Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1998Kant383; ILR1999KAR4035; 1998(5)KarLJ123
..... by the state government, or and company which is a subsidiary of such company; (iv) a society registered or deemed to have been registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960, which is subject to the control of the state government and which is notified in this behalf in the official gazette; (v) a co-operative society; (vi) a university; explanation.--in this ..... the government; (g) a person in the service of pay of.- (i) a local authority in the state of karnataka; (ii) a statutory body or a corporation (not being a local authority) established by or under a state or central act, owned or controlled by the state government and any other board or corporation as the state government, having regard to its financial .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ386; 2009(1)KCCR551; 2009(2)AIRKarR214; AIR2009NOC1286
..... . : ilr2006kar212 the facts in that case were, an eviction petition was filed in the year 1989, under section 21(1)(h) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 1961 act). during the pendency of the petition, the tenant died as on 10.3.1991. his legal representatives were brought on record. the petition was ..... earlier in respect of the very premises in case no. hrc 10352/1983 under section 21(1)(a)(h) and (p) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the '1961 act'). the same was dismissed on merits by order dated 12.4.1989, and was confirmed in a revision petition before this court in hrrp ..... the legislation, specially those dealing with substantive rights and obligations. it is a misnomer to say that sub-section (2-a) of section 15 of the karnataka sales tax act is being given retrospective operation. determining the obligation of the partners to pay the tax assessed against the firm by making them personally liable is not the same .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1988KAR1591; 1988(2)KarLJ8
..... , c.j. 1. the question of law that calls for decision by us reads thus : -'whether a usufructuary mortgagee is a landlord for purposes of part-ii of the karnataka rent control act, 1961?''2. the facts leading to the controversy may be recapitulated :the jurisdictional hrc revenue inspector, vide his report dated 24-8-1981, intimated the vacancy of premises no. 24 ..... ), sri subramanya temple street, v.v. puram bangalore-4.thereafter the vacancy was notified by the house rent controller suo motu in hrc. alt. 209/81. a notice under s. 8(1)(a) of the karnataka rent control act, 196 1, (hereinafter referred to as the act), was also issued to smt. kousalya bai the owner of the premises. in the meanwhile, the writ-petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2005Kant386; ILR2005KAR2682; 2005(4)KarLJ279
..... the method of selection.10. the state government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fees) act, 1984, has made rules namely 'the karnataka conduct of entrance test to post graduate medical and dental degree and diploma courses rules 2003' (for short 'rules ..... admission. they have taken the entrance test as in-service candidates. the 1st petitioner though a medical officer in the services of the government of karnataka has taken the test as an open category candidate since he does not fall within the definition of 'in-service candidate' prescribed under the rules ..... services, employees' state insurance (medical) services, mahanagara palike services, boards and corporations services and autonomous medical institutions registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 including the persons deputed from such services to any other foreign services'.12. the government has passed a government order dated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1994SC2233; JT1994(1)SC376; 1994(1)SCALE393; (1994)2SCC691; [1994]1SCR579; 1994(2)LC145(SC)
..... india and ors. : [1970]1scr479 . in considering the expression 'so far as it appears to be necessary or expedient for carrying out the provisions of the act (gold control act), the constitution bench in the said decision held that the said phrase was not subjective in the context of the scheme and object of the legislation. the opinion of ..... [1985]2scr398 and prabhakaran nair and ors. v. state of tamil nadu and ors., : [1988]1scr1 . 31. reference was also made to section 8a of the karnataka sales tax act which is set out as hereunder: the state government may by notification make an exemption or reduction in rate, in respect of any tax payable under this ..... is contended that section 14 is quite similar to rule 39 of the mineral concession rules. in this connection, reference has also been made to rule 66 of the karnataka minor mineral concession rules. 1969, containing provisions for relaxation of rules in special cases. the said rule is set out as hereunder: 66. relaxation of rules in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2000(1)KarLJ72
..... an authority under article 12 of the constitution. suffice it to say that deep and pervasive government control over the affairs of the entity whether registered as a co-operative society or a society under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960, is one of the important tests applicable for determining the status of the institution. fiscal ..... a preliminary objection to the maintainability of this writ petition. it was contended that the institute being an autonomous body registered as a society under the karnataka societies registration act, was neither state nor an authority within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution so as to be amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this ..... or was holding a post under the government or a local authority or a corporation established by a state act or a central act or established by the government under a state act or central act and owned or controlled by the government by the number of years during which he is or was holding such post or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2009(1)KarLJ658
..... ) a centre for educational, religious, social or cultural activities or for philanthropic service run by a co-operative society registered under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (karnataka act 11 of 1959) or a society registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or by a trust created wholly for charitable, educational or religious purposes;(v) a police station, an area office ..... the petitioner, the reference to a judgment of this court in the case of b. venkataswamy reddy v. state of karnataka : ilr1989kar75 was only misconceived as in that case, the court was only considering the scope of section 3 of the act and not with regard to the right of the petitioner to claim reconveyance or for reallotment. it has further been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2000(6)KarLJ374
..... ) to any corporation, body or organisation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government; or (iv) to any housing co-operative society registered under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (karnataka act 11 of 1959); or (v) to any society registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960); or (vi) to a trust ..... 38c. section 38c had been introduced by section 5 of b.d.a. iii (amendment) act, 1993. section 5 makes this amendment retrospective with effect from the date of commencement of the act. section 5 of the karnataka act no. 17 of 1994 reads as under:'section 5. insertion of new sections 38b and 38c.- ..... after section 38a of the principal act, the following shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect from the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)792; 2000(8)SCALE281; [2000]Supp5SCR483; (2001)1UPLBEC313
..... prevail under article 254 of the constitution.45. indeed the learned single judge found no impediment in an acquisition for the appellant despite section 3 of the karnataka act when he said:all the members of the society belong to the weaker section of the society and they do not have residential sites to have a ..... respondent-owners filed objections to the acquisition. all the objections including the objection relating to the non-register ability of the appellant under the karnataka society registration act were rejected. according to the noting on the file dated 23.11.1991 ' the land owner can question the validity of the registration of the association ..... respondents 5 to 7 before the high court (writ petition no. 21438 of 1991). it was contended that the appellant was not duly registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 and, therefore, it was not lawful to acquire the land for it. no interim order was passed and the acquisition proceedings continued.18. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2007SC465; 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)897; 2006(4)ARBLR192(SC); 2007(1)AWC837(SC); JT2006(10)SC414; 2006(11)SCALE665; (2007)1SCC467; 2007(2)CivilLJ783(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)1752; 2006AIRSCW5871
..... by the leaned counsel, the question arose as to whether the landlord can file an application for fixation of fair rent under tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960. in that context, it was held:. as the object of the statute was to protect those inhabitants who had previously no access to the rates ( ..... or appellate jurisdiction. section 5 imposes a blanket ban on judicial intervention of any type in the arbitral process except 'where so provided under part i' of this act. pursuant to this provision, section 37(1) provides appeals against certain orders of the court, while section 37(2) provides appeal against certain orders of the arbitral ..... this behalf from his superior officers. on 23.8.2002, he expressed his inability to continue with the proceedings. a notice under section 14 of the 1996 act was again served. a proposal was made thereunder to nominate another independent person as an arbitrator. the irrigation department of the state of bihar asked the superintending .....
Tag this Judgment!