Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 49 of about 661 results (4.258 seconds)

Kailash Moudgil Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)72ITD97(Delhi)

..... decision itself is administrative, dictated by policy and expediency. but the procedure is subject to the principles of natural justice, which require the minister to act fairly towards the objector and not (for example) to take fresh evidence without disclosing it to them. a quasi-judicial decision is therefore an administrative ..... ' necessarily involves discretionary power, which ordinarily is complete unless limited in some way. it generally implies knowledge and the exercise of discretion after knowledge, the act of passing judgment or the exercise of judgment, the use of discretion and the determination as a deduction therefrom, in some cases "approval" implies the ..... that giving approval does not involve judicial proceeding. when there is no judicial proceeding and when we have already held that it is an administrative act, there is no question of violation of principles of natural justice in not intimating the assessee before granting approval by the commissioner. the next contention .....

Aarshiya Gulati (Minor) Thr. Next Friend & Ors vs.kuldeep Singh Gulati ...

Court : Delhi

..... in shareholding, restriction on transfer of shareholding, conversion of prior partnership, bank accounts being operated by all, agreement for equal participation in management or an understanding that a company would be managed on partnership principles [see: sangramsinh p.gaekwad & ors. vs. shantadevi p.gaekwad (dead) through lrs & ors., (2005) 11 scc314and ebrahimi vs ..... family property. (emphasis supplied) 57. consequently, a bare perusal of the above commentaries clearly shows that a grant under displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 is the self-acquired property of the donee. in the present plaint, there is no mention of any identifiable property ever owned or business ..... to the said memorandum of settlement was beyond limitation and in support of his submission, he relied upon section 7, explanation ii of the limitation act, 1963, which reads as under:-" 7. disability of one of several persons. where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or .....

m.siddiq (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Mahant Suresh Das

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 29 was respectfully declined to be answered by the constitution bench. the challenge in the writ petitions under article 32 and transferred cases was to the act, 1993. the act, 1993 was enacted to provide for the acquisition of certain area at ayodhya and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 2(a) defines ..... of an alternate dispute resolution mechanism to which they are entitled in the constitutional scheme.31. the constitution bench held that acquisition of the properties under the act affects the rights of both the communities and not merely those of the muslim community. in paragraph 49 following has been noticed: 49. the narration ..... to the provisions of statute of limitation thereby extinguishing the right of muslims to offer prayers in a particular mosque lost by adverse possession over that property. act comprehends 81. section 3(26) of the general the clauses to categories of properties known indian law. article 367 of the constitution adopts secular concept .....

Renusagar Power Company Vs. General Electric Company

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR561; (1990)92BOMLR70

..... unwarranted resort to clause 15 of the letters patent would defeat the purpose of the act.31. our attention was drawn to a judgment of the division bench of the calcutta high court in the case of shiva jute baling ltd. v. hindley and company ltd., reported in i.l.r. (1955) cal. 29. in that case ..... commerce as enforceable under the foreign awards (recognition and enforcement) act, 1961. he has accordingly passed a decree under section 6 of the act. the appellants have challenged his findings and decree.relevant facts.2. the appellant---renusagar power company ltd. is a company registered under the indian companies act, 1956. its registered office is at renukoot, district mirzapur ..... , in a dispute between the sellers in india and buyers in england, an arbitration award was obtained in london. the buyers applied to the calcutta high court under section 5 of the arbitration (protocol and convention) act, .....

Citibank N.A. Vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi487; [1984]56CompCas509(Delhi)

..... purchaser upon realizing sale proceeds but retain the said amount until further orders of the court. the amount so realised was directed to be deposited in a nationalised bank or scheduled bank or scheduled bank to earn interest. the sale of land and building was stayed in the meantime. 8. having thus failed to ..... : 'gentlemen : 92. in consideration of your making advances at our request or otherwise giving creditor or financial accommodation to j. k. ., an existing company within the meaning of the indian companies act, 1913, having its registered office at kamla tower, kanpur, u.p. (hereinafter called 'the principals'), in terms of or manner recorded in the loan ..... the court of the second civil judge, kanpur, for the recovery of the loan amount against the principal debtor, i.e., the ., without impleading the defendant-jute mills as a party therein and, further, by entering into a compromise with the ., without the concurrence of the present defendant and obtaining the consent decree dated .....

United Commercial Bank Vs. Madan Mohan Dide

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR317; [2002]109CompCas873(Bom)

..... of goods and the price realised at the sale. the documents executed, according to him, would show the value of the goods. the provisions of the companies act are very clear. once the official liquidator is appointed it is the official liquidator who comes into custody of the securities. in the present case, securities were ..... , handed over the keys to the official liquidator who took possession of securities. the sale was conducted by the official liquidator which was confirmed by the company court. even though the plaintiff-bank was a secured creditor and had informed the official liquidator that they would be standing outside the winding up proceeding they ..... principal debtor. useful reliance for that purpose may be placed on the judgment of the delhi high court in the case of citibank (n. a.) v. juggilal kamlapat jute mills co. ltd., : air1982delhi487 , wherein the delhi high court has reproduced and relied on the following observation from chitty on contracts, 24th edition volume ii, page .....

Kenya Airways, a Company Registered Under Law Regulating Companies in ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1998Bom287; 1998(3)ALLMR282; 1998(3)BomCR562; [1999]96CompCas140(Bom); 1998(2)MhLj668

..... enforcementof fundamental rights granted to citizens under the said article, and (ii) whether the state trading corporation is, notwithstanding the formality of incorporation under the indian companies act, 1956 in substance a department and organ of the government of india with the entirety of its capital contributed by government and can it claim to enforce ..... a decision of the supreme court in the case of veb dautrfraght seereederei restock (d.s.p. lines) a department of the german democratic republic v. new central jute mills co. ltd. and another, : air1994sc516 where it has been observed, as under :- '5. one of the principles of international law is that every ..... on 11th august, 1995 areference is made to the case of ('veb dautrfraght seereederei restock (d.s.p. lines)department of the german democratic republic, new central jute mills co. ltd. andanother'), reported in : air1994sc516 wherein it has been observed, as under:- 'in the present case, the appellant having been held to be .....

National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Office ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1989]75STC185(AP)

..... 27th april, 1980 and which was replaced by act no. 42 of 1980, the said national company limited was nationalised and the undertakings of the company stood transferred to and first vested with the central government by virtue of section 3 of the act. acting under section 5 of the above act, the central government issued a notification dated 28th ..... vested with effect from 28th april, 1980 in the jute corporation of india limited. under section 6 of the above act, the right, title and interest of the company in addition to its undertakings which had earlier been vested in the existing company were vested in a new government company, which is the present petitioner) with effect from ..... be called a transferee within the meaning of section 17. two judgments - one, of the calcutta high court in national jute . v. commercial tax officer (1982) 1 clj 31 and the other reported in burn standard company ltd. v. state of tamil nadu [1983] 52 stc 62 (mad.) support the contention of the learned counsel .....

Kamleshkumar Rajanikant Mehta Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Governmen ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1979(39)FLR329]; (1980)ILLJ336Bom; 1979MhLJ874

..... and omission on the part of the workman but the concept that the termination of the surplus workers' service is due to reasons such as economy, nationalisation in industry, installation or improvement of new labour-saving machinery or device, standardisation or improvement of plant or technique and the like. it is in ..... however, came to the conclusion that the termination of the petitioner's service amounted to retrenchment attracting the provisions of s. 25f of the industrial disputes act, and that the bank not having complied with the mandatory provisions of that section, the order of termination could not be sustained. the tribunal concluded by ..... by the bank to that letter. 6. being aggrieved by the termination order, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute under s. 2a of the industrial disputes act before the conciliation authority. nothing came of the same, except a failure report. two references were summarily rejected by the tribunal for technical reasons on preliminary .....

Jolly Elevators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.M. Yagnik and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2001Bom68; 2000(4)ALLMR289; 2001(1)BomCR205; (2000)3BOMLR671; 2000(4)MhLj366

..... 12 of the letters patent. before going to those findings, it is necessary to refer the brief facts involved in that case, the plaintiffs are joint stock company which is having its registered office at bombay. the defendants were appointed secretaries and managing agents of the respondent. it is alleged in the plaint that on ..... with the contract. and as the defendants reside, and carry on business in bombay and are thus amenable to the jurisdiction of the high court, that court can act in personam and compel the defendants to fulfill their fiduciary obligation though such fulfillment has reference to lands situate outside the jurisdiction.' 8. shri mahajan, j. held thus ..... majority judgment. the principal question that arose in that case is what is the meaning of 'suits for land' occurring in clause 12 of the letters patent act. each one of the hon'ble judges have given their own reasons for their conclusion. the learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon the observation made by .....