Juvenile Justice Care And Protection Of Children Amendment Act 2006 Section 19 - Judgment Search Results

Ex. Gnr. Ajit Singh, S/O Mahesh Chand Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3994; 2004(73)DRJ494

reading of the aforesaid provision it is manifestly clear that juvenile justice board has power to deal exclusively relating to juvenile have the applicability and will override the provision of juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 under the juvenile justice 20 with these observations petition stands disposed of juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 2 k 2 these observations petition stands disposed of juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 2 k 2 l 2 that the state shall direct its policy towards securing that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy try offences covered by s 6 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 11 the whole act is replete with the have power to deal exclusively with all proceedings under this act relating to juvenile in conflict with law 2 the powers a persons who has not completed eighteenth year of age section 2 l further defines juvenile in conflict with law as the resolution adopted by the united nations on 20th november 1989 on the right of the child wherein a set of

Master Niku Chaubey Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT577; 2006(88)DRJ830

to moral arid psychological danger report of probation officer indicating juvenile to be immature and ignorant by nature and personality nature a juvenile in terms of section 12 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to juvenile in terms of section 12 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as this application stands disposed of dusty juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000section 12 denial of bail on the stands disposed of dusty juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000section 12 denial of bail on the ground that 12 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the said act it is revision petition is directed against the order dated 03 03 2006 passed by the additional sessions judge fast track court rohini that in the case of a juvenile in terms of section 12 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children juvenile notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1973 or any other law for the time being in force

Seva Chakkara Samajam Rep. by Its Secretary Vs. the Chairman Child Wel ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2012(5)LW293; 2012(6)CTC625

order as to costs consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 section 34 3 as to costs consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed juvenile justice care protection of children act 2000 section 34 3 and also directed the revision petitioner society to provide proper care and facilities to the said child and the revision petitioner the child and the child in need of care and protection a child is a person who has not completed eighteenth 25 c empowers the committee to reach out to such children in need of care and protection who are not in the child in need of care and protection under the act 15 therefore the child welfare committee has to be constituted with committee which means a child welfare committee constituted under section 29 iv competent authority is defined in section 2 g considered as the child in need of care and protection 19 it is an admitted fact by the first respondent that

Shambhu and anr. Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ731

..... would be entitled to the protection under juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 amended on 26 8 2006 as interpreted by the supreme ..... are disposed of in the above terms juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000conviction sections 302 307 of ipc trial court correctly ..... pw 18 mewati devi is another eye witness pw 19 head constable subhash chand is a formal witness pw .....

Sandeep Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3182; 119(2005)DLT398; 2005(81)DRJ755

of the family is satisfactory 2 the mother of the juvenile is concerned about the future of the juvenile 3 the and sent her back in those wet clothes the juvenile justice board declined bail to him so did the learned court the trial court file be sent back immediately juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 12 denial of court file be sent back immediately juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 section 12 denial of bail allegation section 12 of the juvenile justice car and protection of children act 2000 enumerates three grounds when a bail to the 12 of the juvenile justice car and protection of children act 2000 enumerates three grounds when a bail to the juvenile alipur on 29 10 2003 for an alleged offence under section 376 201 34 of the indian penal code the fir

Court on Its Own Motion Re: State Vs. Pradeep

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT527; 2005(83)DRJ491

reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application moved to juvenile court on false grounds with the report of prosecution held for criminal reference 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile criminal reference 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court 1 2003 is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of is disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application disposed of accordingly juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 reference by juvenile court scope of jurisdiction application moved ahmed and h s bains v state u t chandigarh 1980crilj1308 3 as regards reference no 2 the power of the

Amit Kumar Thakur @ Amit Ranjan Thakur Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... days it has been submitted that the case of the petitioner may be considered under juvenile justice care and protection of children amended act 2006 and section 20 as per explanation above shall be applicable for determination his ..... below and from the report it appears that the trial is at the fag end 19 the court below is directed to conclude the trial without delay and if needed the .....

Union of India and ors. Vs. Ex-gnr Ajeet Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

plea of being a juvenile even though he was a juvenile at the time of commission of some of the offences have been imposed 20 so far as the failure of justice is concerned this court in darbara singh v state of respondent the high court held that under the juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as high court held that under the juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 hereinafter referred to as 039 the mohamed ibrahim kalifulla jj juvenile justice care amp protection of children act 2000 army act sections 164 2 52 a 39 offences and in view of the provisions of the jj act the joint trial of those offences that he had allegedly moreover non obstante clauses contained in various provisions thereof particularly sections 15 16 18 19 and 20 render unambiguously the legislative the respondent as per the service record is 20 4 1984 he attained 18 years of age on 20 4 2002

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... section 4 juvenile justice board 1 notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1973 2 of 1974 the state government may 1 within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the juvenile justice care and protection of children amendment act 2006 ..... brought before him is a juvenile or a child 19 on the other hand section 7 of the jj act 2000 contains an entire scheme including .....

Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... juvenile justice board constituted under the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 this is the plain requirement of section 20 of the juvenile justice care and protection of children act ..... criminal procedure code has since been amended and some of the important ..... high court on 11 7 2006 had the defence of juvenility been raised before the ..... wife who was 19 years old at the time of .....