 69.--(a) all proceedings in execution of any ..... been filed therein.4. the revisional court was of this view for the reason that the karnataka rent control act, 1961 stood repealed as from 31-12-2001 and was replaced by karnataka rent act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as '1999 act' for short) and in terms of the provisions of section 70(2)(c) of ..... petitioners are all tenants in the premises located in different places wherein the provisions of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as '1961 act' for short) was applicable and the respective landlords had initiated proceedings under this act for eviction of these tenants invoking the different provisos to section 21(1) of the 1961 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2008 (HC)

Bowring Institute, a Society Registered Under the Karnataka Societies ...

Court : Karnataka

..... excellence and the administration has got full transparency. when such being the case, the district registrar of societies, exercising his power under section 25 of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960, on the basis of the complaint given by few unscrupulous members of the institute regarding the functioning of the institute, without application of mind, ..... that, the genuineness of the allegations would be known only after conducting suitable enquiry. therefore, by exercising his power as envisaged under section 25 of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960, on the basis of the information cum complaint given by some of the members of the institute, has passed the impugned order, appointing the ..... of suo-moto power may come from any source including a single member of the society. the exercise of such power by the registrar cannot be controlled by the fact that the complaint is made by less than 1/3rd of the members. if the number of members petitioning to the registrar is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2009 (HC)

Mr. Brijesh Patel S/O. Parashuram Patel, Honorary Secretary, Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3980

..... respondents 5 and 6, who are members of ksca, are said to have filed an application purportedly under section 25 of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the ksr act, for brevity) calling upon the registrar of societies to hold an enquiry into alleged financial and other irregularities in the management of ..... it is contended that ksca is a premier sporting body for promotion and ragulation of cricket in the state and is affiliated to the board of cricket control in india. its activities have gained public importance having regard to the huge popularity that the game enjoys. consequently, the commercial activities that accompany the ..... , the persons appointed are not in the services of the state government - they are answerable to none except the registrar. he, in turn, has no control over them except possibly a personal relationship of acquaintance. there is no provision for the payment of remuneration or expenses of such authorised person. in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1996 (HC)

C.N. Ramachandra Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant181

..... that the respondent will pay rs.3500/-when he is taking possession under order of allotment. no doubt the rental that is determined under .section 8(4) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 as per proviso is subject to fixation of a fair rent under section 14 and it has so provided under the proviso to section 8(4). the operation ..... . 3,500/- and not specifically either for premises or for fan or television etc. it became necessary for the rent controller to indicate the rental of the building and take an approximate estimate. he cannot be said to have, acted, in such acase, without jurisdiction. even if for a moment that might be an irregularity but in such a case ..... i am unable to take it as between, whether landlord himself does not bifurcate two types of charges and in the intimation only he clumsily indicates as the rental. it is open to the rent controller to do .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1991 (HC)

Dr. A.S. Rashid Ahmed Vs. Gopalakrishna Kamath

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3648; 1992(1)KarLJ195

..... 'the munsiff' or 'the trial court') against the respondents seeking their eviction under clause (h) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 21 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (for short 'the act1) from eviction petition, schedule house-cum-landed property situate near the munsiff's court, karkala and described in the eviction petition schedule ' ..... the civil court under section 9 of the civil procedure code vis-a-vis the power of a small causes court under the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947. eventually, his lordship bopanna, j has held as under:'whenever a question of ouster of jurisdiction arises, it is the duty of the civil court ..... interfere with a finding of fact recorded by the original court in similar circumstances. with particular reference to section 12b of the madras buildings (lease & rent control) act of 1949, i should add that the power of revision under it is wider than the power conferred under section 115 of the c.p.c. and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1992 (HC)

B. Vishwanatha Shetty Vs. P.N. Padmavathi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR2424; 1992(3)KarLJ330

..... at all germane to the point under consideration. the learned counsel is wrong in contending that the lease in question does not attract the provisions of the karnataka rent control act, because his submission is made without reference to the provisions relating to hotels and lodging house.50. in fact, this aspect relating to the lease of ..... to see as to whether the lease in question is a lease of the 'building' or 'premises', the said expressions being understood as they are defined in the karnataka rent control act. at this juncture, it is indeed necessary to state as to what exactly is the connotation of the term 'composite lease'. the expressions 'building' and 'premises ..... either side.11. sri shekara shetty, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the lower court has erred in taking the view that the provisions of the karnataka rent control act are not applicable to the facts of the case. dilating on this aspect, it was argued by the learned counsel that the view taken by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1997 (HC)

Lingappa Police Patil Vs. the Registrar of Societies

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR3127

..... fact whether they had paid subscription or they were in arrears. referring to the provisions of sections 2(b), 6, 9 and 19 of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (hereinafter called the 'act) and rule 3 made thereunder, it was claimed that despite being in arrears, a person had to be continued as a member and could ..... not be disqualified or expelled. the object of the act is stated to be to provide for the registration of literary, scientific, charitable and other societies in the state of karnataka. the act does not specifically provide for expulsion of a member. it was claimed that a person who had ..... , proceedings at such meetings including voting by members, the governing body and proceedings of meetings of the governing body : provided that, save as otherwise provided in this act, no rule or regulation of a society shall exclude any member from being entitled to vote. (3) the memorandum and rules and regulations of the society shall be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1999 (HC)

Md. KutubuddIn Vs. Bhaikar Raja Mitraji Anand Kumar and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD83; 2000(1)ALT83

..... is only an interlocutory order and it does not fall within the purview of section 22 of a.p. buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960, for short the 'act'. he added that the rent control act is a complete code. he cited catena of decisions in support of the above contention and they are reported in ms. jetha bai and sons ..... 115 cpc? ii. whether the amendments introduce new case or new cause of action and if so what is the effect ?it is well settled that the rent control act is a special enactment, by which the statutory protection is granted to the tenant and at the same time the landlord is provided with a speedier remedy. although code ..... may, at any time, on the application of any aggrieved parry, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed or proceeding taken under this act by the controller in execution under section 15 or by the appellate authority on appeal under section 20, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality, regularity or propriety .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //