Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 34 sub tenant to be tenant in certain cases Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 2,466 results (0.122 seconds)

Smt. Thilothamma and anr. Vs. Smt. Rahmathunnisa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR4846; 2002(6)KarLJ368

..... file of xv additional small causes judge, bangalore. 2. the respondent-landlord filed the petition for eviction of the tenants under section 21(1)(f) and (j) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961). she put forth the case in the eviction petition that the husband of the first petitioner, one s.m.a. hameed was a tenant in a portion ..... . by virtue of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 70 of the act 1999 this revision is required to be considered under the provisions of the new act. the relevant provision reads as under: 'section 70. repeal and savings.--(1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961), is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisionsof section 69.- (a .....

A. Ekambara Vs. K. Leela

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2233; 1985(2)KarLJ246

..... tenant, if acquires a building suitable for carrying on such business, can avoid eviction under clause (p) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 21 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('the act'), merely because the building so acquired is intended to be used or is used for carrying on a different business, is the question which is raised for my determination ..... a tenant's liability for eviction from a tenanted building, if he acquired a suitable building either before or after the coming into operation of part-v of the act relating to control of eviction of tenants andobligation of land lords. when a claim for eviction is made by a land lord against a tenant under clause (p) above, what is required .....

Shahwar Basheer and ors. Vs. Veena Mohan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4732; 2004(3)KarLJ49

..... to recover possession of the premises without the need to take recourse to section 27 of the act.2. let me first refer to the background which has given rise to this question. the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('the repealed act' for short) provided for inheritability of tenancy by the legal representatives of the original tenant. the ..... the issue involved, i have to refer to section 70 of the present act which determines as to how the pending proceedings have to be dealt with under the present act. the provision reads:section 70 repeal and savings - (1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject ..... under section 70(2)(b) that all cases and proceedings pending at the commencement of this act before the court, shall be continued and disposed off by the court in accordance with the provisions of the act. the karnataka rent control act, 1961 is repealed in toto under sub-section (1) and under section 70(2)(b) .....

Naunihal Singh and ors. Vs. Alice Georgina Skinner and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1925All707; 92Ind.Cas.63

..... of such larger interest for a period of more than 12 years. in the matter of the mortgaged properties so transferred, it controls article 148 of the indian limitation act in the same way as it controls article 140. if the mortgaged property is in possession not of the mortgagee but in that of a transferee from him who claims ..... skinner, to secure this debt and a further loan of rs. 6,000 odd makes the mortgage of the 10th november, 1867, and places the mortgagees in complete control of the income of the mortgaged property and i recall here what their lordships of the privy council said regarding this arrangement. they said that the mortgagees were placed in ..... to have purchased larger interest therein for consideration, what a man is not allowed to do under article 148 of the indian limitation act he cannot .....

Korematsu Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that those of japanese ancestry (1) depart from the area; (2) report to and temporarily remain in an assembly center; (3) go under military control to a relocation center, there to remain for an indeterminate period until released conditionally or unconditionally by the military authorities. each of these requirements, it will ..... be noted, imposed distinct duties in connection with the separate steps in a complete evacuation program. had congress directly incorporated into one act the language of these separate orders, and provided sanctions for their violations, disobedience of any one would have constituted a separate offense. cf. blockburger v ..... including that, in which he lived. march 21, 1942, congress enacted [ footnote 2/3 ] that anyone who knowingly "shall enter, remain in, leave, or commit any act in any military area or military zone prescribed . . . by any military commander . . . contrary to the restrictions applicable to any such area or zone or contrary to .....

Lichter Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... enemy property); hirabayashi v. united states, 320 u. s. 81 (curfew regulations); yakus v. united states, 321 u. s. 414 (emergency price control act); bowles v. willingham, 321 u. s. 503 (rent control), and korematsu v. united states, 323 u. s. 214 (exclusion of civilians from west coast military area). in hirabayashi v. united states, supra, ..... of the excess profits tax." affidavit of robert p. patterson, under secretary of war, sworn to august 3, 1945. and see hensel and mcclung, profit limitation controls prior to the present war, 10 law & contemp.prob. 187 (1943-1944). [ footnote 11 ] the following significant congressional hearings were publicly held: hearings before ..... raising and the support of the armed forces are essential. both require mobilization and control under the authority of congress. both are entitled also to such post-war relief as may be authorized by congress. the renegotiation act was developed as a major wartime policy of congress comparable to that of the selective .....

Harisiades Vs. Shaughnessy

Court : US Supreme Court

..... which such determination shall be based, have been recognized as matters solely for the responsibility of the congress and wholly outside the power of this court to control. the court's acknowledgment of the sole responsibility of congress for these matters has been made possible by justices whose cultural outlook, whose breadth of view ..... of government as to be largely immune from judicial inquiry or interference. [ footnote 16 ] these restraints upon the judiciary, occasioned by different events, do not control today's decision, but they page 342 u. s. 590 are pertinent. it is not necessary, and probably not possible, to delineate a fixed and precise ..... abroad any reciprocal privileges or immunities. reform in this field must be entrusted to the branches of the government in control of our international relations and treatymaking powers. we hold that the act is not invalid under the due process clause. these aliens are not entitled to judicial relief unless some other constitutional .....

Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. Vs. Sawyer

Court : US Supreme Court

..... national health and safety in peacetime." "by the terms of the pending bill, the labor-management relations act of 1947 would be controlling in matters affecting the relationship between labor and management, including collective bargaining. it seems to me, however, ..... in terms, into a statute, rather than to have it authoritatively expounded, as it was, by controlling legislative history. by the labor management relations act of 1947, congress said to the president, "you may not seize. please report to us and ..... ]." accomplish said purposes." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. 606 of communica- no time limit. president may "use or control a. president proclaims that there none. president shall ascertain just tions act of 1934, 48 stat. . . . any such station and/or exists compensation and certify it to .....

P.R. Chikka Subba Rao and ors. Vs. Nama Ramaswami Setty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant42; AIR1954Mys42; ILR1953KAR470; (1954)32MysLJ209

..... suits are not maintainable is wrong.9. the next contention on behalf of the tenants is that the plaintiff's suit for ejectment must fail as the mysore house rent control order, 1948, was extended to chintamani in respect of non-residential premises also sometime in 1940. this was long after the present suits were filed. we think from ..... none of them appear to have much regard for truth. they had given evasive answers but ultimately had admitted execution of the lease deeds and were clearly liable to act according to their terms. there is considerable force in these observations, which are well founded, and we accept as correct the findings of the munsiffs on all those ..... of re. 1/- per day.the defendants pleaded more or less uniformly. they alleged that the lease deeds were nominal and that they were not meant to be acted upon; they had come into possession as tenants earlier, before the plaintiff took up the management and were not liable to vacate and deliver over possession of the premises .....

M.R. Puttiah and anr. Vs. Mysore City Municipality and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant121; AIR1955Mys121

..... mysore act. the case is reported in -- 'globe theatres ltd. v. state of madras, ..... 4. as regards the constitutionality of section 20 of the act, a similar question arose in respect of section 13, madras buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1949. the scheme of that act is similar to the scheme of the mysore act, and the wording of section 13 of that act is identical with the wording of section 20 of the ..... has filed suits against them for eviction in the civil court which it would not have been able to do under the provisions of the house rent and accommodation control act, 1951. the petitioners contend that section 20 empowering government to grant exemption to a house or class of houses vests unregulated and arbitrary powers in .....