Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 34 sub tenant to be tenant in certain cases Sorted by: old Page 7 of about 2,466 results (0.123 seconds)

Swaroop Singh and anr. Etc. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1655

..... of the code can hardly be of any assistance to mr. bhimraj.11. in the case of gangappa (1976 cri lj 575) (kant) the learned judge of the karnataka high court examined the provisions of section 209 in a different context whether the magistrate taking proceedings under that section has a power to discharge the accused and it was ..... .12. the arguments advanced by mr. bhimraj if accepted can create situations which may result in absurdity. suppose for one reason or the other which are beyond the control of the presiding officer if the magistrate cannot complete his study of papers produced before him under section 207 of the code then according to mr. bhimraj he cannot ..... by a court of session or not and in doing so, even though the magistrate does not (under the new code) record any evidence, yet the very act of examining the papers produced before him puts him to undertake some kind of inquiry necessitating ascertainment or verification of the fact whether the record makes out a case .....

Mathews Vs. Lucas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... allows these survivors' benefits to be allocated on grounds which have page 427 u. s. 523 only the most tenuous connection to the supposedly controlling factor -- the child's dependency on his father. i am persuaded that the classification which is sustained today in the name of "administrative ..... behalf of the children, again timely sought review in the district court, presenting the common law marriage question and asserting a constitutional challenge to the act. the district court affirmed the administrative conclusion of no common law marriage, and then turned to the constitutional questions that are the subject of this ..... 12. jimenez v. weinberger, supra, invalidating discrimination among afterborn illegitimate children as to entitlement to a child's disability benefits under the social security act, is similarly distinguishable. under the somewhat related statutory matrix considered there, legitimate children and those capable of inheriting personal property under state intestacy law, .....

Pullamma and ors. Vs. the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant9; ILR1976KAR1267

..... under order 9, rule 9, civil procedure code.2. the point for determination is whether the application r/w order 9, rule 9, civil procedure code is maintainable.3. the high court of karnataka in m. s. ramaiah v. special land acquisition officer, (1974) 1 kant lj 231 = (air 1974 kant 122) held that an application under order 9, rule ..... ) the question involved was whether the provisions of order xxii, civil procedure code were applicable to reference proceedings. on the assumption that the provisions of section 26 of the act left no choice to the reference court to dismiss the reference, it was held that once a reference is made, the court had to render an award and ..... the proceedings could not be dismissed for any reason whatsoever, for that it would tantamount to a refusal to award compensation for land compulsorily acquired under the act.14. in sahai's case : air1974pat176 (supra), a division bench of the patna high court relied on the aforesaid decision of the madhya pradesh high court .....

Syed Umer Saheb Vs. B.H. Santhkumaraiah and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant85; ILR1976KAR1405

..... under section 29 of the act. the decree passed by the civil court has not been fully satisfied though the landlord obtained a decree in his favour and took steps for execution of the ..... is executing the decree for recovery of arrears of rent does not preclude the landlord from securing appropriate relief under the provisions of the act. if the petitioner had paid all the arrears of rent in execution of the civil court decree, the petitioner could have placed that material before the court functioning under the karnataka rent control act to persuade it to dismiss the application filed .....

Ganapati Laxman Shet Vs. Sitabai Kom Ramdas Vernekar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant29; ILR1976KAR1415; 1976(2)KarLJ208

..... who are necessary parties to the writ petition.3. in the application filed by the respondent under section 21(1)(a) and (b) of the karnataka rent control act, for eviction of the petitioner before the munsiff at karwar, the petitioner raised the contention to the effect that he is not a tenant under the provisions ..... of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, but that he is an agricultural tenant governed by the provisions of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961. hence, two preliminary issues were framed by the learned munsiff in this behalf on which findings ..... recorded against the order was challenged of the rent control act, 1961, before the district judge at karwar. the learned district judge has .....

T.V. Govindaraja Iyengar Vs. B.R. Ramanna

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant77; ILR1976KAR1778; 1976(2)KarLJ252

..... is directed against the decision of the civil judge, bangalore in a petition under s. 43 (i) and (ii) of the karnataka rent control act for restoration of electricity, being an essential supply enjoyed by the tenant in the premises consisting of a room situated in o. t. c. road, chickpet area of ..... increased and thereby inferred that the landlord must not have thought of granting supply of electricity without any payment. besides the learned trial judge considered that arrears of rent bad fallen due and that would he a sufficient cause for discontinuance of the electricity. in my opinion all these circumstances never justified for any such inference that ..... electricity charges and that he used to receive only rs. 30/- per month. it was only subsequently when a separate meter was provided, that he asked for enhanced rent, so that he could make a separate charge for electricity supply. even after the fixation of the new meter, according to the respondent landlord, the supply of electricity .....

Bharatiya Samskrithi Vidhyapith, Bangalore Vs. G. Parthasarathy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant113; ILR1977KAR275; 1977(1)KarLJ87

..... order1. the petitioner in the civil revision petition under s. 50 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, is the respondent-tenant in h. r. c. no. 679 of 1975 on the file ..... a given case the document containing the 'previous statement' used for the purpose of contradicting a witness under section 145 of the evidence act may also otherwise be a piece of substantive evidence. in the present case apart altogether from the aspect that the petitioner tenant by alleging ..... is not a party requires to be kept sharply differentiated. the purpose of contradicting the witness under s. 145 of the evidence act is very much different from the purpose of proving the admission. admission is substantive evidence of the fact admitted while a previous statement ..... proved for this -purpose, it would not have substantive testimonial value.4. it is true that under s. 145 of the evidence act, a witness may be cross examined as to previous statements made by him in writing and relevant to matters in question; but if .....

Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Vs. A. Thakored ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant42; ILR1977KAR137; 1976(2)KarLJ285

..... the additional civil judge, bangalore district, bangalore, on an application filed by the respondents under section 18(3)(b) of the land acquisition act (central act i of 1894) as amended by the land acquisition (karnataka extension and amendment) act, karnataka act no. 17 of 1961. an extent of 2 acres 37 guntas of land situated at binnamangala manavarthakaval village and belonging to the respondents was ..... application can be made for a similar relief. section 18(3)(b) was introduced into the land acquisition act for the first time under the karnataka act 17 of` 1961 providing a statutory remedy to an applicant under section 18(1) of the land acquisition act whose application had not been referred to the court by the land acquisition officer within the period of .....

P. Kannaswamy Vs. B.L. Shankaranarayana Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant72; ILR1976KAR1792; 1976(2)KarLJ266

..... therefore, in my opinion, if the expression 'court' is used in rule 6, it refers as well, to a court notified under the karnataka rent control act, to decide petitions under section 21 (1) of that act.4. in view of rule 6, chap. vii, the limitations for filing the revision was only 90 days. there was an obvious delay ..... (1968) 1 mys lj 573. that case related to the application of mysore civil courts act (21 of 1964) to a court appointed under the karnataka rent control act with reference to its section 48. in that connection it was held that the court notified under the karnataka rent control act will not be of a civil court contemplated under the mysore civil courts ..... act (21 of 1964). as such, that decision shall not be an authority for interpreting the expression 'court' with reference to rule 6 of .....

K.S. Rangaiah Setty Vs. L.S. Vasudevamurthy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1977Kant50; 1976(2)KarLJ271

..... was brought on the record. it was contended before the learned munsiff that l. r. viswanath was not a tenant as defined in section 3 (r) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, as the schedule premises were non-residential and l. r. viswanath was not residing in the schedule premises along with his father. for this, assistance was taken ..... question will' of course be as to whether the present petitioner can be held to be a tenant under the karnataka rent 'control act. 1961. for this one has to refer to the dentition of 'tenant' as provided for in that act. the case of the present petitioner will fall under the very first part of that definition. he was certainly ..... the notice to quit was valid. but the difficulty is that the supreme court was dealing with the karnataka rent control act 1961 and the relevancy therein was of a notice to quit under section 106 of the transfer of property act. the decision of the supreme court being one under this very enactment and the importance of the notice .....