Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 11 the governing board Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 5,331 results (0.178 seconds)

Sai Sankar, Asst. Professor in Music, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai and Other ...

Court : Chennai

..... foundation for its administration, to make provisions for further development of kalakshetra in accordance with the aims and objects for which kalakshetra was founded, the central government came out with an act known as the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as the act]. as per section 4 of the act, on the commencement of the act ..... , the right, title and interest in relation to the assets and properties of kalakshetra specified in ..... office, whether the resignation could be allowed to be withdrawn by the central government. 20. admittedly, there is no provision in the kalakshetra foundation act enabling the director to resign or providing for acceptance of resignation or withdrawal of resignation. therefore, one has to seek recourse to the .....

Sadhu Singh S. Jiwan Singh Vs. Shamsher Singh Josh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1965P& H457

..... the full support of akali dal. those who cast their votes in favour of s. shamsher singh josh, they will get true happiness of the guru and make the foundation of the punjabi suba strong. khalsa j you should remember at shri guru kalgidhar, the tenth guru demands your votes for protection of the sikhism and for getting punjab suba ..... through the evidence and the judgment of the learned tribunal. in common with court s of appeal this court also under s. 116a of the representation of the people act does not reverse conclusions of fact based on oral evidence merely on the ground that a different conclusion than the one arrived at by the election tribunal might well have ..... religious elections in our set-up. but we are here only concerned with the intention of the parliament in enacting s. 123(3) of the representation of the people act, and this provision only taboos appeal for a vote on the ground of the candidate's religion or language, and if the appeal does not encroach on the prohibited .....

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , sagard. the heads of the following non-government membersorganisations:1. janadhwani vedike,field marshal kariappa road, somwarpet2. vrukshalaksha andolana seva trust, sagara3. nature conservation foundation, mysoree. the following eminent conservationists, membersecologists, and environmentalists:1. k.b. girish ganapati2. keregundi estate, devapura post,gonekoppa3. sanjay gubbi, tumkur4. girija ..... safeguards were taken by government of india in 1980 by constituting tiwari committee, which recommended for establishment of department of environment to act as a nodal agency for environment protection eco-development in the country, for comprehensive review and recommendations, not covered by the ..... appointing honorary wildlife wardens. the latest order appointing honorary wildlife wardens was issued on 22-02-2007 and 02-08-2007.wildlife act, section 21 - final notification -government of karnataka has issued final notifications for all the 5 national parks and 21 wildlife sanctuaries .....

M. Sankaranarayanan Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, ...

Court : Chennai

..... with identical averments, would contend that the writ petitions are not maintainable. according to the learned counsel, kalakshetra foundation is an autonomous body under the ministry of culture, government of india and it is governed by the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993. the recruitment to various posts in the foundation is governed by the recruitment rules. it is further stated that there is only one post of deputy ..... director exists in the foundation which is next to the post of director. it is an important administrative post. the .....

M/S Ncr Developers vs.university of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... for any reason that was not possible, there could not be any reference for arbitration at all. in essence what the condition says is that the foundation of the arbitration agreement itself is appointment by the executive director, in the manner contemplated. if this condition which is fundamental to the arbitration agreement itself ..... has relied upon the following judgments of this court as well as the supreme court: i. nandyal coop. spinning mills ltd. v. k.v. mohan rao (1993) 2 scc654ii. nav nirman construction company v. executive engineer cd-ix, irrigation and flood control department, gnctd2011scc online del 3948 iii. indian oil corporation ltd. v. ..... supplied) 16. pertinently, in ansal buildwell limited case (supra), this court in a petition filed by the aggrieved party under section 11(6) of the act noticed the arbitration clause containing a similar condition upheld the right of the respondent to appoint the arbitrator and declined to appoint an independent arbitrator holding as under .....

United States Vs. Wong Kim Ark

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and, in extreme cases, of ulterior measures. it provides a material sanction for rights; it does not offer a theoretic foundation. it does not act within a foreign territory with the consent of the sovereign; it acts against him contentiously from without." the privileges or immunities which, by the second clause of the amendment, the states are ..... , 1802, c. 28; march 26, 1804, c. 47; 2 stat. 153, 292; february 10, 1854, c. 71; 10 stat. 604; rev.stat. 2165, 2172, 1993. in the act of 1790, the provision as to foreign-born children of american citizens was as follows: "the children of citizens of the united states, that may be born beyond sea ..... , to adopt the citizenship of his birthplace? it seems not, and that he must change his allegiance by emigration and legal process of naturalization.' sections 1992 and 1993 of the revised statutes clearly show the extent of existing legislation; that the fact of birth, under circumstances implying alien subjection, establishes, of itself, no right of .....

Richard Ross Skinner Vs. Durga Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.66

..... as an absolute estate in these provinces, where estates tail are unknown. the qualified estate known as an estate tail had its origin in the ancient feudal system, the foundation of english, jurisprudence as regards landed property. that system finds no place in the territorial law of these provinces. in western india a land tenure is to be found ..... be referred for trial and determined. the issues. are (1) 'is the suit barred by time?' (2) 'is the plaintiff's suit join-maintainable on account of any act of the plaintiff, or his father or his guardian?' and (3) 'is the plaintiff bound to pay the amount alleged by the defendant durga prasad and what are the correct ..... heir. the learned counsel for durga prasad recognized this difficulty, the was obliged to call in aid of his argument the provisions of section s4 of the indian succession act of 1865, asking us to hold that words which in a devise of land in england would confer an estate tail would in this country pass the whole interest .....

Shib Sabitri Prasad and ors. Vs. the Collector of Meerut

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All82

..... not? if it was found at her death and in an unmutilated state, then she did not revoke it. if it was not so found then there is room and foundation for the revocation which the law will presume in the absence of testimony to rebut it. in most cases the solution of this question presents no difficulty, for the depositories ..... this was an enquiry upon which the court was not bound to enter; that the will thus made could only be revoked by the specific methods indicated in the wills act, and that unless the defendant established in revocation the court was bound to pronounce it unrevoked and admit it to probate. on the part of the defendant it was argued ..... his property, subject to an allowance of rs. 100 a month to any widow he should leave behind, in trust to the district judge, and, if he should decline to act, to the collector of the district. by paragraph 8 of the will he declared that 14 of the income of his estate should be spent in charity, namely, in the .....

Bhagwati Vs. Banwari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All82

..... holder property which the latter had purchased at a sale in execution of his own decree. in the judgment in that case their lordships say that there is no foundation in principle or authority for the distinction which it was attempted to set up between a person standing in the position of a claimant under an execution sale and ..... that the legislature intended that a purchaser at auction sale may obtain possession by means of a suit is 'manifest from article 138 of schedule ii of the limitation act, to which i have already referred. that article makes no distinction between the case of a decree-holder purchaser and that of any other purchaser. i can find ..... procedure make no distinction between a decree-holder auction-purchaser and any other auction-purchaser. i may also refer to article 138 of the second schedule to the limitation act, under which a suit may be brought by an auction-purchaser fir recovery of possession within twelve years from the date of the auction sale. in that article no .....

Mata Prasad and anr. Vs. Chandradeo Singh and

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All176

..... council, in nanomi babuasin v. modhun mohun the ruling in jamna v. nain sukh can no longer be considered as law.28. is there any solid foundation for the contention that their lordships of the privy council overruled in the cases which i have cited the clear and definite rule of the mitakshara? according to ..... affected by the transaction on the other part, be deemed to have existed if the transferee after using reasonable care to ascertain the existence of such circumstances has acted in good faith.' the learned chief justice then remarks: 'this statutory provision is substantially a statement of the principle deducible from the cases on this point. ..... the family property so as to pass even his son's interest therein, while section 38 (in error described as section 34) of the transfer of property act provides that' where any person authorized only under circumstances in their nature variable to dispose of immovable property, transfers such property for consideration, alleging the existence of .....