Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka industries facilitation act 2002 section 15 certification Page 4 of about 23,791 results (0.186 seconds)

A. Vamana Acharya Vs. Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR541]; ILR2001KAR4896; (2001)IILLJ1184Kant

..... , quilon and another ; 5. union of india and others v dr. s. krishna murthy and others; 6. secretary, karnataka industrial co-operative bank limited v state of karnataka ; 7. g.k. thirunarayana iyengar v state of karnataka; 8. union of india and others v j. ahmed; 9. m/s. glaxo laboratories (india) limited v presiding officer ..... of bankers without obtaining prior permission from the competent authority and thereby allowing the said customer of the bank to open account in some other bank, facilitating diversion of funds from the respondent-bank, thus causing pecuniary loss to it to an extent of rs. 16.42 lakhs along with interest thereof. ..... shall be adjusted against the amount of gratuity payable. explanation.--in this chapter.--(a) the expression 'serious crime' includes a crime involving an offence under the official secrets act, 1923 (19 of 1923); (b) the expression 'grave misconduct'; includes the communication or disclosure of any secret official code or password or any sketch, plan, .....

Raheja Developers Limited vs.proto Developers and Technologies Limited ...

Court : Delhi

..... to submit that the supreme court had held that the bombay high court will not have jurisdiction to entertain a petition under section 34 of the act where an earlier petition under section 11 of the act had been filed before the high court of karnataka. in my view, ..... section 42 of the act would not stand attracted and this court, if it otherwise has jurisdiction to entertain the present petition, would not get denuded of such jurisdiction.6. counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in m/s bhandari udyog ltd. vs. industrial facilitation council and another, air2015sc1320 ..... jurisdiction as per section 20 of the cpc and was a court subordinate to the high court of karnataka. the fact that earlier petition which was under section 11 of the act, was filed in the high court of karnataka was only as a narration of fact to re- emphasis that even the earlier application u/s11had .....

Haryana State Agriculatural Mktg.Board Vs. Bishamber Dayal Goyal and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the jurisdiction of consumer forum in case of deficiency of services as has already been decided in u.t. chandigarh administration & anr. v. amarjeet singh & ors.[1].; karnataka industrial areas and development board v. nandi cold storage pvt. ltd.[2].. this court in narne construction (p) ltd. v. union of india [3]. referred to its earlier ..... different from a free public auction or an auction on as is where is basis . in such a scenario the appellant board as service provider is obligated to facilitate the utilization and enjoyment of the plots as intended by the allottees and set out in the allotment letter. in municipal corporation, chandigarh & ors. v. shantikunj ..... boundary walls have been carried out by the appellant-board. it was further submitted that the sanctioning of the business licence under section 10 of the said act pre- supposes that the state government notified the said area as a market area. it is further contended that the respondents are using the plots allotted .....

Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . the statement of objects and reasons of the said act reads thus:bangalore city with its population (as per last census) is a metropolitan city. different authorities like the city of bangalore municipal corporation, the city improvement trust board, the karnataka industrial area development board, the housing board and the bangalore ..... whichever is found feasible or suitable, should be made an integral process of the scheme of such acquisitions. if the government or development authorities act merely as facilitators for industrial or business houses, mining companies and developers or colonisers, to acquire large extent of land ignoring the legitimate rights of land-owners, it ..... repugnancy to the provisions of the existing law. this court in munithimmiah (supra) has held that the bda act is an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority to facilitate and ensure planned growth and development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto, and that acquisition of .....

Bhim Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... as nodal officers for the districts for entering the data in respect of the ongoing and completed works. this had facilitated substantial improvement in the data entry in the software. so far, data in respect of 1,006 mps has been ..... 1978) 1 scr 1; itc ltd. v. agricultural produce market committee : (2002) 1 scr 441; state of west bengal v. kesoram industries ltd. : (2004) 266 itr 721(sc)37. in this context, the scope of article 282 requires to be considered. article 282 allows ..... principle discernible as an essential attribute of federalism, even in the various examples of upper chamber in other countries.34. in state of karnataka v. union of india and anr. : (1977) 4 scc 608 in para 220 of the judgment, untwalia, j. ( ..... to achieve economic democracy and left that in the hands of future elected representatives.40. even under the government of india act, 1935 a similar provision was contained in section 150(2) under the heading 'miscellaneous financial provisions'. the constitution makers have .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... administration of the drug. as per the materials submitted before us, the behaviour exhibited by the subject during this stage has certain specific characteristics, namely:. it facilitates handling of negative emotional responses (i.e. guilt, avoidance, aggression, frustration, non-responsiveness etc.) in a positive manner.. it helps in rapid exploration and ..... . andhyarujina, sr. adv. who appeared on behalf of the central bureau of investigation (cbi) and mr. sanjay hegde, adv. who represented the state of karnataka. mr. dushyant dave, sr. adv., rendered assistance as amicus curiae in this matter.7. at this stage, it will be useful to frame the questions of ..... civil cases which could expose parties to adverse consequences. furthermore, questions have also been asked about the scope of the privilege being restricted to testimonial acts while excluding physical evidence which can be extracted through compulsion.98. in response to john wigmore's thesis about the separate foundations of the `rule .....

Md. Ashif and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... careful in ensuring that they do not interfere unduly with the economic arrangement of its affairs by the state or its instrumentalities or lend themselves the instruments to facilitate the bypassing of the constitutional and statutory mandates. 9. the above decision has been followed by this court in mohd. abdul kadir and anr. v. ..... governing such recruitment.8. the law regarding regularization of employees was on a comprehensive review authoritatively declared by a constitution bench of this court in secretary, state of karnataka and ors. v. uma devi (3) and ors. : (2006) 4 scc 1. this court in that case drew a distinction between an irregularity and ..... employment has come to an end or of ad hoc employees who by the very nature of their appointment; do not acquire any right. the high courts acting under article 226 of the constitution, should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption, regularisation, or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in .....

R.S.R.T.C. and ors. Vs. Deen Dayal Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... they do not amount to `statutory provisions' and any violation of these standing orders entitles an employee to appropriate relief either before the forum created by the industrial disputes act or the civil court where recourse to civil court is open according to the principles indicated therein. in bal mukund bairwa (2) : (2009) 4 scc ..... have been breached; (3) when the service of the employee is otherwise protected by a statute; and (4) where a right is claimed under the industrial disputes act or sister laws, termination of service having been effected in breach of the provisions thereof.39. the appellant corporation is bound to comply with the mandatory ..... of bombay and ors. : (1976) 1 scc 496, a three judge bench of this court considered section 9 of the civil procedure code, 1908, the provisions of industrial disputes act, 1947 and large number of decisions by this court, as well as english and other indian courts and summed up the principles applicable to the jurisdiction of .....

Naresh K. Aggarwala and Co. Vs. Canbank Financial Services Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... it was correctly observed by the special court that the plaintiff i.e. appellant herein is not entitled to make any claim either in relation to the reliance industries shares nor in relation to contract for sail shares. further as the appellant is not entitled to claim any amount from the respondent on account of the aforesaid ..... to unlisted securities was duly considered and rejected by the special court. the special court thoroughly considered the term `securities' as defined in section 2(h) of the act. it reads as under:2(h) securities include-(i) shares, scrips, stocks, bonds, debentures, debenture stock or other marketable securities of a like nature in or ..... that it is necessary to prevent undesirable speculation in securities in the whole of india, hereby declares that no person in the territory to which the said act extends shall save with the permission of the central government enter into any contract for the sale or purchase of securities other that such spot delivery contract .....

State of Orissa Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... article 131 of the constitution are entirely distinguishable from ordinary civil suits. an observation of y.v. chandrachud j., [as his lordship then was] in state of karnataka v. union of india : (1977) 4 scc 608, may amply clarify the position:165. in a civil suit the plaintiff has to succeed on the strength ..... there was no dispute with the erstwhile madras presidency. it was further stated that after the abolition of the jeypore (impartible) estate under the orissa estates abolition act, 1952, it was the government of orissa which collected land revenue from these villages. in fact, the plaintiff state has averred that when the constitution was enforced ..... jeypore (impartible) estate must be construed in view of the fact that the original zamindari had been included in the schedule to the madras impartible estate act ii of 1904. the holder of the estate made subsequent acquisitions which were geographically situated outside the original zamindari and the holders might not have intended the .....