Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 6 of about 104 results (0.162 seconds)

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Sarwan Kumar Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Joginder Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Sawan Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Darshan Dayal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Krishan Lal Narang Thr. Its Parokar Deepali Naran Vs. Central Bureau ...

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Usha Rani Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Dilbag Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Prem Bahl Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Kailash Kaushik Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... delhi towers ltd. v. g.n.c.t of delhi, an issue arose as to whether an approved scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the company s act, 1956 would be exigible to stamp duty. the petitioner had placed reliance on two notifications: the first notification bearing no.1 dated 16 th january, 1937 and the ..... is a manifest error in the exercise of such power or the exercise of the power is manifestly arbitrary. [reference: (2003) 4 scc579(para 13), indian railway construction company limited v. ajay kumar and; (1988) 4 scc59 state of up v. renu sagar power co.].392. we usefully notice the principles on which unreasonableness would be construed ..... by appropriate measures, transfer a part of its judicial functions or powers to the tribunals or other such bodies. this view is expressed by this court, in associated cements companies ltd. v. p.n. sharma : air1965sc1595 xxx xxx xxx 137. article 21 of the constitution of india takes in its sweep the right to expeditious and fair trial. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //