Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 chapter i chapter i Page 45 of about 505 results (0.190 seconds)

Dwarika Prasad Pandey, Manager, Junior High School, Known as Shri Chan ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1529

..... union of india and ors., 1984 sc 802, the hon'ble supreme court held that article 21 read with articles 39, 41 and 42 provides for protection and preservation of the health and strength also of tender age children against abuse of opportunities and further provides for providing the educational facilities.5. in miss. mohini jain v ..... be generous or liberal in issuing such directions which in substance amount to directing the authorities concerned to violate their own statutory rules and regulations.'11. similarly, in karnataka state road transport corporation v. ashrafulla khan and ors., jt 2002 (1) sc 113, the hon'ble apex court has held as under:-'the high court under ..... . state of karnataka and ors., 1992 sc 1858 the hon'ble apex court while dealing with this issue held that without making 'right to education' under article 41 of the .....

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... trial or in the matters of environment, illegal stone quarries, illegal mining, pollution of air and water, clean fuel, hazardous and polluting industries or preservation of forest as in godavarman case (supra). while this court has laid down a chain of notable decisions with all emphasis at their command about the ..... they were prejudiced in that they could not effectively exercise their right under section 5a.160. in the decision reported in : air2006sc1846 , state of karnataka and anr. v. all india manufacturers organisation, the hon'ble supreme court observed that there was considerable time taken by the learned counsel for the ..... clj 595 [province of bengal v. satish chandra de and anr.]; : air2004sc390 [orissa industrial infrastructure development corporation v. supai munda and ors.]; : air2006sc1846 [state of karnataka and anr. v. all india . v. bombay environmental action group] in support of his such contention.72. mr. kalyan bandopadhyay, learned senior advocate appearing in w .....

Latha and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, By its Secretary and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... booth capturing and it was likely to lose the success of its candidates secured by committing an election offence if material piece of evidence was collected and preserved by holding polling- stationwise counting and such date being then made available to the election tribunal. such a dispute could have been raised before and ..... the offices of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha reserved for women, as far as possible, shall not be allotted for women, in the succeeding term.) 5. repeal:- the karnataka panchayat raj (reservation of offices of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha of zilla panchayat)rules, 1995 notified before, is hereby repealed. 6. the present writ petitions, i.e. ..... tribe (woman)' for president's post and 'general' for vice president's post under the impugned notification. 4. the challenge is that the relevant rules namely karnataka panchayat raj (reservation of offices of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha of zilla panchayat) rules, 2005, as amended from time to time upto 2016, framed for affixing such .....

Guruanna Vedi and anr. Vs. General Manager, Karnataka State Road Trans ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : III(2002)ACC350

..... appeals or proceedings pending before this court requested hon'ble the chief justice to constitute a larger bench to lay down law for its uniform applicability in the state of karnataka and to avoid difference of opinion amongst various benches.facts:on 28.3.1987, one pradeep wadi and his younger brother praveen kumar wadi were proceeding on hero honda motor .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... ) 2 scc 196, states that mere failure to lay the delegated legislation before the house of parliament does not affect its validity; (xxii) r. rudraiah and anr. v. state of karnataka and ors. (1998) 3 scc 23, explains the meaning of the phrase "for the removal of doubts" in the context of section 72(3) of 1966 act to say that .....

Dr. Vishwajeet Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2929

..... would not apply. the state government rejected the review petition filed by respondent, writ petition was filed by the respondent before the high court. the state of karnataka contended that even though the management was running only one college, it had different disciplines for which there were several lecturers. the college had to maintain roster for ..... aided private college owned and managed by a society. the college applied for approval of the appointment of the respondent which was refused by the state of karnataka on the ground that appointment has been made in violation of the roster policy and the respondent was appointed on a post which was reserved for scheduled castes ..... of 371 and reserving all for reserved category candidates violates rights of petitioners under articles 14 and 16(1) of the constitution of india.21. a full bench of karnataka high court in the case of dr. rajkumar and ors. v. gulbarga university and ors. : air 1990 kar 320, had occasion to consider similar issue. .....

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

..... ingredients of the products in question are mentioned in the authoritative book of ayurveda, the mere fact that the ingredients are purified or added with some preservatives, does not really alter their character.66. from the aforesaid settled legal proposition, it becomes evident that while deciding the case like instant, the statutory ..... the high court not to entertain the petitions on the ground of alternative remedy provided under the statute.18. preliminary objection in this regard was accepted by the karnataka high court in premier irrigation equipment ltd. v. union of india : 1998(100)elt29(kar) ; bombay high court in colour-chem ltd. v. ..... amplitude of the jurisdiction demands that it will ordinarily be exercised subject to certain self-imposed limitations.15. similar view has been reiterated in state of karnataka v. vishwabharathi house building cooperative society and ors. : [2003]1scr397 by the hon'ble supreme court observing that a court may entertain a petition notwithstanding .....

Prakash Amichand Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC468; 1985(2)SCALE1437; (1986)1SCC581; [1985]Supp3SCR1025

..... the land with the general object of controlling its development, securing proper sanitary conditions, amenities and conveniences such as public parks, play grounds, hospital areas etc., preserving existing buildings or other objects of architectural, historic and artistic interest and places of natural interest or beauty and generally of protecting existing amenities. the act is ..... in shantilas mangaldas's case for its survival. with great respect to the learned judges who decided kesavananda bharati's case and the case state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy, we are not prepared to hold that the decision in shantilal mangaldas's case is overruled by the bank nationalisation case which has ..... the learned counsel referred us to the decision in kesvananda bbarati v. state of kerala [1973] su. s.c.r. 1 and to the decision in state of karnataka and anr. v. ranganatha reddy and anr. : [1978]1scr641 in support of his plea that the decision in shantilal mangaldas's case (supra) stood overruled. .....

M/S Mspl Limited Vs. M/S S.B. Minerals and Another

Court : Karnataka

..... monumentation and verifying its correct position. a land surveyor, in short, is an investigator of evidence, and creates evidence on and under the ground to reference/preserve/perpetuate exiting evidence. in other words, the surveyor provides evidence that can be rules on by a judge in a court of law. it is in the ..... ore. iron ore deposit makes the magnetic needle of the instrument to deflect away, depending on the iron ore mass exposed. however combined lease sketch issued dmg, karnataka clearly shows common boundary between these two leases. yet again the committee having recorded conclusions, paragraph 8.4 reads thus: 8.4 in the absence of ..... preferably within five kilometres thereof; contuours at not more than 20 mtrs intervals; natural drainage system such as rivers, streams etc.; roadways and railways, forest with trees; boundaries of all villages and towns with their population, while, clause (g) mandates an environmental plan of the area of mining lease inclusive of the adjoining .....

Virender Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC496

..... natural flow of the river. this court said that the issue presented in that case illustrated the classic struggle between those members of the public who would preserve our rivers, forests, parks and open lands in their pristine purity and those charged with administrative responsibilities who, under the pressures of the changing needs ..... of 'statutory power rationally related to the protection of the residents of the locality from the ill-effects of urbanisation*2.*2. see for e.g. : -karnataka town and country planning act, 1961; maharashtfa regional and town planning act, 1966; bombay town planning act, 1954; the travancore town and country planning act, 1120 ..... this has not been controverted. under section 114 of the act it is the obligatory duty of the mahapalika to maintain public places, parks and plant trees. by allowing underground construction mahapalika has deprived itself of its obligatory duties to maintain the park which cannot be permitted. but then one of the obligatory .....