Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: allahabad Page 43 of about 422 results (0.133 seconds)

Aug 28 1998 (TRI)

Dr. B.C. Sikroria and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad

..... various principles in fixing the pay scales of various posts and cadres in the government service. it has been further held that vetenary assistant surgeons working in the office of development commissioner, delhi, desparity between their pay scale and pay scale of similar persons in employment of central government and union territory of chandigarh claiming for equal pay prima-facie legitimate ..... .8a. though the said supreme court authority relates to equal work for equal pay but on adopting the same principle with other posts were kept in similar pay scale and later on by a government decision a ..... 1. this is an application under section 19 of the administrative tribunal act, 1985 for a declaration that the fixation of pay of small industries promotion officer (which is later referred as sipo) at rs. 1640-2900 under iv central pay commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2010 (HC)

Vijay Karan Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... the aforesaid orders and ultimately vishwanath gupta succeeded in getting charge as the head of the institution in 2002. 18. it is at this stage that another development took place which has to be noted before proceeding to record the facts in relation to the present writ petition. 19. certain teachers of the same ..... the institution. it is noteworthy that sri vishwanath gupta had not been arrayed as a defendant when the aforesaid interim injunction was obtained by impleading the college authorities only. subsequently, vishwanath gupta was impleaded on 4th april 1984. he filed writ petition no. 13307 of 1984 questioning the grant of injunction by the civil ..... the post to be still vacant. apart from this, there is no decision taken by the educational authorities including the joint director of education or the district inspector of schools who are empowered under the 1982 act read with the rules framed thereunder to justify sending of the requisition to the board for selection and appointment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //