Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 52 landlord and tenant to furnish particulars Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 103 results (0.130 seconds)

The Ideal Homes Co-operative Building Society Ltd., Bangalore Vs. P.i. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1976Kant1; ILR1976KAR75; 1975(2)KarLJ312

..... the discretionary jurisdiction of this court in that the petitioner had a speedy, adequate and efficacious alternative remedy under section 70 of the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act).4. the learned single judge, in effect, came to the conclusion that the managing director of the firm of builders referred to ..... the appellant, nothing to the contrary having been shown on behalf of the respondent.9. in the case of lingan gouda siddan gouda patil v. returning officer in karnataka central co-operative bank. (1963) 1 mys lj 204, a division bench of the court, held, inter alia, that any and every type of dispute arising ..... of all such facts and circumstances was called for, which could only have been possible in a regular enquiry held for the purpose under section 70 of the act, thus enabling the parties to adduce oral and documentary evidence for and against such an objection. further, the contents of the objection statement of vedavalli was neither .....

The General Manager, Mysore State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Devra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1027; 1976LabIC634; (1976)IILLJ306SC; (1976)2SCC862; 1975(7)LC929(SC)

..... his dismissal from service by order dated 29-10-1964 made by the divisional controller, mysore division. the appeal filed by respondent no. 1 before the general manager at bangalore was dismissed. he thereupnn, filed a write petition in the karnataka high court which was allowed on 16-10-1968.the appellant came up in ..... the mysore state road transport corporation in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of of section 34 of the road transport corporations act, 1950-hereinafter called the act, giving directions to the said corporation in relation to the recruitment, conditions of service and wages to be paid to the employees of the mysore ..... bangalore transport service (bts). there was a set of standing orders (it is not clear how they were framed) made under the industrial employments standing orders act of 1946.which was applicable to the transport system operated by mgrto. the bangalore transport company had similar standing orders applicable to its staff. the bts continued .....

Kenche Gowda Vs. the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1976Kant127; ILR1976KAR637; 1976(1)KarLJ124

..... the land in question was vested in the panchayat by notification issued under section 49 (1) of the karnataka village panchayats: and local boards act , 1959. it was not an absolute vesting it was placed under the control of the panchayat, and the government could at any time resume that land by notification issued under section ..... which has not been alienated. section 94(3) provides thus:-'notwithstanding anything contained in the karnataka public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1961 (karnataka act 3 of 1962), the person unauthorisedly occupying any such land shall also be summarily evicted by the deputy commissioner and any crop including ..... sites and r. a. tribunal (shetty j.) not in respect of gomal land. as far as i could see, section 94 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 is the only provision providing for eviction of unauthorised occupants of land which has been set apart for any special purpose or any unoccupied land .....

Mysore State Co-operative Printing Works Vs. Regional Provident Fund C ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1976KAR1233; 1976(1)KarLJ277; (1976)IILLJ300Kant

..... the printing works run under the name and style of 'the mysore state co-operative printing works ltd.' has been registered as a society under the karnataka co-operative societies act. i will call this establishment hereinafter as 'the society'. the grievance of the society in this writ petition is that it did not employ 20 workers ..... course of business of the establishment. such employment obviously would not include employment of a few persons for a short period on account of some emergency beyond the control of the company. this must necessarily require determination of the question in each case on its own peculiar facts ......' from the order of the commissioner, it is ..... l.l.j. 495 at 500], mathew, j., speaking for the supreme court observed at para 19 thus : 'in any skilled employment, to apply the test of control over the manner of work for deciding the question whether the relationship of master and servant exists would be unrealistic.' he further continued at page 504 : 'a person can .....

Sakina Bee Vs. Mohamed Ameer Saheb and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1976KAR1001; 1976(1)KarLJ365

..... a) and (f) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 21 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the act), on the ground that the appellant who was. his tenant has committed default in payment of rent and also unlawfully sublet the premises to respondent-2. the appellant and respondent-2 did not file ..... in the eviction proceedings, did not file their written statement or objections.6. the provisions of civil procedure code are made applicable to proceedings before court under the act. order 8 rule 5 of the code of civil procedure provides as follows:-'every allegation of fact in the plaint, if not denied specifically or by necessary ..... filed any written statement or objections to the eviction petition filed by the 1st respondent and were placed ex parte, the learned munsiff exercising jurisdiction under the act, could not have passed an order of eviction without the ist respondent placing evidence in support of his case.4.in this case, the eviction was .....

Rudrayya Vs. Gangawwa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1976KAR1151; 1976(1)KarLJ409

..... the petitioner. the respondents filed an eviction petition under section 21, clause (1), sub-clauses (b), (c) and (f) of the mysore rent control act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the act). the present petitioner contended, among other things that the application is not maintainable for the reason that the suit property was an agricultural land and ..... is that the finding in, c. r. p. 1759 of 1969 that the suit property is not 'premises' under the bombay act, operates as a bar under section 45 of the mysore rent control act to the present proceedings. since the petitioner has succeeded on the first point it is not necessary to consider this question. admittedly, ..... 1970) (mys) operates as a bar to the present proceedings under section 45 of the mysore rent control act. the present petitioner had filed an application for fixation of standard rent under section 11 of the bombay rents act alleging that the agreed rent of rs. 1,505 per annum was excessive and that rs. 750 per annum is the .....

Swaroop Singh and anr. Etc. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1655

..... of the code can hardly be of any assistance to mr. bhimraj.11. in the case of gangappa (1976 cri lj 575) (kant) the learned judge of the karnataka high court examined the provisions of section 209 in a different context whether the magistrate taking proceedings under that section has a power to discharge the accused and it was ..... .12. the arguments advanced by mr. bhimraj if accepted can create situations which may result in absurdity. suppose for one reason or the other which are beyond the control of the presiding officer if the magistrate cannot complete his study of papers produced before him under section 207 of the code then according to mr. bhimraj he cannot ..... by a court of session or not and in doing so, even though the magistrate does not (under the new code) record any evidence, yet the very act of examining the papers produced before him puts him to undertake some kind of inquiry necessitating ascertainment or verification of the fact whether the record makes out a case .....

Mathews Vs. Lucas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... allows these survivors' benefits to be allocated on grounds which have page 427 u. s. 523 only the most tenuous connection to the supposedly controlling factor -- the child's dependency on his father. i am persuaded that the classification which is sustained today in the name of "administrative ..... behalf of the children, again timely sought review in the district court, presenting the common law marriage question and asserting a constitutional challenge to the act. the district court affirmed the administrative conclusion of no common law marriage, and then turned to the constitutional questions that are the subject of this ..... 12. jimenez v. weinberger, supra, invalidating discrimination among afterborn illegitimate children as to entitlement to a child's disability benefits under the social security act, is similarly distinguishable. under the somewhat related statutory matrix considered there, legitimate children and those capable of inheriting personal property under state intestacy law, .....

Pullamma and ors. Vs. the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant9; ILR1976KAR1267

..... under order 9, rule 9, civil procedure code.2. the point for determination is whether the application r/w order 9, rule 9, civil procedure code is maintainable.3. the high court of karnataka in m. s. ramaiah v. special land acquisition officer, (1974) 1 kant lj 231 = (air 1974 kant 122) held that an application under order 9, rule ..... ) the question involved was whether the provisions of order xxii, civil procedure code were applicable to reference proceedings. on the assumption that the provisions of section 26 of the act left no choice to the reference court to dismiss the reference, it was held that once a reference is made, the court had to render an award and ..... the proceedings could not be dismissed for any reason whatsoever, for that it would tantamount to a refusal to award compensation for land compulsorily acquired under the act.14. in sahai's case : air1974pat176 (supra), a division bench of the patna high court relied on the aforesaid decision of the madhya pradesh high court .....

Syed Umer Saheb Vs. B.H. Santhkumaraiah and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant85; ILR1976KAR1405

..... under section 29 of the act. the decree passed by the civil court has not been fully satisfied though the landlord obtained a decree in his favour and took steps for execution of the ..... is executing the decree for recovery of arrears of rent does not preclude the landlord from securing appropriate relief under the provisions of the act. if the petitioner had paid all the arrears of rent in execution of the civil court decree, the petitioner could have placed that material before the court functioning under the karnataka rent control act to persuade it to dismiss the application filed .....