Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 5 disqualification for office of membership Page 1 of about 179 results (0.172 seconds)

Shankar S/O Bhagwan Ambhore (Dr.) Vs. Vice Chancellor, Dr. Babasaheb A ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR522; 2007(1)BomCR521; 2006(3)MhLj835

..... that as a result of section 44(c) of the maharashtra universities act, 1994, disqualification from membership of any of the authorities of university, such as, senate, management council, academic council, board of examinations, faculties, board of college and university development, board of studies, etc., is a statutory effect and chancellor is ..... of board of studies and member of faculty of social sciences. the interpretation of section 44 of the maharashtra universities act, as is accepted by us, enables the competent authority to examine the eligibility of an aspiring candidate by ascertaining absence of disqualification. the disqualification having been incurred by decision ..... sub-section casts a duty on the vice chancellor to ensure that directives of the state government, provisions of the act and statutes are strictly observed and the decisions of the authorities, bodies and committees are properly implemented. sub-section (7) empowers the vice chancellor, in case of emergency, to .....

The Diocese of Mysore of the Roman Catholic Church, Mysore Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR627; 1998(6)KarLJ89

..... i went on answering them. when oneof the reporters asked me the question what is the purview of thekannada development authority, i said that as far as the operation of the kannada development authority act is concerned, in alighter vein i did say that everything under the sky and above theground in karnataka fall ..... within the karnataka developmentauthority's ambit. but, it was not my intention to say that thekannada development authority can have its jurisdiction overeach and every ..... that the deponent in his enthusiasm to discharge his function as the chairman of the kannada development authority should not make provocative statement. the 2nd respondent has been constituted under the kannada development act. the function of the authority for which the 2nd respondent has been constituted is as envisaged in section 15 of .....

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... entitled to compensation. it was further contended that insofar as the cases wherein plans were sanctioned prior to the karnataka urban development authority act, 1987 (for short, the kuda act ) came into force, the layouts were sanctioned/approved in accordance with the prevailing master plan which provided for road margin ..... and the assistant commissioner, krdcl, hdbrtsc office, 1st floor, ksfc building, rayapur, p.b. road, dharwad-580009.6. dharwad, haveri, gadag and uttar kannada district co-operative milk producers societies ltd., lakmanahalli industrial area, p.b.road, vidyagiri, dharwad -580004, represented by its managing director. respondents (by sri. gangadhar ..... ksfc building, rayapur, p.b.road, dharwad-580009. appellant (by sri. c. v. angadi, advocate) and:1. dharwad, haveri, gadag and uttar kannada district, co operatives milk producers societies ltd., lakamanahalli industrial area, p.b. road, vidyagiri dharwad -580004, represented by its managing director.2. the state of .....

K. Narayanaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4192; 1992(1)KarLJ582

..... has challenged the very same acquisition in an earlier proceeding as follows: (a) in the earlier proceeding the right of bangalore development authority under the bangalore development authority act to acquire the land was not questioned at all, therefore these two are two different causes of action. in such a case ..... the second writ petition would lie. in support of this kunwar ram nath and ors. v. municipal board, pilibhit, : [1983]3scr321a is cited. (b) in any event this point about the authority of the bangalore development authority ..... now therefore, in pursuance of the provisions of sub-section (1) and (3) of section 17 of the bangalore development authority 1976 (karnataka act no. 12 of 1971), bangalore development authority, bangalore hereby notify that the scheme has been made for the formation of a layout called 'banaswadi scheme between old .....

Kathuria Public School and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... not accepted and the review petition was dismissed. further, it was stated that several rulings of the supreme court, notably ntpc ltd. v. mahesh dutta 2009 (8) scc339 banda development authority, banda v. moti lal aggarwal 2011 (5) scc394and balwant narayan bagde v. m.d. bhagwat 1976 (1) scc700have indicated inter alia that there is no hard and fast ..... and possession was taken over on 31-03-1981. the suit lands were placed at the disposal of the dda by notification issued under section 22 of the delhi development act ( the development act ) on 19-05-1981 and 1706-1983.4. a preliminary issue was framed by the learned single judge who tried the suit filed before the court; by ..... respondents from taking any action towards dispossessing them. w.p.(c) 2009/2014 page 1 2. on 23.1.1965 a notification under section 4, land acquisition act 1894 ( old act ) was issued and on 26.12.1968 a declaration under section 6 was issued in respect of land measuring 80 bighas 7 biswas comprised in khasra nos. 1726 .....

K.A. Wadhwani Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3505

..... 210, vishal khand, gomti nagar, lucknow.we also direct opposite party nos. 3, 4 and 5, i.e., vice-chairman, lucknow development authority, officer on special duty, parks, lucknow development authority and assistant engineer, parks, lucknow development authority, lucknow, respectively to prevent misuse of the park in question in future.since we have directed opposite party no. 8, i.e., mr ..... about some encroachment in the park before house no. 3/210, vishal khand, gomti nagar, lucknow, only and the details of the encroachment, which the lucknow development authority always furnished, were not mentioned in the letter. in para 17 of the affidavit, it has been averred that the department had no knowledge that a marriage ceremony ..... compensation, it would be erroneous merely to go by the extent of damage to the park. we feel that the compensation should be such that it would act as a deterrent for others not to use the park in the manner or its like, as it has been used by opposite party no. 8, mr .....

A.V. Laxman Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2331; 1995(6)KarLJ620

..... it reads as under:'81b consequences to ensue upon the constitution of the bangalore development authority.- notwithstanding anything contained in this act, with effect from the date on which the bangalore development authority is constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 the following consequences shall ensue: (i) the bangalore development authority shall be the local planning authority for the local planning area comprising the city of bangalore with jurisdiction over ..... /cess or ring road surcharge, in the absence of any statutory power to do so under the planning act or under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short 'the bda act'). he further contended that even under provisions of the bangalore water supply and sewerage board act, there is no provision to levy any impost in respect of any capital work. the board is empowered .....

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and for quashing the notification s.o. 3348 (e) dated 17.10.2017, promulgated by respondent no.1 being ultra vires the power under the delhi development authority act of 1957, and in violation of article 14 and 21 of constitution of india;120. in addition to grounds urged in t.c. (c) 229/2020 ..... scheme in question was not an approved 40 (1990) 2 scc334transfer case (c) no.229 of 2020 page 72 of 179 scheme under the trust act, the development authority could not have dispensed with the procedure prescribed under section 50 of the adhiniyam.34. more direct and relevant is the decision in syed hasan rasul numa ..... lease. the principles of administrative justice squarely apply to such functioning and are subject to judicial review. the development authority, therefore, cannot transgress its powers as stipulated in law and act in a discriminatory manner. the development authority should always be reluctant to mould the statutory provisions for individual, or even for public convenience as this .....

U.P. Badminton Association Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2434

..... by the high court. the second area of controversy arose out of the order of the vice chairman, lucknow development authority, cancelling the earlier order dated january 31, 1985, granting permission under section 15 of the act in favour of the respondent lessees to develop the lease hold property by erecting thereon a multi-storeyed building called 'balrampur towers'.73. the controversy arose, as ..... the government brought to the notice of the then vice chairman, lucknow development authority what, according to the government, were serious illegalities in the sanction .....

R.K. Mittal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(2)SCC232; 2012(1)MLJ1143; 2012(1)SCJ747; AIR2012SCW390; AIR2012SC389

..... s. mudappa & ors. [(1991) 4 scc 54], wherein this court was concerned with the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 with particular reference to sections 33, 38 and 38(a) of that act. a site intended for a public park was sought to be converted into a hospital/nursing home, under the garb ..... such, they have also placed on record a list of hospitals being operated from residential blocks which have even been empanelled by the appellant development authority. the development authority is acting arbitrarily and not taking any action against those persons, though they have executed the lease deed with the same terms and conditions as the ..... alter the same without following due process of law. even where such an exercise is required to be undertaken by the development authority, there also it is expected of the development authority to act for the betterment of the public and strictly in accordance with the plans and the statutory provisions. it cannot take recourse .....