Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 chapter i chapter i Page 1 of about 505 results (0.172 seconds)

Mahadevaiah and Others Vs. the Tahsildar, Gundlupet Taluk, Mysore Dist ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2255; 1998(4)KarLJ394

..... day, no person shall fell any tree or cause any tree to be felled in any land whether in his ownership, occupation or ..... but also to report any injury or appropriation of such trees by whomsoever to the nearest revenue or authorised officer.7. the matter can be examined from yet another angle. the felling of trees except in accordance with the permission of the competent tree officer is prohibited by section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976. it provides that with effect from the appointed .....

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

..... three kilometers length of twenty feet width on steep slops, at times on slope exceeding 45 degree duly clearing the thick forest growth on his patta land in violation of karnataka preservation of trees act 1976, forest conservation act 1980, environmental protection act 1986 and rules there in. it was stated by sri ks sai baba, conservator of forests, chikmagalur circle that this ..... site owned by siddeshwara international, extending to about 280 acres consists of thick forest mostly on steep sloppy area. this area of 280 acres adjoins the yemmedoddi tiger preserve (section-4 notified forest under karnataka forest act 1963) on south -western side and surrounded by section-4 proposed area of about 2341 acres on east, north and western sides. the proposed area .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt Meenakshi Devi Avaru

Court : Karnataka

..... defined in section 2(ea) of the act with effect from 01/04/1993. they also referred and relied upon the provisions of the karnataka parks, play fields and open places (preservation and regulation) act, 1985, under which the said land in question is notified to be protected green park area and no construction thereon is ..... bangalore does possess, and thereby deserving in its own majesty, in public interest to be preserved as a monument with the surrounding open space developed to serve public purpose, into an exclusive botanical museum and horticultural garden and tree part and to serve also the acutely affected ecological needs of bangalore city which in its ..... anr. vs. smt. meenakshi devi avaru through lrs. and another 71/113 property and ecological considerations. the government shall be entitled to impose a condition that no tree in the palace property shall be cut during the period of use and no other activity involving hazards to the surroundings, buildings, land and the greenery in the .....

State Of Kerala Vs. M/s Popular Estates (now Dissolved)

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of private forest in the said act. it means, as aforestated, in relation to the erstwhile malabar district of the state of madras, land to which the madras preservation of private forests act applied immediately before 10-5-1971, being the appointed day under the said act, but excluding, inter alia, lands which are used principally for ..... relevant in this regard, is the madras act, of 1949. it applied25, to private forests in the districts of malabar and south kanara (now dakshina kannada district of karnataka) having a contiguous area of 100 acres or more. the act also applied26 to forests in estates, falling under the madras estates land act, 1908. forest was defined ..... appellant. look at the definition. sub-clause (a) refers to gardens or nilams as defined in the klr act. 'garden' means lands used principally for growing coconut trees, arecanut trees or pepper vines or any two or more of the same. 'nilam' means lands adapted for the cultivation of paddy. sub-clause (b) deals with what may .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... rather, the act demonstrates the sincerity of the respondents of their intention to acquire a unique, historical and architectural heritage of the state of karnataka in public interest and to preserve it as a monument.reg. other pleas86. it is submitted that as the impugned act was virtually a copy of the act no. 57/ ..... adjacent to the palace is intended to be used as the lung space and the park areas. the preservation of the palace as a monument, development of the open space into botanical museum, horticulture garden, tree park and preservation of the land as lung space and park areas clearly, unambiguously and categorically lead to the conclusion that ..... all or any of the following purposes, namely:i) maintenance, management and administration of the palace;ii) laying out and maintenance of public park;iii) preservation of tree growth in the premises of palace;iv) for development of botanical museum and horticulture garden in the palace premises;v) for payment of salaries and allowances of .....

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

..... against certain persons for the offences punishable under sections 85 and 86 of the karnataka forest act, 1963 (for short 'forest act') and karnataka forest rules, 1969 (for short 'forest rules') and section 8 r/w section 22 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (for short 'trees act') and under section 2(16) and section 9 r/w section 51 ..... 84 deals with the presumptions in case of sandalwood and section 85 deals with the responsibility of occupants and holders of land for the preservation of sandal trees. section 86 of the act lays down the procedure for levy of penalty for offence in regard to sandalwood. it is as under:86. penalty for offence ..... submitted that the vehicle in question was used in the commission of the offences. therefore, it was seized along with 4 logs of rain trees. the seizure was under section 62 of the karnataka forest act. the conditions imposed for interim custody of the vehicle is just and proper. the vehicle has been valued by the concerned regional .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant365

..... maintain art gallery-cum-museum in the name of dr. s. roerich and mrs. devikarani roerich; (c) to lay-out and maintain public park and to preserve tree growth in the estate; (d) to cultivate and protect linaloe crop in the estate; (e) to take all necessary steps for collection of paintings and art pieces ..... in office.. . . .member13. mr. v. v. anisimov, vice-president,russian indian arts club, moscow or his successor in office.. . . .member14.a person to represent the karnataka chitrakala parish at to be nominated bythe state government.. . . .member15.the executive officer. . . .member secretary(2) the board shall meet at such time, at such placeand ..... in various forms including immovable properties which was commonly known as 'tataguni estate'.2. the prayer in the present writ petition is to declare section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (in short 'land reforms act') and the roerich & devlkarani roerich estate (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 (in short the 'acquisition .....

K.T. Plantation Private Limited and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002(6)KarLJ27

..... art gallery-cum-museum in the name of dr. s. roerich and mrs. devikarani roerich;(c) to lay out and maintain public park and to preserve tree growth in the estate;(d) to cultivate and protect linaloe crop in the estate;(e) to take all necessary steps for collection of paintings and art pieces ..... successor in office. . . . member13. mr. v.v. anisimov, vice-president, russian indian arts club, moscow or hissuccessor in office. . . . member14. a person to represent the karnataka chitrakala parishat to be nominated by thestate government. . . . member15. the executive officer. . . . member-secretary(2) the board shall meet at such time, at such place and shall ..... in various forms including immovable properties which was commonly known as 'tataguni estate'.2. the prayer in the present writ petition is to declare section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (in short, the 'land reforms act') and the roerich and devikarani roerich estate (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 (in short, .....

S. Siddappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2757; 1998(5)KarLJ36

..... purpose they have been obtained. the state government thought it fit to empower the deputy commissioner of the district to preserve these lands having regard to the special circumstances. 5. the provisions of karnataka land revenue act and rules have been amended from time to time enabling the revenue authorities to find out extra ..... rural people. but, the very essence of village life consists in preserving the lands reserved under section 71 of the karnataka land revenue act, rule 108-i of the karnataka land revenue rules, 1966. we hardly find a plot consisting of a few well grown trees in the villages. those are the realms of the past. it ..... shall direct the respective panchayaths to protect and raise these gunduthopes situated in the respective villages and to further direct the tahsildar of the taluk to preserve the godown for free pasturage. the deputy commissioners shall take action through the tahsildar to evict persons who have been in unauthorised occupation of these reserved .....

P.M. Shameer and Another Vs. State of Kerala, Represented by Public Pr ...

Court : Kerala

..... ousting the jurisdiction of the magistrate court to issue an order granting custody of a vehicle. according to the learned counsel, the supreme court in the state of karnataka v. k.a. kunchindammed (air 2002 sc 1875) has held that the competent authority to order interim custody is the authorized officer under the act and not ..... ancestral right over it for its enjoyment and therefore, it is our hereditary obligation and duty to protect and preserve the same for the coming generation. thus, it is the constitutional obligation of the state to protect and preserve the forest and forest produce, not only for the present time but for the coming generation also. this ..... the dispute in the above decision and the present case is entirely different. there, the accused, against whom the allegation is that they had cut and removed certain trees from the forest, during the course of trial, insisted that the timber, which is seized by the forest officials, shall be produced before the court. accordingly, .....