Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 1 of about 104 results (0.075 seconds)

Mar 29 2019 (HC)

C S Aggarwal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... the ground that this court does not have pecuniary jurisdiction to hear cases with valuation of less than rs.2 crores. under section 300 of the succession act, the high court and district court have concurrent jurisdiction in probate matters. however, despite clear position of law, counsel for the objector raised this objection in ..... verma, (1995) 1 scc421 the supreme court observed that to enable the courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, pre-variation and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any court to administer justice in ..... by her son, dr. gagan singla and hansraj as the attesting witnesses. she further deposed that she filed an application under section 372 of the indian succession act before the learned civil judge (senior divison), kaithal, haryana for grant of succession certificate on the basis of the will dated 07th december, 1994 for which the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2019 (HC)

Aarshiya Gulati (Minor) Thr. Next Friend & Ors vs.kuldeep Singh Gulati ...

Court : Delhi

..... in shareholding, restriction on transfer of shareholding, conversion of prior partnership, bank accounts being operated by all, agreement for equal participation in management or an understanding that a company would be managed on partnership principles [see: sangramsinh p.gaekwad & ors. vs. shantadevi p.gaekwad (dead) through lrs & ors., (2005) 11 scc314and ebrahimi vs ..... family property. (emphasis supplied) 57. consequently, a bare perusal of the above commentaries clearly shows that a grant under displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 is the self-acquired property of the donee. in the present plaint, there is no mention of any identifiable property ever owned or business ..... to the said memorandum of settlement was beyond limitation and in support of his submission, he relied upon section 7, explanation ii of the limitation act, 1963, which reads as under:-" 7. disability of one of several persons. where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2018 (HC)

Asian Hotels (West) Ltd. & Ors. Vs.jindal Photo Investment Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... parties referred to under serial numbers 1 to 4 above shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the gupta group; 5. asian holdings private limited, a private company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 ("act") and having its registered office at c/o asian hotels limited, bhikaji cama place, m.g. marg, new delhi-110 607 ("asian holdings"); 6. mr ..... hotels (west) ltd.38. this court is also of the opinion that the relief sought by the plaintiffs is barred by the statute, especially section 111a of the companies act, 1956, which clearly prohibits any restriction on sale and purchase of the shares listed on a stock exchange. on the sole allegation in the plaint that miss anita ..... his 300 votes outnumbered the 200 of the two other shareholders. it was held that the article in question was not invalidated by s. 184 of the companies act 1948 which empowered a company by ordinary resolution to remove a director. russell l.j.said, ([1969]. i all er 1002 at 1006, [1969]. 2 ch 438 at. 447- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2018 (HC)

Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...

Court : Delhi

..... page 10 of 218 w.p.(c)no.5217/17. the petitioner nos.2 to 8 in this writ petition are either companies incorporated under the provisions of the companies act or societies under the society registration act, all of whom claim that they are either running hospitals or providing medical facilities.6. all other connected writ petitions lay a ..... metro rail corporation (dmrc) had disputed liability to pay property tax in view of section 184 of the railways act. this judgment notes that the delhi metro rail corporation limited is a company registered under section 617 of the companies act, 1956 and that the central government and the government of nct of delhi having 50% holding each.285. on ..... all possible for the wp(c) 5217/2017 & connected matters page 150 of 218 company to carry on its business on payment of such wages. however, the company was unable to open the mills by reason of the fact that the minimum wages act makes it a criminal offence not to pay the wages fixed thereunder. both the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2018 (HC)

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance or, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any ..... under:-" 5. there is no justification to prosecute or summon the... petitioner namely mr. shiv kumar jatia based on his purported status in the company (accused no.1) in the absence of any act or role in the commission of the alleged offences.6. the penal code does not contain any provision for attaching vicarious liability to a person ..... upon the same since: (a) the ansals were found to be guilty in the said case not by virtue of their position in the company but rather by virtue of 8 specific instances of acts overtly committed by them which were thoroughly negligent (para 90 and 91 - ansals judgment). in the present case it is not even the prosecutions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Kailash Gahlot & Ors. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Rajesh Rishi & Anr. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Alka Lamba vs.union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Naresh Yadav vs.union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Shri Adarsh Shastri and Ors. Vs.election Commission of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... government . referring to the decision in the case of guru gobinda basu (supra) which was a case of a chartered accountant who was auditor of government companies and director with state government financial corporation, it was held that disqualification had indeed occurred.106. it was vehemently submitted that there was a difference between the ..... is obvious that the discretion is given to the election commission on the matter of procedure when it is required to give its opinion. the gnctd act and 1951 act did not deem it appropriate to prescribe a procedure. no statutory limitations and restrictions are postulated. this is appropriately left to the sagacity and wisdom ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //