Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 25 licence for tapping for neera Page 4 of about 84 results (0.074 seconds)

Jan 24 2012 (SC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Air Craft Employees Coop.Society L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 16.17 and 17a of the karnataka compulsory primary education act, 1961 (karnataka act 9 of 1961); (ii) health cess under sections 3,4 and 4a of the karnataka health cess act, 1962 (karnataka act 28 of 1962); (iii) library cess under section 30 of the karnataka public libraries act, 1965 (karnataka act 10 of 1965); and (iv) beggary cess under section 31 of the karnataka prohibition of beggary act, 1975 (karnataka act 27 of 1975). 32. forming of ..... at any time, on further representation by the authority or otherwise, revise, modify or revoke an order passed under subsection (3). 67. amendment of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961.- (1) in the karnataka town and country planning act , 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963),- (a) in section 2, for item (i) of sub-clause (a) of clause (7), the following item shall be substituted namely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2017 (HC)

The State of Karnataka Vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... the revision petition filed by respondents 3 to 9 herein.2. the revision petition was filed by respondents 3 to 9 herein under section 56 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short, the act ) challenging the legality and correctness of the order dated 21.07.2014 passed by the deputy commissioner, bengaluru rural district, whereby the order dated 29.07 ..... given by the engineer on 23.04.2011, it was clear that the distance between the land and bbmp boundary was 19.10 kms. which meant that there was no prohibition for grant of land, and therefore, there was no impediment for the tahsildar to issue saguvali chit. the kat has found fault with the action of the deputy commissioner ..... light of categorical statement of law laid down in h.n.chandrashekar s case, after discussing 10 wp587892016 the effect of the judgment of the supreme court, what is prohibited under section 56 is a revision against the order that was impugned in the second appeal. if no second appeal is filed, then there is no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 2022 (HC)

Hasham Investment And Trading Company Private Limited Vs. India Awake ...

Court : Karnataka

..... on 7.2.2020 in the writ petition no.3635/2020, thereby he has given up all his professional ethics as contemplated under the provisions of the advocates act, 1961. being an advocate and party-in-person, accused no.2 has misused the process of the court and harassed the complainants and others repeatedly and wasted the precious ..... no.1/india awake for transparency which is a non-existing company amounting to abuse of process of law in wasting precious public judicial time. depsite warning and prohibition by the orders of the court, he filed several cases and continued the proceedings and his conduct is nothing, but daring ride on the court and mockery ..... this day the 23rd december, 2021. sd/- sd/- judge judge 11 charge we, justice b. veerappa and justice k.s. hemalekha, judges of the high court of karnataka, bengaluru do hereby charge you, accused no.3 named below: mr. p. sadanand, s/o panjala bikshapathi aged about44years, volunteer and authorised representative of india awake for transparency .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2003 (HC)

P. Venkataramana Vs. District Collector

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD1

..... he is deemed to be assignee of the subject land as viontive of the provisions of the a.p. assigned lands (prohibition of transfers) act, 1977 (hereafter called, 'the act') as illegal and non-est. though the impugned order was passed more than six years ago, having regard to the ..... interpretation of section 4 of the act. following the above i dismiss this writ petition but without costs.17. in papaiah v. state of karnataka, : air1997sc2676 , the supreme court considered the provisions of karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978. the appellants therein purchased the ..... assigned land under registered sale deed. the alienation by the assignee under the said act was declared void and inoperative. the act also provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2010 (HC)

Phool Singh and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... be deemed to have caused her death.explanation.- for the purposes of this sub-section, 'dowry' shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life ..... ingredient of section 304b ipc viz. demand for dowry is not established, the conviction of the appellants cannot be sustained.43. further in the case of narayanamurthy v. state of karnataka and anr. reported at : air 2008 sc 2377, it has been held as under:28. it is proved on record that deceased b.v.d. mani, father of ..... singh v. state of punjab reported at : (2001) 8 scc 633 : air 2001 sc 2828.24. counsel for appellants has also placed reliance on narayanamurthy v. state of karnataka and anr. : jt 2008 6 sc 466 and submitted that even otherwise a case of single solitary demand would not fall within the ambit of section 498-a ipc. counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2007 (HC)

The Management, Hindustan Motors Earth Moving Equipment Division Limit ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC31; (2007)IILLJ59Mad

..... 1987]2scr1189 [h.s. srinivasa raghavachar v. state of karnataka and ors.] in which it was held that section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 prohibiting legal practitioners from appearing in a proceedings before the tribunal constituted under that act as ultravires in the following lines:para 9: ... we ..... adopt the reasoning of the high court of punjab and haryana and direct that section 48(8) will not be enforced so as to prevent advocates from appearing before the tribunals functioning under the act ..... said provision.15. while striking down section 20-a of the haryana ceiling on land holdings act which prohibited the lawyers from appearing before any authority or officer functioning under that act and delivering the judgment on behalf of the full bench of the punjab and haryana high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and integrity of this document chandigarh crm-m-32262 of 2013 (o&m) -5- section 3 and 4 dowry prohibition act, 1961. learned state counsel submitted that offences under section 307 ipc, sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act were added on 09.09.2013 on the basis of supplementary statement made by the complainant. the complainant has also ..... offences under sections 406, 498-a, 323, 324, 506, 307 and 120-b of indian penal code (ipc) read with sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act, registered at police station balongi, district sas nagar mohali. prayer is made for restraining respondent no.1- state from taking/adopting any coercive measures including arrest of the petitioners ..... -facie case as per the ingredients descripted in different provisions of the indian penal code or any other penal law, is made out. . 5. in state of karnataka and another vs. pastor p. jitender kumar 2013.10.08 10:03 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm-m-32262 of 2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 2015 (HC)

State Vs. Sudesh Gulati and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... said word is normally understood. the evidence adduced by the prosecution does not, therefore, show that any demand for "dowry" as defined in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act was made by the appellants as what was allegedly asked for was some money for meeting domestic expenses and for purchasing manure. since an essential ingredient of section 304b ipc ..... viz. demand for dowry is not established, the conviction of the appellants cannot be sustained.43. further in the case of narayanamurthy v. state of karnataka and anr. reported at air2008sc2377 it has been held as under:28. it is proved on record that deceased b.v.d. mani, father of deceased jagadeshwari, gifted a ..... that the said demand of rs. 20,000/- was a demand of dowry under section 304-b of the indian penal code read with section 2 of the dowry prohibition act.56. as a final court of facts, the high court is entitled to reappraise the evidence and arrive at its own independent conclusion as to the guilt or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2003 (HC)

Hotel Bangalore International Limited, by Its Managing Director and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4295

..... if the said restrictions are imposed, it would defeat, violate and affect the very public morality and public interest. hence, the same is wholly impermissible and is opposed to the karnataka prohibition act, 1961 as well as the constitutional mandate of article 47. therefore, the amendment of rule 14, imposing restriction of lifting of minimum quantity of liquor in a month, by the holders ..... constitution of india, which makes it a fundamental obligation on the state to bring about prohibition of consumption of intoxicating drinks and therefore, no such compulsion finds a place anywhere either in the act or the rules framed thereunder. he submitted that moreover, the preamble of the karnataka prohibition act, 1961 states that 'whereas it is expedient to amend and consolidate the law relating to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2012 (HC)

G.M. Venkatareddy and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Distr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 1988 that they filed an application before the assistant commissioner under section 4 read with section 5 of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 inter alia praying for cancellation of the sale transaction and also restoration of the land in question ..... decisions declaring the sale transaction in favour of the appellants violates the provisions of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act 1 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the ptcl act for the sake of brevity).while we deal with the specific facts and contentions of ..... allottees. the government have allotted those lands as per saguvali chit containing prohibition of alienation of the land. subsequently, the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 was enacted totally prohibiting the alienation up to a particular period. the proceedings were initiated against .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //