Juvenile Justice Care And Protection Of Children Amendment Act 2006 Section 19 - Judgment Search Results

Ex. Gnr. Ajit Singh, S/O Mahesh Chand Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3994; 2004(73)DRJ494

2000 are applicable on juvenile trial and sentence of such juvenile by general court marshal quashed criminal law amendment act 1952 has contended that after coming into force of the juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 the applicability of the 20 with these observations petition stands disposed of juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 2 k 2 by learned counsel for both the parties juvenile justice care protection of children act was passed by the parliament pursuant to counsel for both the parties juvenile justice care protection of children act was passed by the parliament pursuant to the resolution of such juvenile by general court marshal quashed criminal law amendment act 1952 section 7 constitution of india 1950 article 33 spite of any other law in force including the army act when the parliament in its wisdom has included offences which pursuant to section 29 which deals with child welfare committee section 37 deals with shelter homes and chapter iv under the the resolution adopted by the united nations on 20th november 1989 on the right of the child wherein a set of

Master Niku Chaubey Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT577; 2006(88)DRJ830

belongs to a religious family it also discloses that the juvenile s family appears to be genuine towards maintaining discipline at well as psychologically this application stands disposed of dusty juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000section 12 denial of care that his son is properly educated and is taken care of morally as well as psychologically this application stands disposed this application stands disposed of dusty juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000section 12 denial of bail on the stands disposed of dusty juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000section 12 denial of bail on the ground that of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the said act it is mandatory for the court to grant bail to revision petition is directed against the order dated 03 03 2006 passed by the additional sessions judge fast track court rohini that in the case of a juvenile in terms of section 12 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children juvenile notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1973 or any other law for the time being in force

Shambhu and anr. Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ731

..... would be entitled to the protection under juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 amended on 26 8 2006 as interpreted by the supreme ..... are disposed of in the above terms juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000conviction sections 302 307 of ipc trial court correctly ..... pw 18 mewati devi is another eye witness pw 19 head constable subhash chand is a formal witness pw .....

Sandeep Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3182; 119(2005)DLT398; 2005(81)DRJ755

of the juvenile are in the same locality 4 the juvenile was not very keen in his studies 5 the juvenile of sessions when approached in the revisional jurisdiction the juvenile justice board in its order dated 3 6 2004 observed that the trial court file be sent back immediately juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 12 denial of court file be sent back immediately juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 12 denial of bail allegation be sent back immediately juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 12 denial of bail allegation of offence 12 of the juvenile justice car and protection of children act 2000 enumerates three grounds when a bail to the juvenile alipur on 29 10 2003 for an alleged offence under section 376 201 34 of the indian penal code the fir

Court on Its Own Motion Re: State Vs. Pradeep

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT527; 2005(83)DRJ491

reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application moved to juvenile court on false grounds with the report of prosecution held for criminal reference 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile criminal reference 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application moved ahmed and h s bains v state u t chandigarh 1980crilj1308 3 as regards reference no 2 the power of the

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... section 4 juvenile justice board 1 notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1973 2 of 1974 the state government may 1 within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the juvenile justice care and protection of children amendment act 2006 ..... brought before him is a juvenile or a child 19 on the other hand section 7 of the jj act 2000 contains an entire scheme including .....

State Vs. Jagtar and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... considered the provisions of the juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 especially the provisions of sections 2 k 2 l 7a explanation and 49 as amended by the act death sentence ref no 5 ..... which is to refer the matter to the juvenile justice board 93 section 7 a of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2006 permits the claim of juvenility to be made by a person at .....

Ravinder Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... considered the provisions of the juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 especially the provisions of sections 2 k 2 l 7a explanation and 49 as amended by the act death sentence ref no 5 ..... which is to refer the matter to the juvenile justice board 93 section 7 a of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2006 permits the claim of juvenility to be made by a person at .....

Noor Jahan Alias Haseena and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... considered the provisions of the juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 especially the provisions of sections 2 k 2 l 7a explanation and 49 as amended by the act death sentence ref no 5 ..... which is to refer the matter to the juvenile justice board 93 section 7 a of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2006 permits the claim of juvenility to be made by a person at .....

Akhilesh Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

year 2011 a case was pending against him before the juvenile justice board and same was the position on w p during his childhood where he was tried by the juvenile justice board and subsequently acquitted we may add here that even regular court thereby denying him the benefit of juvenile justice care protection act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the j j be read with rule 99 of the juvenile justice care protection of children rules 2007 which reads as under the records be dealt with under the juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the act which declares thereby denying him the benefit of juvenile justice care protection act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the j j act section of conviction for any offence it is also noteworthy that section 21 of the act prohibits publication of the name of the date of birth of the petitioner is 5 3 1979 as revealed in the record of union the petitioner appellant