Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: karnataka Page 14 of about 15,251 results (0.204 seconds)

Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority.

Court : Karnataka

..... .751/200 4 the appellant-company is a public sector undertaking of state of karnataka. respondent-mysore urban development authority is also a creation of the state of karnataka under the karnataka urban development authority act,1937.2. facts leading to this case are as hereunder: mysore urban development authority filed the suit to recover a sum of rs.1,03,00,000/- which is said to ..... charges of rs.1,000/-, in all rs.1,39,88,682/-according to the plaint averments, in respect of two residential lay-outs formed by the plaintiff-mysore urban development authority viz., rajiv nagar iii stage (devanur iii stage), sathagalli ii stage in mysore .and kanduvinahalli layout in nanjangud entrusted the work of electrification to the defendant-company and on the .....

Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

..... .no.751/2004. the appellant-company is a public sector undertaking of state of karnataka. respondent-mysore urban development authority is also a creation of the state of karnataka under the karnataka urban development authority act,1937. 2. facts leading to this case are as hereunder: mysore urban development authority filed the suit to recover a sum of rs.1,03,00, 000/- which is said to ..... charges of rs.1,000/-, in all rs.1,39,88,682/-according to the plaint aerments. in respect of two residential lay-outs formed by the plaintiff-mysore urban development authority viz., rajiv nagar iii st age (deveinur iii st age) , sat hagalli ii stage in mysore and handuvinahalli layout in nanjangud entrusted the work of electrification to the def enfant .....

Sri M.Gopal Reddy S/O Late Rm.Repdy Vs. the Commissioner Bangalore Dev ...

Court : Karnataka

..... and 4 as preliminary issues, issue no.3 is with regard to the maintainability of the suit land for want of notice under section 64 of the bangalore development authority act. issue no.4 is as to whether the suit is maintainable in view of the acquisition of the land. issue no.3 was held in favour of ..... illegal interferences and obstructions by the defendant?(3)whether the suit of the plaintiff is bad for want of the statutory notice under section 64 of the bangalore development authority act 1976 to the defendant?(4) whether the defendant proves that the suit schedule property is duly acquired by the defendant in accordance with and as such the ..... name. thereafter, the property wans assessed to the corporation tax on 1.10.1999 under section 143 of the karnataka municipal corporation act. he has paid f.24,120/-towards betterment charges. bangalore development authority claiming that the land has been acquired in 1960-61 tried to interfere with the possession of the suit schedule property by the .....

V. A. Narasimha Reddy and Others Vs. Government of Karnataka, Urban De ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the name of petitioner no. 3 respondent no 2 herein issued a preliminary notification on 07.11.2002 under section 17(1) of the bangalore development authority act (for short the bda act) proposing to acquire total extent of 1532 acres 17 guntas of land in the villages vaajrahalli, hosahalli, uttarhalli manavarthi kaval, b.m. kaval, ..... outside those for promotion of which the power is vested the court calls it a colourable exercise and is undeceived by illusion.in greater noida industrial development authority versus devendra kumar and others manu/sc/0806/2011 it is held as under:we are not unmindful of the plight of large number of persons, ..... manifest that no uniform policy is adopted. the authorities adopted to pick and choose method for deletion of certain lands for extraneous considerations.20. the bda act is a special law for acquisition of land for planned development of bangalore city. any scheme formulated under the act shall specify the immediate need, extent of lands required .....

Dr. S.M. Kalligudd and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(1)ALT(Cri)123; 1998(1)KarLJ252

..... schedule shall have the jurisdiction in respect of the offences under the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976, the bangalore development authority act, 1976, the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, the bangalore water supply and sewerage act, 1964, the karnataka slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1973 and read with chapter ii, section 34, indian penal code along with relevant ..... , 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 477a of indian penal code, and sections 54, 55, 56, 94, 98, 113 and 114 of the karnataka police act, 1963'.3. clause (s) of section 2 of criminal procedure code under which the above notification issued by the state government 'police station' to mean any post or place ..... , dated 27th may, 1996 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (s) of section 2 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974), the government of karnataka hereby declares that with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the official gazette the place specified .....

Abdul Rehman and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2003Kant311; 2003(4)KarLJ148

..... matter has been considered today.4. as stated, the question about the applicability of the provisions introduced by the land acquisition amendment act under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act has been considered by this court in khoday distilleries limited, bangalore v. state of karnataka and ors., : ilr1997kar1419 and the ..... of karnataka and ors., : [2002]2scr825 5. the learned counsel submits that the provisions of the city improvement boards act are identical to the provisions of the bangalore development authority act and therefore the controversy has already been set at rest by the decision of the apex court, which is applicable to ..... of the supreme court as stated above. the provisions of the land acquisition amendment act, 1984 amending sections 6 and 11a would not ipso facto apply to the provisions of the bangalore development authority act and the urban development authority act. accordingly, the reference is answered.the writ appeals shall now be placed before .....

Abdul Rehman and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR2282

..... matter has been considered today. 4. as stated, the question about the applicability of the provisions introduced by the land acquisition amendment act under the provisions of bangalore development authority act has been considered by this court in khoday distilleries limited vs . state of karnataka, : ilr1997kar1419 and the same has been approved by ..... karnataka and ors., ilr 2002 kar 3023. 5. the learned counsel submits that the provisions of the city improvement boards act are identical to the provisions of the bangalore development authority act and therefore the controversy has already been set at rest by the decision of the apex court, which is applicable to ..... the decision of the supreme court as stated above. the provisions of the land acquisition amendment act, 1984 amending sections 6 and 11a would not ipso facto apply to the provisions of bda act and urban development authority act. accordingly, the reference is answered. the writ appeals shall now be placed before the appropriate .....

A. Gopal Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

1. petitioner has sought for declaration that the entire proceedings initiated by the second respondent under sections 17 and 19 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 are null and void in respect of the petitioners land bearing sy.no.55/6 of hennur village, kasaba hobli, bangalore measuring 120 feet x 480 feet. he .....

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. R. Ramachandran

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR116; 1993(1)KarLJ1

..... in the course of the said ten suits that the possession of the said land has been taken over and handed over to the engineering section, bangalore development authority on 22.6.1988 after completing all the formalities. defendant also pointed out in the course of its written statement that the compensation amount was deposited in ..... is alleged by them that they have erected a structure in their respective sites and that they have been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property. bangalore development authority that is to say, the defendant, however, started interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit property. it is under these circumstances, each one of ..... cause the publication in two daily newspapers circulating in the locality also. section 17 of the b.d.a. act reads as under: 'procedure on completion of scheme (1) when a development scheme has been prepared, the authority shall draw up a notification stating the fact of a scheme having been made and the limits of the .....

Karnataka State Judicial Employees' House Building Co-operative Societ ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR2115; 1994(3)KarLJ124

..... by the society since the layout in question is a private layout formed by the co-operative society concerned.5. there is no provision in the bangalore development authority act enjoining that each and every time a site has to be allotted in a private layout sanctioned by the b.d.a., the said site has to ..... same shall be registered if only they produce the following documents:1) no objection certificate from registrar of co-operative societies;2) release certificate from the bangalore development authority (bda for short)3. in the said circular there is a warning to the concerned sub-registrars that if they were to register any document presented by ..... the impugned circular is quashed.11. the learned government pleader pleaded that while allowing the petition no costs be imposed. despite rulings of this court, if the authorities concerned persist in issuing circulars, in contumacious disregard of the law laid down by this court, thus compelling the parties to file writ petitions putting them to .....