Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 15 academic committee Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 50,925 results (0.330 seconds)

M/S Ncr Developers vs.university of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... for any reason that was not possible, there could not be any reference for arbitration at all. in essence what the condition says is that the foundation of the arbitration agreement itself is appointment by the executive director, in the manner contemplated. if this condition which is fundamental to the arbitration agreement itself ..... has relied upon the following judgments of this court as well as the supreme court: i. nandyal coop. spinning mills ltd. v. k.v. mohan rao (1993) 2 scc654ii. nav nirman construction company v. executive engineer cd-ix, irrigation and flood control department, gnctd2011scc online del 3948 iii. indian oil corporation ltd. v. ..... supplied) 16. pertinently, in ansal buildwell limited case (supra), this court in a petition filed by the aggrieved party under section 11(6) of the act noticed the arbitration clause containing a similar condition upheld the right of the respondent to appoint the arbitrator and declined to appoint an independent arbitrator holding as under .....

M. Sankaranarayanan Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, ...

Court : Chennai

..... with identical averments, would contend that the writ petitions are not maintainable. according to the learned counsel, kalakshetra foundation is an autonomous body under the ministry of culture, government of india and it is governed by the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993. the recruitment to various posts in the foundation is governed by the recruitment rules. it is further stated that there is only one post of deputy ..... director exists in the foundation which is next to the post of director. it is an important administrative post. the .....

Sai Sankar, Asst. Professor in Music, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai and Other ...

Court : Chennai

..... foundation for its administration, to make provisions for further development of kalakshetra in accordance with the aims and objects for which kalakshetra was founded, the central government came out with an act known as the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as the act]. as per section 4 of the act, on the commencement of the act ..... , the right, title and interest in relation to the assets and properties of kalakshetra specified in ..... office, whether the resignation could be allowed to be withdrawn by the central government. 20. admittedly, there is no provision in the kalakshetra foundation act enabling the director to resign or providing for acceptance of resignation or withdrawal of resignation. therefore, one has to seek recourse to the .....

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , sagard. the heads of the following non-government membersorganisations:1. janadhwani vedike,field marshal kariappa road, somwarpet2. vrukshalaksha andolana seva trust, sagara3. nature conservation foundation, mysoree. the following eminent conservationists, membersecologists, and environmentalists:1. k.b. girish ganapati2. keregundi estate, devapura post,gonekoppa3. sanjay gubbi, tumkur4. girija ..... safeguards were taken by government of india in 1980 by constituting tiwari committee, which recommended for establishment of department of environment to act as a nodal agency for environment protection eco-development in the country, for comprehensive review and recommendations, not covered by the ..... appointing honorary wildlife wardens. the latest order appointing honorary wildlife wardens was issued on 22-02-2007 and 02-08-2007.wildlife act, section 21 - final notification -government of karnataka has issued final notifications for all the 5 national parks and 21 wildlife sanctuaries .....

Sadhu Singh S. Jiwan Singh Vs. Shamsher Singh Josh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1965P& H457

..... the full support of akali dal. those who cast their votes in favour of s. shamsher singh josh, they will get true happiness of the guru and make the foundation of the punjabi suba strong. khalsa j you should remember at shri guru kalgidhar, the tenth guru demands your votes for protection of the sikhism and for getting punjab suba ..... through the evidence and the judgment of the learned tribunal. in common with court s of appeal this court also under s. 116a of the representation of the people act does not reverse conclusions of fact based on oral evidence merely on the ground that a different conclusion than the one arrived at by the election tribunal might well have ..... religious elections in our set-up. but we are here only concerned with the intention of the parliament in enacting s. 123(3) of the representation of the people act, and this provision only taboos appeal for a vote on the ground of the candidate's religion or language, and if the appeal does not encroach on the prohibited .....

The Bank Of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the case of cocanada radhaswami bank ltd4. reliance was also placed on the central board of direct taxes (for short, the cbdt ) circular no.665 of 1993. g. it was also pointed out that though banks are required to maintain slr by investing amounts in specified securities, as long as banks maintain a specified ..... salt owners' society in the bombay presidency for the time being registered under the cooperative societies act, 1912 (act 2 of 1912), the bombay cooperative societies act, 1925 (bombay act 7 of 1925), or the madras cooperative societies act, 1932 (madras act 6 of 1932), or the dividends or other payments received by the members of any such ..... trading assets of the business and the income therefrom was income from the business. the answer to this question depends upon the scope of section 6 of the act. section 6 of the act classified taxable income under the following several heads : (i) salaries; (ii) interest on securities; (iii) income from property; (iv) profits and gains .....

Omkar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... equality and non- discrimination. in this context, it would be apposite to 30 remember r.m. lodha, j's (as he then was) observation in sunanda bhandare foundation v. union of india, (2014) 14 scc383 where he stated : (scc p. 387, para9) 9. in the matters of providing relief to those who are ..... medical commission will issue, an inclusive attitude will be taken towards persons with disabilities from all categories furthering the concept of reasonable accommodation recognized in the rpwd act. the approach of the government, instrumentalities of states, regulatory bodies and for that matter even private sector should be, as to how best can one ..... to be followed by the states parties for empowerment of persons with disabilities. the convention laid down the following principles for empowerment of persons with disabilities, which the act seeks to implement:- (i) respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one s own choices, and independence of persons; (ii) non- .....

Shingara Singh Vs. Daljit Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in the above background, this court observed the following in para 12: 12. the principles specified in section 52 of the tp act are in accordance with equity, good conscience or justice because they rest upon an equitable and just foundation that it will be 3 (2006) 13 scc60812 impossible to bring an action or suit to a successful termination if alienations ..... decree for specific performance on the ground that since defendant no.2 is the owner in possession of the suit land upon execution of the sale deed dated 08.01.1993, defendant no.1 has left with no right or title of the suit land. thus, he is unable to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff ..... 4. defendant no.2/appellant filed his separate written statement stating that defendant no.1 has sold the property to him by executing a registered sale deed on 08.01.1993 and delivered possession after which mutation has also been carried out. according to the appellant/defendant no.2, the agreement, basing which the suit is filed, is a .....

Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kr. Sharma Vs. The State Of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... above analysis indicates that the prosecution has failed to discharge its burden to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. the reasonable doubts, indicated above, are irreconcilable and strike at the foundation of the prosecution s case. thus, the appellants are liable to be acquitted of all the charges. criminal appeal no.1031/2015 and others page 25 of 2637. in ..... fleeing away in a jeep and he identified them as the accused persons. thus, pw4 entered the scene after the commission of offence and he did not witness the act of abduction. the testimony of pw2 strengthens the doubt as he deposed that when they reached the police station after the incident with pw18, neither him nor pw4 in- ..... pw18 near the well in order to eliminate any 4 hereinafter referred as crpc criminal appeal no.1031/2015 and others page 8 of 26 chances of resistance in the acts committed by the other five accused per-sons. submissions12 on behalf of a-6 and a-7, it is submitted that there was no motive for the said .....

Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the judicial review of administrative action. 94. the principles deducible from the above are: (1) the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. 1 (1993) 1 scc4452 (1994) 6 scc65120 (2) the court does not sit as a court of appeal but merely reviews the manner in which the decision was made. ..... was grossly arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. as held earlier, the government bodies/ instrumentalities are expected to act in absolutely fair, reasonable and transparent manner, particularly in the award of contracts for mega projects. any element of arbitrariness 24 or discrimination may lead to ..... ; or whether the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say: the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached; (ii) whether public interest is affected. if the answers are in the negative, there should .....