Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes prohibition of transfer of certain lands act 1978 section 4 prohibition of transfer of granted lands Page 1 of about 1,024 results (0.216 seconds)

Hanumanna Vs. Machappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR3507; 1996(1)KarLJ359

..... division bench of this court in the case of karappa bovi v. special deputy commissioner, mysore and ors1990 (3) klj supp 361. has observed as under:'karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, section 4 - land grant-operative from date of grant - issuance of saguvali chit is in furtherance ..... factual observation made by the special deputy commissioner in the course of his order passed in the appeal filed before him under section 5a of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, has neither been controverted nor shown to be incorrect. in fact, the learned single judge ..... waive rs. 200/- out of the upset price; the balance being payable in annual instalments not exceeding three. therefore, in the case of poor scheduled caste or scheduled tribe persons, the price may be fixed by waiving rs. 200/- out of the upset price. the above definition would clearly indicate that the upset .....

Dyamappa Vs. Appanna Bhovi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1894; 1993(2)KarLJ540

..... declare the alienation of the granted land made by his father in favour of respondent-2 gurunanjappa as null and void under section 4 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (the act for short) contending that it was made in contravention of the condition ..... to consider the overriding effect of section 11 of the act with reference to rule 29a of the karnataka land grant rules, 1969 by which alienations of lands granted to persons other than members of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes are permitted. interpreting the non-obstinate clause contained in section 11 of the act with reference ..... enjoy the granted lands themselves at least for the period during which the prohibition was to remain operative. experience had shown that persons belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes to whom the lands were granted were, because of their poverty, lack of education and general backwardness, exploited by various persons who .....

Chickkathimmaiah Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Kolar and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3154; 1999(6)KarLJ615

..... the transferee i.e., purchaser from the order dated 6-5-1994 passed by the assistant commissioner, kolar, in proceedings under section 5 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978. the assistant commissioner has declared the transfer deed or sale deed executed by the grantee ..... to restore the land except in cases which are exemptedunder later part of clause (b) of section 5(1) of the act. section 4 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 reads as under:--'section 4. prohibition of transfer of granted lands: (1) notwithstanding anything in ..... land granted shall not be alienated except to the members of the scheduled castes or scheduled tribes shall, with effect from the commencement of the karnataka land grant (amendment) rules, 1974 cease to operate'. by virtue of clause (2) and section 5 of the karnataka general clauses act, this rule came into force on 17-10 .....

Smt. Narasamma and ors. Vs. K.V. Ramprasad and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... at the time of offer made for sale and negotiations, the defendants have agreed to obtain previous permission of thegovernment under the provisions of karnataka schedule caste and schedule tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, which is necessary to conclude the contract.in paragraph 14, the plaintiff has contended ..... first respondent for enforcement of the agreements for sale of granted lands without previous permission of the government under section 4(2) of the karnataka scheduled caste and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 are liable to be rejected under order 7 rule 11(d) of the code ..... sri kalyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that perusal of the plaints would disclose that the suit schedule properties are granted lands and attract the provisions of the karnataka scheduled caste and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (for short the act). the defendants have agreed to .....

Krishnappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the person who was granted the land, thereby the very beneficial legislation enacted with an object to protect the persons belonging toe scheduled castes and scheduled tribes under the karnataka scheduled castes scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, will be defeated. the attitude of the government and its ..... deputy commissioner without reference to the proceedings of the assistant commissioner who directed the tahsildar to restore the land under the provisions of karnataka scheduled castes scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, 24 who was also a party before the deputy commissioner clearly indicates ..... strange, since the custodian of the records is the state government. unfortunately, in one breath, the assistant commissioner who is acting under the karnataka scheduled castes scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, proceeded to confirm the grant based on the report of the tahsildar. thereafter, .....

K.C. Javaregowda Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... out of this granted land, the appellant herein purchased 20 guntas of land from the 4th respondent on 14.8.1967. on 1.1.1979 the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 came into force and under section 4 of the said act, alienation made against the terms ..... the deputy commissioner set aside the order passed by the assistant commissioner. being aggrieved, the 4th respondent filed a writ petition in the high court of karnataka at bangalore and the said writ petition was allowed and the matter was remitted to the deputy commissioner. thereafter, the deputy commissioner confirmed the order originally ..... passed by the assistant commissioner. aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed a writ petition before the high court of karnataka. the learned single judge of the high court dismissed the writ petition and thereafter the appellant pursued the matter in writ appeal and the same was also .....

Cyril D'souza Vs. Ponkra Mugera and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(1)KarLJ659

..... and penalty receipt as annexure-b and c. the petitioner's case is that 3rd respondent initiated proceedings against the petitioner under the provisions of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 and the 3rd respondent, that is, the assistant commissioner, issued notice to the petitioner. ..... in question, the 1st respondent was not the grantee thereof as the land in question had not been granted land, hence section 4(1) of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, for short, 'act 1978', does not apply to the present case, but the assistant commissioner ..... agreement to transfer the land had been entered long before enforcement ofact 2 of 1979. he contended that act 2 of 1979, that is the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, did come into operation on 1st of january, 1979. by the agreement to transfer the land .....

Smt. Hambamma Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1998Kant91; ILR1999KAR261; 1998(3)KarLJ688

..... for a period of 15 years when such condition was not imposed by the order of the authority making the grant. 2. section 4 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') provides that any transfer of land coming within the ..... into force. (the said act will hereinafter be referred to as 'karnataka act 2 of 1979'). it came into force on 1-1-1979. section 4 of ..... lease, by virtue of rule 43-j of the mysore (now karnataka) land revenue rules of 1960. after the grant of permanent saguvali chits, they alienated the lands to third parties. in some of the cases they were further alienated. thereafter the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 came .....

B.R. Siddaramu Vs. The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary and O ...

Court : Karnataka

..... family members of late hanumanthaiah and contending that the land granted by the land tribunal was sold by late hanumanthaiah in contravention of section 4 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ptcl act' for short) filed the application under section 5 of ..... undisputed position. the form no.10 under the karnataka land reforms rules was thereafter issued is also evident. the sale transaction in respect of the land has taken place on 07.12.2000 and 06.06.2003. the said late hanumanthaiah who belonged to scheduled caste, being a tenant was conferred with the occupancy rights ..... through the order dated 29.06.1981. the distinction therefore is that the land in question was not a 'granted land' but, late hanumanthaiah a schedule caste person was conferred the occupancy right to that land. the conferment of occupancy right no doubt would be circumscribed by the condition of non-alienation as .....

S. Pitchumuthu Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ96

..... the land i.e., the sale deed in favour of the judgment-debtor had been annulled for contravention of the provisions of section 4(1) of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978; that the land had been directed to be re-granted in favour of the legal heirs of ..... person who was a purchaser of land that had been originally granted in favour of a scheduled caste person and subject to certain conditions. the land in question was subject-matter of proceedings before the authorities under the provisions of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978, at the instance of ..... . even a purchaser of the land if loses rights under the sale deed in respect of the land that had been granted in favour of a scheduled caste person subject to certain conditions if the said sale was in violation of the condition or without obtaining necessary permission from the government, a person like .....