Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: allahabad Page 11 of about 422 results (0.087 seconds)

Mar 06 1998 (HC)

Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Others</B>

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1201

..... ; a. venkata subbarao u. stale of andhra pradesh, air 1965 sc 1773 ; bimal chandra banerjee v. state of madhya pradesh, air 1971 sc 617 ; ahmedabad urban development authority v. sharad kumar jayanti kumar pasawalla and others. air 1992 sc 2038 : ganpati singh v. state of ajmer and another, a/r 1955 sc 188 ; salonah tea company ..... charge could be issued under the act and the rules famed thereunder. the law is well-settled that the power to tax or levy any compulsory charge cannot be inferred from mere generality of the provisions contained in enabling enactment. hon'ble supreme court in case of ahmedabad urban development authority v. sharad kumar jayanti kumar pasawalla ..... and others (supra), has held that in a fiscal matter it will not be proper to hold that even in the absence of express provision, a delegated authority can impose tax or fee. such power of imposition of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2008 (HC)

Udai Nath S/O Sri Hari Das Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secreta ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2008All180

..... petitioner has urged that the amendment made in rule 10 being contrary to the provisions of section 6(1) of the central act, mines and minerals [regulation and development] act, 1957 (in brief the act) is ultra vires and is liable to be struck down. the learned counsel urged that it creates monopoly with regard to ..... or the documents mentioned then the applicant shall also furnish noin sub-rule (1) the district officer or the objection certificate of the followingofficer authorized by the state authorities:government in this behalf, shall, by (i) authorised officer of the incomefifteen days notice require the applicant by tax department,to complete the application ..... a certificate issued by districtofficer or by such officer as may be officer or by such officer as may beauthorized by the district officer in this, authorized by the district officer in thisbehalf, showing that no mining dues are behalf, showing that no mining dues areoutstanding against the applicant: outstanding against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2007 (HC)

Public Sector Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (Saravjanik K ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1697

..... - pi, greater noida made in favour of the petitioner society.2. the facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the respondent no. 2, greater new okhla industrial development authority, (hereinafter called the 'greater noida') invited applications for allotment of two group housing residential plots - one plot was reserved for allotment in favour of cooperative housing society consisting of members ..... and its decision become binding upon the persons concerned. government includes, both the central government as well as the state government, if considered under the provisions of the general clauses act, 1897. therefore, the government is an impersonal agency concept including all its administrative and secretarial officers. government is a part of the body politic having three independent functionaries as its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2005 (HC)

Daya Ram S/O Ram Deen Upadhaya Vs. Up Zila Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC1046

..... an order therein for such correction or inclusion as prayed. though, no limitation is prescribed under any of the aforesaid two rules, the assistant development officer (panchayat) is obliged to act within a reasonable time.8. in the present case, the petitioner had alleged forgery by the gram pradhan, who entered the name of his ..... the parties were heard at length even on the question o maintainability and after holding that a naked eye perusal of the records showed interpolation, the appellate authority after holding that the appeal was maintainable allowed the appeal by; a reasoned order. this appellate order 29.3.1997 was never challenged by the respondent no. ..... by the respondent no. 5 and the original record was summoned by the appellate court. after the parties had filed their detailed written submissions, the appellate authority after detailed discussions allowed the appeal vide order dated 2.9.3.1997 and directed deletion of the name of respondent no. 5 from the family register. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2014 (HC)

Anand Kumar Sharma Vs. State Of U.P. Thru' Secretary and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 48. in union of india v. hindustan development corporation, this court observed thus:(scc pp.540-41, para 29) "it has to be noticed that the concept of legitimate expectation in administrative law has now, ..... , where the citizen may legitimately expect to be treated fairly. as lord bridge has explained: westminister cc, (1986) ac 668 at 692. the courts have developed a relatively novel doctrine in public law that a duty of consultation may arise from a legitimate expectation of consultation aroused either by a promise or by an established ..... a policy decision is required to be given a retrospective operation, it must be stated so expressly or by necessary implication. the authority issuing such direction must have power to do so. the board, having acted pursuant to the decision of the state, could not have taken a decision which would be violative of such statutory directions. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1975 (HC)

Group Industries Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1975All434

..... their business and if any government takes 51% share in such a corporation, it is only to further the object of that corporation, i.e. to provide developed building-sites to the public. the share of the government cannot be a basis of any classification for exemption. the nature of such corporation remains-indefinite and such ..... limit'. section 6 of the ceiling bill requires every individual owning urban property in excess of the ceiling limit at the commencement of that act to file a statement before the competent authority having jurisdiction specifying the location, value and such other particulars as may be prescribed of all the urban properties owned by him in the ..... of the share capital of which it has assisted indirectly as provided in chapter vi of the uttar pradesh co-operative societies act, 1965, or any apex society within the meaning of that act or any co-operative land development bank; (v) any widely held company: (vi) a banking company as defined in clause (f) of section 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1987 (HC)

Yashwant Stone Works Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1988All121

..... in public interest the union could take under its control the regulation of minesand development of minerals to the extent provided therein. the state government, after the declaration of the central government under section 2, became a delegated authority. it has been empowered to frame rules relating to minor minerals by section 15 ..... the granting of leases alleged to have been imposed under the forest (conservation) act, 1980 (act 69 of 1980), hereinafter referred to as '1980 act'. 2. in 1957, the parliament in order to provide for the regulation of mines and the development of minerals under the control of the union, enacted the mines and minerals ..... purposes, prior approval of the central government would be needed. mining operations would clearly be covered by the explanation appended to section 2 of the 1980 act. the explanation includes 'any purpose other than reafforestation'. mining operation is definitely a purpose other than reafforestation. for what no permission or approval of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1958 (HC)

Ford and Macdonald Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1959]10STC70(All)

..... wood, cement etc. in the case of some of these contractors the supply of the materials had been arranged for by the public works department or by the development board. the value of the materials used in connection with those contracts had not been included in their turnovers by the contractors. the sales tax officers had, therefore ..... state and brought the controversy to a close. in view of it further discussion on the point appears to be unnecessary. the opinion of the sales tax authorities that, the building materials used by the applicants in connection with their contracts were liable to be assessed cannot therefore be, upheld.4. the distinction sought to ..... there was sale by the contractors of the building materials used in construction ?(2) whether they (assessees) are dealers within the meaning of the u.p. sales tax act ?(3) whether the turnover of building materials cannot be assessed separately from the labour charges, if their cost is not separately shown in the bills ?(4) whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2004 (HC)

Kanpur Agra Transport Company and ors. Vs. Amar Jeet Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2127

..... nagar and are keeping the premises in question locked and are no longer using it for their business purposes. the respondent no. 1 alleged that kanpur development authority had allotted a plot to the petitioners at a nominal premium with a condition that they shall shift their entire transport business to the transport nagar, which ..... application under section 21 of the act was not maintainable. the petitioners further contended that even though they had shifted their business to the transport nagar, their booking office continued to function from the premises in question. it was urged that no such condition was imposed by the kanpur development authority that the petitioners will shift their ..... , j.1. this writ petition has been filed by the tenant for the quashing of the judgment dated 1.9.1986 passed by the prescribed authority under u.p. act no. 13 of 1972 and the appellate order and judgment dated 15.7.1987 passed by 8th additional district judge, kanpur nagar, allowing the release .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2000 (HC)

Smt. Shyam Sakhi and Others Vs. State Election Commission, U.P. and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2786; (2000)3UPLBEC2097

..... as unopposed were wrongly rejected. those candidates submitted complaints to the district magistrate and on such complaints, the district magistrate asked for a report from block development officer and the returning officer. he constituted an enquiry committee consisting of the district saving officer, assistant registrar co-operative and district panchayat officer to submit ..... election. he purported to have exercised power under article 243t of the constitution of india. article 243t of the constitution of india does not empower any authority to set aside an election. it provides for reservation of seats for the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes in every municipality and reservation for women etc. ..... the nirvachan adhikari may reject any nomination paper on anyone or more of following grounds : (a) that the candidate is not qualified under the act to be chosen to fill the seat ; (b) that the candidate is disqualified for being chosen to fill the seat under section 13 or section 26 of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //