Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 63 of about 661 results (0.133 seconds)

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Rajesh Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2014 (HC)

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... crl.m.a.no.3071/2010 97 therefore pota should prevail. as pointed out in the lic case as between id act and lic act, so far as nationalisation and insurance business are concerned the latter act is a special legislation but when it comes to particular problem of disputes between employer and employees, or investigation and ..... ltd. v. state industrial and investment corporation of india : [1993]. 1 scr340where there was inconsistency between two special laws, the finance corporation act, 1951 and the sick industries companies (special provisions) act, 1985. the latter contained section 32 which gave overriding effect to its provisions and was held to crl rev.no.443/2009 & crl. ..... . in the pronouncement reported at (2000) 4 scc427allahabad bank vs. canara bank, the supreme court was called upon to examine the question as to whether the companies act, 1956 is a general or special statute. on application of these principles, it was held in para 39 that for the purposes of recovery of debt to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2023 (SC)

Kaushal Kishor Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Govt. Of U.p. Home Secre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... supreme court of india & ors.90 the minority judgment of subba rao and shah, jj.eventually became law in rustom cavasjee cooper vs. union of india91(bank nationalisation case), where the 11 judge bench finally discarded the view expressed in a.k. gopalan and held that various 90(2014) 9 scc73791(1970) 1 scc248119 fundamental ..... both civil and otherwise, against the central bank of india limited, which was at that time a company incorporated under companies act. the grievance of the petitioner in that case was that the shares held by him in the company were sold by the bank in exercise of its right of lien for recovery of a debt. therefore ..... trade unions at all times. one employee whose services were terminated was not reemployed, as he refused to accept the special condition. therefore, he sued the company for damages and claimed a declaration that his dismissal was a violation of the constitutional rights. holding that the constitutional right of citizens to form associations and unions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1998 (TRI)

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

..... the breach flows from a bona fide belief that the offender is not liable to act in the manner prescribed by the statute. those in charge of the affairs of the company in failing to register the company as a dealer acted in the honest and genuine belief that the company was not a dealer. granting that they erred, no case for imposing penalty ..... to register as a dealer--section 9(1) read with section 25(1)(a) of the act. it was found that those in charge of the affairs of the company in failing to register the company as a dealer had acted in the honest and genuine belief that the company was not dealer. para 7 from that decision is extracted below:- 7. under the ..... act penalty may be imposed for failure to register as a dealer: section 9(1) read with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1989 (FN)

Granfinanciera, S.A. Vs. Nordberg

Court : US Supreme Court

..... artifice. it reflects, instead, congress' longstanding view that fraudulent conveyances and preferences on the eve of bankruptcy are common methods through which debtors and creditors act to undermine one of the central goals of the bankruptcy process: the fair distribution of assets among creditors. congress' conclusion that the proper functioning of ..... preference actions into what used to be the plenary jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts. it was this change which laid the groundwork for the post- northern pipeline act at issue here. second, and more importantly, the court acknowledges that, when congress adopted the 1984 amendments, it was motivated by the same "efficiency ..... funds that he alleged were due to him from a bankrupt estate; respondent, the trustee, resisted paying the claims based on 57g of the old bankruptcy act, which forbade payments to creditors holding "void or voidable" preferences. petitioner claimed, much as petitioners here do, that the question whether prior payments to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2013 (HC)

State (Gnct of Delhi) Vs. Sidhartha Vashisht

Court : Delhi

..... agreed that he had made calls on 05.05.1999 to number 0017184768403 and added that he was enquiring about the equipment needed for his furnace manufacturing company. he denied having made any telephone calls thereafter. he denied the rest of the statements altogether. pw-57 also denied the supplementary statement attributed to ..... on the nature of the risk to the security of the witness, the value of the evidence and the importance in the matter. the australian witness protection act, 1994 establishes the national witness protection program in which (amongst others) the commissioner of the australian federal police arranges or provides protection and other assistance for ..... and assets etc. [section 7]. the commissioner has the sole responsibility of deciding whether to include a witness in the program.110. the witness protection act, 1998 of south africa provides for the establishment of an office called the office for witness protection within the department of justice. the director of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2013 (SC)

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... rate of simple interest. with a change in economy and the policy of reserve bank of india the interest rate has been lowered. the nationalised banks are now granting interest at the rate of 9% on fixed deposits for one year. we, therefore, direct that the compensation amount fixed ..... 4. his wife and children preferred the claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act, 1988), claiming compensation of rs.30,00,000/-. the 2nd respondent (insurance company) contested the claim. they had not disputed the accident or the insurance coverage. on behalf ..... is as follows: table 26 : minimum support price for non-foodgrains according to crop year (fair average quality) | | | | | | | | | |(per | | | | | | | | | | |quintal| | | | | | | | | | |) | |year |sugarca|cotto|jute |groundn|soyabe|soyabea|sunflow|rapesee|safflow| | |ne |n | |ut |en |n |er |d |er | | | | | |(in |black |yellow |seed |mustard| | | | | | |shell) | | | | | | |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

..... rule 1 would only be a mere irregularity and not an absence of jurisdiction.54. similarly, while dealing with a suit instituted by a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, a division bench of the bombay high court held in all india reporter limited vs ramchandra [air1961bombay292 that the provisions contained in order ..... the first defendant has filed a written statement contending inter alia - (a) that it is a public sector enterprise registered as a government company under section 617 of the companies act, 1956, under the administrative control of the department of defence production, ministry of defence, for the manufacture of special metals and super alloys ..... order 6, rule 14, need not be restricted to mean authorized by proper written authority or by power of attorney. there is authority for this view in bengal jute mills v. jewraj heeralal, air1943cal.13, air1948mad 369, ilr1939nag 515 : [air1939nag. 242]. and air1941nag 159. in these cases it was held that a plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2018 (HC)

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance or, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any ..... under:-" 5. there is no justification to prosecute or summon the... petitioner namely mr. shiv kumar jatia based on his purported status in the company (accused no.1) in the absence of any act or role in the commission of the alleged offences.6. the penal code does not contain any provision for attaching vicarious liability to a person ..... upon the same since: (a) the ansals were found to be guilty in the said case not by virtue of their position in the company but rather by virtue of 8 specific instances of acts overtly committed by them which were thoroughly negligent (para 90 and 91 - ansals judgment). in the present case it is not even the prosecutions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2011 (HC)

Sri M. Narayan Reddy Vs. the Govt. of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... also initiate a "maha yuddam' (a massive war) if centre does not announce a separate telangana. gaddar's tpf (telangana praja front) who had parted company with trs have again joined hands with trs. inputs indicate that this agitation can be tackled if congress leaders do not give an impression indicating any covert / ..... 40. for example, the appointment of justice vivian bose commission in 1956, to inquire into the affairs of allen berry and company, justice chagla commission appointed in 1966 to inquire into mundra group of companies, justice tendolkar's commission to investigate the affairs of the dalmia group, to mention a few, and the working thereof, ..... virtually defined the scope and ambit of the act and functioning of the commissions. they have also evoked and instilled the public confidence in the system. the 1952 act has been pressed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //