Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: kerala Page 9 of about 5,054 results (0.306 seconds)

Aug 29 2006 (HC)

Shima Kuttappan Vs. Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT617

..... being filed before this court against the universities in the state making unsubstantiated or speculative allegations. the observations made above are intended only to alert the authorities concerned to take effective steps to curb this pernicious tendency.23. coming back to the writ petitions on hand, i am satisfied that the decision taken ..... acts which in its view, are necessary for the effective control, management and administration of the affairs of ..... to note that sub-clause (x) of sub-section (2) of section 14 of the act empowers the syndicate 'to exercise any of the powers of the university not specifically conferred on any of the authorities under this act and the statutes'. the above provision undoubtedly clothes the syndicate with the power to do all such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1999 (HC)

Sree Balaji Pipes and Accessories Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2006]143STC578(Ker)

..... such statutory bodies having their independent corporate identity as bodies distinct from the government departments, though, such bodies may withstand the test of being 'state' being 'other authority' for the purpose of article 12 of the constitution of india.in view of the above, there is no merit in the contention raised by the assessee that ..... a certificate in duplicate in the form in annexure i obtained from the purchaser. fifth schedule, item 2 is central government and state government departments. kerala water authority not being a department of government of kerala, the assessee cannot claim any reduction in the rate of tax for the reason that it has been selling these ..... sold by the assessee are declared goods coming under the second schedule to the kerala general sales tax act and therefore, liable to be taxed at 4 per cent and that since the sale is exclusively to the kerala water authority, assessee is entitled to exemption as per the provisions contained under s.r.o. no. 1728 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2005 (HC)

Baby Mathew Vs. G.C.D.A.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT39

..... second party. the land acquisition officer is also empowered under section 16 of the kerala land acquisition act to make an award. greater cochin development authority later paid the balance amount on various dates. pursuant to the notification issued under the act, second respondent passed award no. 28 of 1983 in l.a.c.no. 46/1982 on ..... elamkulam west extension scheme, wanted to acquire the said property. notification under section 3(1) of the land acquisition act was issued on 21.11.1978. secretary of the gcda and late mathew entered ..... passed under section 16 of the kerala land acquisition act is entitled to get the benefit of section 28a of the land acquisition act, 1994.2. sri. t.p. mathew was the owner of 71 cents of land in survey number 1013/1 of ernakulam village. the greater cochin development authority (in short, 'gcda') for the purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 1996 (HC)

State of Kerala Vs. Dr. P. Nallathampi thera and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1997Ker181

..... extended time. (ii) the state shall immediately communicate copies of this order to the revenue divisional officers of all the districts for compliance. (iii) the authorities under the act; i.e., the revenue divisional officers of the concerned districts shall file affidavits before this court once in a month showing the progress achieved in the disposal ..... this court granted time. on 9-8-1996, an affidavit was filed by the principal secretary, revenue and sc/st development, practically informing this court that there was not the will to implement the act or the writ, directions and orders issued by this court or to keep up the assurance given to this court by ..... dt. 8-8-1996 re-emphasises this position and consequently this court is compelled to act to bring succour to the unorganised, depressed and oppressed tribes. 7. in the affidavit dt. 8-8-1996, the principal secretary, revenue and sc/st development after referring to the persistent earlier directions of this court has stated : '7. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2006 (HC)

John Vs. Kalamassery Municipality

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT386

..... functions, including carrying out conservation of water and implementation of ground water resources development as part of minor irrigation. viewed in the said angle, it cannot be assumed that the municipality is powerless to act in the situation, particularly when it had authority, when there is material before it in the form of ext. r1(a ..... section 2(1), has to apply for being registered with the state ground water authority. none has a case that the state ground water authority has not been constituted. the petitioners admittedly do not have the registration under the ground water act.11. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the decision of this court ..... ), to act upon. ext. r2(b) reflects consideration of relevant materials by a competent authority and there is no reason why such report ought not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2006 (HC)

St. Mary of Leuca English Medium School Vs. Dy. Director

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(3)KLT760

..... affiliation to the university. therefore, i am of the view that recognition of educational institution by the state government as stated ins.207(1)(c) of the act is not always recognition under the ker, even though schools recognised under chapter v of the ker are entitled to exemption. wherever statutory recognition is not called ..... contended that petitioner being a recognised school is entitled to exemption from property tax in respect of school, buildings unders.207(1)(c) of the panchayat raj act. government pleader on the other hand contended that only recognised schools are entitled to property tax exemption in respect of the buildings and in this regard he ..... tax by the second respondent in respect of a school building after declining exemption claimed by the petitioner under section 207(1)(c) of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 vide exts.p3 and p5. even though there is no response from the second respondent, the government pleader appearing for the first respondent argued covering .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2005 (HC)

Antony Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT69

..... to, only to understand how the object sought to be achieved has been understood even by the rule making authority. therefore, even the rules framed for the purpose of in pari materia provisions in the act are in accordance with the view that has been taken above, to the effect that the provision that the ..... of on its reverse.7. section 157(9a) was introduced by act 11 of 1999, namely, the kerala local authorities (prohibition of defection) act, 1999, hereinafter referred to as the 'anti-defection act', by which various provisions were made to prevent defection among members of local authorities in the state of kerala and to provide for disqualification of the ..... defecting members for being members of the local authorities. to achieve the said object, among other things, the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 has been modified as provided for in the 1st schedule to the anti-defection act.8. the identity of the voter will have to be ascertained for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2006 (HC)

Santhosh George Vs. Mathai

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT584

..... of the petitioner void on the ground that the petitioner is an employee working in model engineering college, thrikkakara, run by the institute of human resources development for electronics ('ihrde' for short) which is a corporation fully controlled by the government of kerala and hence disqualified to contest the election for grama panchayat ..... contended that-the 1st (first) respondent is an employee working in the model engineering college, thrikkakara run by the institute of human resources development for electronics (ihrde in short), which is a corporation fully controlled by the state government for the purpose of section 30 (thirty) of the kerala panchayat ..... of a panchayat.in this connection provision contained in section 30 of the kerala panchayat raj act is very relevant. section 30 of the kerala panchayat raj act reads as follows:30. disqualification of officers and employees of government, local authorities, etc.-(1) no officer or employee in the service of the state or central .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2010 (HC)

Mary Sam. Vs. Kozhenchery Grama Panchayat, and ors.

Court : Kerala

..... nuisance or pollution. it is also stipulated that the village panchayat shall after considering the application and the reports of the secretary, and of such other authorities as specified in sub-section (4), grant the permission either absolutely or subject to such conditions as it thinks fit to impose or refuse the ..... granting or refusing permission under sub-section (3), the village panchayat shall obtain and consider the report of the inspector of factories appointed under the factories act or of an officer of the industries department not below the rank of industries extension officer having jurisdiction over the area regarding the adequacy of ventilation, ..... ext.p6 by the district medical officer of health, pathanamthitta is sustainable or not. sub- section (1) of section 233 of the kerala panchayat raj act stipulates that no person shall, without the permission of the village panchayat and except in accordance with the conditions specified in such permission, construct or establish any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2015 (HC)

Bharati Telemedia Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Rep. By Secretary and Other ...

Court : Kerala

..... tantamount to undoing equality [see: state of u.p. v. deepak fertilizers and petrochemical corporation ltd. - [(2007) 10 scc 342; roopchand adlakha and others v. delhi development authority and others -[(1989) 1 supp. scc 116]; union of india and others v. n.s.rathnam and sons - [2015 (322) elt 353 (sc)]. in the instant ..... granted license to provide direct-to- home (dth) broadcasting service by the government of india under section 4 of the telegraph act, 1885 (central act 13 of 1885) and indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (central act 17 of 1933) and providing such service within the state. (fd) luxury provided by direct-to-home (dth) broadcasting ..... cable operators against the aforementioned judgment was pending before the supreme court, the state legislature retrospectively amended the proviso to section 4 (1) of the act to exclude cable operators whose total number of connections, including those given through franchisees, was seven thousand and five hundred or less, from the ambit of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //