Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: karnataka Page 9 of about 15,251 results (0.159 seconds)

Naganna (Deceased) by L.Rs and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Other ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3503; 1998(5)KarLJ658

..... . society for medical education and another v special land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority and others wherein this court, while considering the provisions of the bangalore development authority act (hereinafter referred to as 'the bangalore development authority act') had held that section 11a of the act applies to the acquisition under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act. he also relied upon the decision of the supreme court in the case ..... sites; and thereafter a notification dated 28th of january, 1991 came to be issued in exercise of the power conferred on the development authority under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act (hereinafter referred to as 'the authorities act'). the petitioners/their predecessors-in-title had filed objections for formation of scheme on the lands in question. after consideration of the .....

B.S. Muddappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant87; ILR1989KAR3027; 1989(2)KarLJ540

..... is also not in dispute that by a notification dated 3-1-1973 issued by the state government in purported exercise of its powers under sec. 23 of the improvement act, (since repealed and replaced by bangalore development authority act, 1976 which came into force with retrospective effect from 20-12-1975 hereinafter referred to as the b.d. a ..... ' as defined in s. 2(b) of the b.d. act, from the subsequent amendments made to it by the amendment act, 1984. s. 2 of the amendment act provides as follows:'2. amendment of s. 2, -- in s. 2 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (karnataka act 12 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as the principal act), after cl. (b) the following clause shall be inserted .....

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industrial Area Develo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2848; 2008(1)KarLJ164; 2007(4)KCCRSN258; 2007(4)AIRKarR395(DB).

..... .ft. area can be utilized, i.e., 53% of the area has to be utilized for purposes of residential sites as provided under the provision of karnataka development authority act of 1987, the remaining 47% of the area of land shall be utilised towards developmental purposes, if the lands are used for residential layout. for formation of ..... to be read as rs. 10,50,000/- by placing reliance upon the judgment of the supreme court in : air1985sc1576 paragraph 3 and also : [2003]1scr522 (ghaziabad development authority v. anoop singh and anr.) : air2002all94 (ran singh and ors. v. state of u.p.) contending that amended application may be allowed by this court in exercise ..... state government in favour of kiadb for purpose of formation of industrial estate as defined under section 2(7) of the karnataka industrial area development act, 1966 (hereinafter called as the 'kiadb' act'). it is not in dispute that the acquired lands along with the other lands were designated lands under section 69 of the kt & .....

Urban Development Authority Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... by a learned single judge of this court whereby writ petitions filed by the respondents challenging the acquisition of land under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 were allowed and the acquisition proceedings initiated by the appellant quashed.2. a large extent of land measuring about 69 acres 181 ..... bench has while examining the question whether section 11a of the land acquisition act had any application to acquisition proceedings under the city improvement boards act or under the bangalore development authority act or for that matter under the karnataka urban development authorities act, has relied upon the decision of the supreme court in munithimmaiah v. ..... 5 years, had lapsed and therefore, could no longer be resurrected by the appellant-authority nor any further action taken on the basis thereof.5. section 27 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, runs thus:'authority to execute the scheme within five years.-- where within a period of five years from .....

A. Rajendra Naidu Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2844; 1999(1)KarLJ16

..... . neither the learned high court government advocate nor the learned counsel for the b.d.a. are able to point out any provision under the bangalore development authority act under which the state government has exercisedthe power and cancelled the allotment made by the b.d.a.. a faint attempt was made to bring this case ..... within the purview of section 63 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 which in my considered view is not applicable to the allotment at all. section 63 of the b.d.a. act deals with the revisional powers of the government against any order made in any proceeding. allotment ..... .' to dispose of stray sites in accordance with the guidelines issued by the government. the said rule reads thus.-'5. allotment of stray sites: the bangalore development authority shall dispose of stray sites in accordance with the guidelines issued by the government'.4. by circular dated october 17, 1992, the state government issued revised guidelines .....

K.N. Kamalamma Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KarLJ658

..... by the respondent/bda for the purpose of formation of layout and distribution of sites in accordance with the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (in short referred to as 'the act'). it is the case of the petitioner that while forming layouts, the respective sites on which some buildings were constructed had been ..... the petitioner has drawn our attention to section 38-c of the act which reads as under:38-c. power of authority to make allotment in certain cases.-notwithstanding anything contained in this act or in any other law or any development scheme sanctioned under this act, or city improvement trust board, bangalore has already passed a ..... with non obstante clause which states that notwithstanding what is contained in the act, the authority can reconvey the sites which belongs to it or vested in or acquired by it for any development scheme. the site could be reconveyed by the authority provided it is not practicable to include such a site for the purpose .....

Aicoboo Nagar Residents Welfare Association Vs. Bangalore Development ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR4705; 2002(6)KarLJ260

..... of petrol and diesel outlet is not a civic amenity within the definition of civic amenity in section 2(bb) of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short 'the bda act') and even assuming that there is notification, only opening of petrol outlet would be civic amenity and not petrol and diesel outlet. ..... j. 1. these two writ petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india, as public interest litigation petitions challenge the lease granted by first respondent-bangalore development authority in favour of m/s. bharath petroleum corporation, the second respondent, in respect of civic amenity site no. 3 (part), btm i stage, i phase ..... into in these petitions that too in the absence of relevant material in that behalf and these facts can be considered by a competent fact-finding authority and accordingly, we hold that petitioners are not entitled to any relief in these public interest litigation petitions and accordingly, these public interest litigation petitions .....

B.K. Annappa Vs. the Urban Development Authority, Hassan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1147; 1998(6)KarLJ310

..... is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed with prayer referred to in para 1 above.7. the authority has been constituted under section 3 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 (in short the 'act'). section 12 of the act provides that the government shall appoint an officer not below the rank of 'group a' officer to be the commissioner of ..... '.18. in the personal affidavit filed by the respondent-commissioner, it has been revealed that.-'i submit that there are no regulations framed by this authority and approved by the government under section 72 of karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 governing day-to-day activities of the department. it is true on reading of the provisions under sections 51 and 52 of the .....

The Secretary, Committee of Management, Sree Siddalingeswara Swamy Shr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR3034; 2002(3)KarLJ262

..... the bigger site made under its order at annexure-b, dated 9-8-1994 had been fully cancelled by following the relevant procedure prescribed under bangalore development authority act, 1976 ('the act of 1976' in short) or under any of the relevant provision of the rules and regulations made thereunder. in that view of the matter, ..... the required legal formalities in this regard have been complied with. 3. it is not in dispute that as required by the relevant rules of the bangalore development authority (allotment of civic amenity sites) rules, 1989 ('rules of 1989' in short), an application in the prescribed form for allotment of a civic amenity site ..... petition, the petitioner-temple institution seeks issuance of writ of certiorari and quash the allotment letter dated 3-8-1998 at annexure-k of respondent 1-bangalore development authority('bda' for short), by which the petitioner was informed that an alternative site measuring 467 sq. mtrs. for community hall, described therein, was allotted to .....

M.R. Narayan Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(3)KarLJ576

..... developmental schemes in relation to which the notification had been issued under either of the acts namely bangalore development authority act, 1976 or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement board act, 1976 and the notification should have been published, but the property has not vested ..... by then in any authorities for which acquisition is proposed to be made. the 4th condition is that the ..... was acquired by the city improvement trust board in 1970 and the land stood vested in it and city improvement or bangalore development authority in which land stands vested the authority under the act. in this view of the matter, it appears that it is not open to this court to issue writ of .....