Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: allahabad Page 20 of about 422 results (0.129 seconds)

Hari Om Yadav S/O Shri Viddhya Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. Through Its ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC771

..... oh a misconception about the relationship of the provisions of parts ix and ix-a of the constitution with any legislation pertaining to industrial development. the gujarat industrial development act operates in a totally different sphere from parts ix and ix-a of the constitution as well as the gujarat panchayats ..... , it includes the ancillary powers for the election, nomination and other matters including disqualification for holding the. post of chairperson of a local authority as well as the settlement of dispute arising therefrom. the legislative powers of the state has not been curtailed by chapter ix of the constitution. in ..... correct that entry 5 list ii empowers the state legislature to legislate with respect to any subject relating to local government including the, constitution of such local authority. the constitution of panchayat, as provided in article 243b, and composition of panchayat in article 243c does not limit the powers of state legislature. in fact .....

Doctors' Sahkari Grah Nirman Samiti Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Avas Avam Vikas ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1984All234

..... by section 69 (d) of the adhiniyam and any subsequent change in the provisions of the act could not be availed of by the development authority. accordingly the powers conferred by sections 127-a and 135 of the respective acts which were subsequently inserted were not available to the development authority. while dealing with the legal implication and the provisions contained in section 69 (d) of ..... legislative intendment was not to incorporate the provisions contained in the m. p. municipal corporation act and m. p. municipalities act, in the adhiniyam but section 69 merely made a reference to the powers conferred by earlier act and intended that similar powers were exercised by the development authority as well. nothing contained in this judgment runs counter to the conclusion to which we have .....

Ram Chandra Shukla Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2728; (2001)3UPLBEC2351

..... the nature of punishment. the court/ tribunal in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to reappreciate the evidence and to arrive at its own independent findings on the evidence. the court/tribunal may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural ..... cross case has to be of the same time and place or almost the same time or place and consequently, it can under no case be a new development or a new ground which may come into existence subsequently. the district and sessions judge while rejecting the first ball application on 30.9.1994, had considered ..... onlythe third ground, viz., the non-furnishing of the documents asked for by the respondent. the tribunal seems to be under the impression that the inquiry officer/disciplinary authority is bound to supply each and every document that may be asked for by the delinquent officer/ employee. it is wrong here. their duty is only to supply .....

Virendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... beyond the permissible limit of 21%. moreover, this court has been informed during the course of hearing of other cases, particularly relating to u.p. tourism development corporation that in terms of the ratio of judgment of dharam pal singh chauhan, the state government has issued the govt. order no. 67/41-2010-230 ..... the purview of the service commission rules, 1992 ( for short 'the dpc rules, 1992). according to rule 17(2) of the service rules, 1983, the appointing authority is to prepare three eligibility lists for three categories of candidates namely (i) general category; (ii) scheduled castes, and (iii) scheduled tribes containing the names of ..... public office or post. as regards the percentage of reservation in the case of scheduled castes candidates besides scheduled tribes and other backward classes, section 3 of the act of 1994 would be relevant, which on reproduction reads as:3. reservation in favour of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes. - (1) in .....

Duncans Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2004All144

..... air 1981 sc 1368; dr. uma kant saran v. state of bihar, air 1973 sc 964; lekhraj sathramdas lavani v. n.m. shah, air 1966 sc 334; barellly development authority v. ajay pal singh, air 1989 sc 1076; radha krishna agarwal v. state of bihar, (1977) 3 scc 457 : air 1977 sc 1496 etc. he has also ..... gone wrong in law or they have been utterly unreasonable. otherwise we would get a conflict between the courts and the government and the authorities, which would be most undesirable. the courts must act very warily in these matters.' (see 'judging the world' by carry sturgess and philip chubb page 190)'.65. it must be ..... engaged in social or economic measures almost inevitably voters, legislators, and other elected officials will conclude that the activities of judges should be closely monitored. if judges act like legislators or administrators, it follows that judges should be elected like legislators or selected and trained like administrators. this would be counterproductive. the touchstone of an .....

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... v. state of maharastra : 2004crilj1359 ; icici bank and anr. v. municipal corporation of greater bombay and ors. : air2005sc3315 ; makhija construction and enggr. pvt. ltd. v. indore development authority and ors. : air2005sc2499 ; and shin-etsu chemical co. ltd. v. aksh optifibre ltd. and anr. : air2005sc3766 ).67. in jawahar lal sazawal and ors. v. state of ..... the legislatures so desire, the provision of anticipatory bail could be denied in grave cases of murder, dacoity, rape, abduction or prevention of corruption act, ndps act etc. well defined parameters for exercise of powers under section 438 cr.p.c. have been laid down in various decisions of the apex court ..... the investigation. that the powers of investigation fall within the exclusive domain of the police, and at this stage courts cannot intervene unless the police acts wholly without jurisdiction by seeking to investigate an non-cognizable offence without the permission of a magistrate, or where there may be some other statutory .....

Smt. Ram Dulari Devi and ors. Vs. Joint Director of Education and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1999)3UPLBEC2069

..... held in the case of sardar singh v. state of punjab, air 1991 sc 2248 (para 4). relying on the case of bhagawati prasad v. delhi state mineral development corporation, air 1990 sc 371, dr. padia contended that the question has to be seen at the time of initial entry and not subsequently and, therefore, the validity ..... the full bench cannot fall back on the over ruled decision when enforcement of appointments are sought for on the ground that appointments were not approved by the authority concerned. as such a stage it is not open to render a decision on the basis of over ruled decision and creates a legal right, which was otherwise ..... 1993 as is apparent from annexure-11 therefore, the management could not have assumed jurisdiction even to appoint the petitioner appellants as teachers under section 18 of the act. the vacancy was against substantive post of assistant teachers sanctioned on 2-4-1990. the alleged advertisement was issued in only one newspapers by the manager without mentioning .....

Kapil Dhawan Vs. Chhotey Lal Gaya Prasad Trust and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC831

..... block development committee and the panchayat samithi in the matter of the location of the primary health centre at dharmajigudem. his conduct, the acquiescence on the part of the other members of the committee and the treatment meted out to him by the authorities concerned support the inference that he was authorised to act on ..... interest of a trustee. that apart, in exceptional cases as the expression 'ordinarily' indicates, a person who has been prejudicially affected by an act or omission of an authority can file a writ even though he has no proprietary or even fiduciary interest in the subject-matter thereof. the appellant has certainly been ..... of its registration having been cancelled, making allegations against the appellant which were no more than the contents of the complaints filed by him before the authorities which had been found to be false after thorough investigation by the karnataka lokayukta, would unmistakably establish that the writ petition initiated by respondent nos. .....

Raj Kumar Soni and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3029

..... 12a. as they had purchased incomplete constructions (malwa) from mahanth govind das they completed the constructions according to the map sanctioned to mahanth govind das by the development authority, haridwar. they also paid circumstances and property tax to the zila parishad at the rate of rs. 1050 per annum, (the latest receipt of which appended as ..... valid, action could be taken only under the provisions of the u.p.z.a. and l.r. act ; that permanent constructions having been raised worth more than rs. 5 lacs after due sanction by the development authority the lease/licence is irrevocable ; that they had inherited the rights of mahanth govind das in whose favour the ..... have even ignored it collaterally or declared it null and void.21. the act of mutation authorities were not binding on the collector of the district or on the state. mutation does not create any title.22. grant of sanction by the hardwar development authority to the petitioners was/is not binding either on the state or on .....

Hari Singh Vs. Governor, U.P. (Registrar General) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)2UPLBEC1456

..... the discharge of his duties or that he failed to act honestly or in good faith or that he omitted to observe, the prescribed conditions which are essential for the exercise of the statutory power.'8. thus, the aforesaid judgment is an authority that disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against an employee in respect ..... quasi-judicial power negligently having adverse affect on the party or the state certainly amounts to misconduct.18. in m.h. devendrappa v. karnataka state small industries development corporation : [1998]1scr919 , the hon'ble supreme court has ruled that any action of an employee, which is detrimental to the prestige of the institution ..... of exerciser of judicial review, may interfere by appreciating the evidence only if there is an omission on the part of the enquiry officer or the disciplinary authority to consider the relevant evidence. similarly, in rajendra kumar kindra v. delhi administration : (1984)iillj517sc , the court observed as under:-'it is equally well .....