Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 52 landlord and tenant to furnish particulars Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 103 results (0.116 seconds)

Naunihal Singh and ors. Vs. Alice Georgina Skinner and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1925All707; 92Ind.Cas.63

..... of such larger interest for a period of more than 12 years. in the matter of the mortgaged properties so transferred, it controls article 148 of the indian limitation act in the same way as it controls article 140. if the mortgaged property is in possession not of the mortgagee but in that of a transferee from him who claims ..... skinner, to secure this debt and a further loan of rs. 6,000 odd makes the mortgage of the 10th november, 1867, and places the mortgagees in complete control of the income of the mortgaged property and i recall here what their lordships of the privy council said regarding this arrangement. they said that the mortgagees were placed in ..... to have purchased larger interest therein for consideration, what a man is not allowed to do under article 148 of the indian limitation act he cannot .....

Korematsu Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that those of japanese ancestry (1) depart from the area; (2) report to and temporarily remain in an assembly center; (3) go under military control to a relocation center, there to remain for an indeterminate period until released conditionally or unconditionally by the military authorities. each of these requirements, it will ..... be noted, imposed distinct duties in connection with the separate steps in a complete evacuation program. had congress directly incorporated into one act the language of these separate orders, and provided sanctions for their violations, disobedience of any one would have constituted a separate offense. cf. blockburger v ..... including that, in which he lived. march 21, 1942, congress enacted [ footnote 2/3 ] that anyone who knowingly "shall enter, remain in, leave, or commit any act in any military area or military zone prescribed . . . by any military commander . . . contrary to the restrictions applicable to any such area or zone or contrary to .....

Lichter Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... enemy property); hirabayashi v. united states, 320 u. s. 81 (curfew regulations); yakus v. united states, 321 u. s. 414 (emergency price control act); bowles v. willingham, 321 u. s. 503 (rent control), and korematsu v. united states, 323 u. s. 214 (exclusion of civilians from west coast military area). in hirabayashi v. united states, supra, ..... of the excess profits tax." affidavit of robert p. patterson, under secretary of war, sworn to august 3, 1945. and see hensel and mcclung, profit limitation controls prior to the present war, 10 law & contemp.prob. 187 (1943-1944). [ footnote 11 ] the following significant congressional hearings were publicly held: hearings before ..... raising and the support of the armed forces are essential. both require mobilization and control under the authority of congress. both are entitled also to such post-war relief as may be authorized by congress. the renegotiation act was developed as a major wartime policy of congress comparable to that of the selective .....

P.R. Chikka Subba Rao and ors. Vs. Nama Ramaswami Setty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant42; AIR1954Mys42; ILR1953KAR470; (1954)32MysLJ209

..... suits are not maintainable is wrong.9. the next contention on behalf of the tenants is that the plaintiff's suit for ejectment must fail as the mysore house rent control order, 1948, was extended to chintamani in respect of non-residential premises also sometime in 1940. this was long after the present suits were filed. we think from ..... none of them appear to have much regard for truth. they had given evasive answers but ultimately had admitted execution of the lease deeds and were clearly liable to act according to their terms. there is considerable force in these observations, which are well founded, and we accept as correct the findings of the munsiffs on all those ..... of re. 1/- per day.the defendants pleaded more or less uniformly. they alleged that the lease deeds were nominal and that they were not meant to be acted upon; they had come into possession as tenants earlier, before the plaintiff took up the management and were not liable to vacate and deliver over possession of the premises .....

M.R. Puttiah and anr. Vs. Mysore City Municipality and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant121; AIR1955Mys121

..... mysore act. the case is reported in -- 'globe theatres ltd. v. state of madras, ..... 4. as regards the constitutionality of section 20 of the act, a similar question arose in respect of section 13, madras buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1949. the scheme of that act is similar to the scheme of the mysore act, and the wording of section 13 of that act is identical with the wording of section 20 of the ..... has filed suits against them for eviction in the civil court which it would not have been able to do under the provisions of the house rent and accommodation control act, 1951. the petitioners contend that section 20 empowering government to grant exemption to a house or class of houses vests unregulated and arbitrary powers in .....

Gangappa and ors. Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1959Kant100; AIR1959Mys100; 1959CriLJ496; (1958)36MysLJ124

..... to the police to discriminate between the several accused. police might in some cases hold inquiries under sections 41, 45 and lay complaint under section 51 of the act. and thereby give the accused the benefit of section 252 of the criminal procedure code, whereas in other cases they may choose to hold an investigation under chapter xiv and ..... nothing wrong in the magistrate inquiring into or trying the case under that section.7. the learned counsel for the petitioners urged that section 51 of the mysore prohibition act being a special section, it over-rides the general provisions contained in the cr. p. c. i do not think that rule will apply in this case. ..... such offence and try the person accused thereof in like manner as if complaint had been made before him as prescribed in the code of criminal procedure 1898 (central act v of 1898)'this section contemplates a complaint by a police officer or a prohibition officer. 'complaint' is defined in section 4(h) of the criminal procedure code as .....

Trop Vs. Dulles

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the court has recognized that any statute decreeing some adversity as a consequence of certain conduct may have both a penal and a nonpenal effect. the controlling nature of such statutes normally depends on the evident purpose of the legislature. the point may be illustrated by the situation of an ordinary felon. a ..... be judged by the standards of the constitution. the judiciary has the duty of implementing the constitutional safeguards that protect individual rights. when the government acts to take away the fundamental right of citizenship, the safeguards of the constitution should be examined with special diligence. the provisions of the constitution ..... no longer one of ours. harsh as the consequences may be to the individual concerned, congress has ordained the loss of citizenship simultaneously with the act of voting because congress might reasonably believe that, in these circumstances, there is no acceptable alternative to expatriation as a means of avoiding possible embarrassments .....

Hospet Estate, Chickmagalur Vs. Its Workers (Karnataka Provincial Plan ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ95Kant

..... the employer to take him back in service but his request was not heeded. so the petitioner at the earliest opportunity approached the conciliation officer through the karnataka provincial plantation workers' union for redress. the conciliation proceeding ended in failure. the action of the employer second party being prompted with a view to punish ..... did not press the matter. the existing record and the testimonies of the parties' witnesses are evident that the management of the estate was in full control of the services of the workmen supplied by the labour recruiter. a mere supply of the labourers to the estate is not a proof that there was ..... workers of the respondent-estate are not the members of the karnataka provincial plantation workers' union (hereinafter referred to as the union). hence this dispute is at the most an individual dispute but not the industrial dispute as defined under the industrial disputes act (central act xiv, 1947). 7. secondly it was further submitted that there .....

B.N. Munibasappa Vs. Gurusiddaraja Desikendra Swamigal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1959Kant139; AIR1959Mys139

..... or rules 58. 90, 97 and 100 of order 2j of the code of civil procedure, or in procee'ings arising, as in this case, under the mysore, house rent and accommodation control act, the parties should be compelled to produce affidavits in proof of their cases without their being permitted to examine the witnesses in the ordinary way.26. that being so ..... or that the affidavit of any witness may be read at the hearing. the learned judge proceeded to point out that although as provided by section 1 of the evidence act that act is not applicable to the affidavits presented to courts, it does not mean that any affidavit of any person can go in as evidence proprio vigore . without necessity ..... an application had been made by a person who claimed to be his landlord for his eviction on the ground that he was in default in regard to arrears of rent payable by him. on 6-10-1956, an order was made in those proceedings ex parte, ordering the eviction of the tenant. the tenant, thereupon, made an application .....

H.V. Rajan Vs. C.N. Gopal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1961Kant29; AIR1961Mys29; ILR1960KAR151

..... the institution of the present suit as well as now, cinema theatres are not excluded from the mischief of the house rent and accommodation control act, 1951.under section 8 of the mysore house rent and accommodation control act, 1951, no tenant can he evicted whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, notwithstanding anything contained in any ..... a contingent agreement the contingency having not arisen, the agreement cannot be enforced; (iii) the agreement is frustrated as a result of the mysore house rent control orders and acts, (iv) the plaintiff is estopped from having recourse to exhibit d in view of the fact that he had utilised the amount of rs. 21, ..... possession during the renewed period; (ii) that he has become a statutory tenant of the suit property as per the terms of the mysore house rent control orders and acts. consequently he cannot be evicted except in accordance with the provisions contained therein; (iii) the compromise entered into by him and the first defendant is .....