Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 66 of about 665 results (0.278 seconds)

Denver and R. G. W. R. Co. Vs. Trainmen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... having concluded that the unincorporated association should be viewed as an entity for purposes of residence under 1391(b), that residence must still be ascertained, an inquiry requiring examination of congressional intent and the interests reflected in coronado and in principles underlying venue limitations. in sperry prods., inc. v. association of american ..... must have approved of assimilating for venue purposes the treatment of unincorporated associations to that of corporations, because such a process of assimilation had been advocated by judge learned hand in sperry prods., inc. v. association of american railroads, 132 f.2d 408, cert. denied, 319 u.s. 744. the narrow ..... must be brought "in the district of which the defendant is an inhabitant, or in any district in which the defendant . . . shall have committed acts of infringement and have a regular and established place of business." [ footnote 2/5 ] none of the parties here have suggested that an unincorporated association's .....

Sukhdeo and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All151; 1968CriLJ438

..... is culpable homicide not amounting to murder. the penal code, therefore, does not contain any definition of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.32. the words 'likely by such act to cause death' occurring in section 299 i.p.c. can only mean that the injuries caused be such that either of the following probabilities may exists, that is to ..... it has therefore, to be seen whether the injuries were caused in the circumstances that it could be said that the appellants had knowledge that they were likely by such act to cause death. baijnath alias baiju was quite unarmed at the time he was attacked. he was mercilessly beaten with lathis by as many as six persons and as ..... s.d. khare, j.1. this is an appeal directed against an order dated 2nd july, 1964, passed by the learned additional sessions judge, varanasi convicting all the five appellants for offences of rioting, culpable homicide not amounting to murder and causing simple hurt and sentencing each of theappellants to imprisonment for life .....

W.E.B. Dubois Clubs of America Vs. Clark

Court : US Supreme Court

..... again to be part and parcel of those first amendment rights. basic in this scheme of values is the immunity of beliefs, ideas, and ideology from government inquiry, probing, or surveillance. [ footnote 2/1 ] jefferson expressed the american constitutional theory: "[t]he opinions of men are not the object of civil government ..... u.s.c. 786. prior to hearing thereon, appellants sued in the district court to have the registration provisions declared unconstitutional. a three-judge district court dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. held: ordinarily where congress has provided a civil proceeding in which appellants can ..... bypass the board by suing in the district court. [ footnote 2 ] appellants' complaint in the district court alleged that the communist-front registration provisions of the act were unconstitutional. [ footnote 3 ] the complaint also alleged that the "very pendency of these administrative proceedings . . . has resulted and will continue to result .....

Klopfer Vs. North Carolina

Court : US Supreme Court

..... with admirable promptness during the march, 1964, special criminal session of the superior court of orange county; but, when the jury failed to reach a verdict, the trial judge declared a mistrial and ordered the case continued for the term. several weeks prior to the april, 1965, criminal session of the superior court, the state's solicitor ..... during the session, petitioner, through his attorney, opposed the entry of such an order in open court. the trespass charge, he contended, was abated by the civil rights act of 1964 as construed in hamm v. city of rock hill, 379 u. s. 306 (1964). in spite of petitioner's opposition, the court indicated that it would ..... subject to prosecution at any time in the future at the discretion of the prosecutor. although petitioner objected that the trespass charge was abated by the civil rights act of 1964 and that entry of the nolle prosequi order would violate his federal right to a speedy trial, the trial court, without stated justification, granted the .....

Katz Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the telephone booth from which the petitioner placed his calls. it is true that the absence of such penetration was at one time thought to foreclose further fourth amendment inquiry, olmstead v. united states, 277 u. s. 438 , 277 u. s. 457 , 277 u. s. 464 , 277 u. s. 466 ; goldman v. united states ..... judicial processes," united states v. jeffers, 342 u. s. 48 , 342 u. s. 51 , and that searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the fourth amendment [ footnote 18 ] -- subject only to a few specifically established and well delineated exceptions. [ footnote 19 ] it ..... , is whether the search and seizure conducted in this case complied with constitutional standards. in that regard, the government's position is that its agents acted in an entirely defensible manner: they did not begin their electronic surveillance until investigation of the petitioner's activities had established a strong probability that he was .....

United States Vs. Correll

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or family expenses." 262 of the internal revenue code of 1954, 26 u.s.c. 262. [ footnote 4 ] after denying the government's motion for a directed verdict, the district judge charged the jury that it would have to "determine under all the facts of this case whether or not" the commissioner's rule was "an arbitrary regulation as applied to ..... respect not here relevant by the revenue act of 1962, 4(b), 76 stat. 976. [ footnote 7 ] because 262 makes "personal, living, or family expenses" nondeductible, see n 3, supra, the taxpayer whose business requires no travel ..... treasury department, in hearings on h.r. 8245 before the senate committee on finance, 67th cong., 1st sess., at 50, 234-235 (1921). accordingly 214(a)(1) of the revenue act of 1921, c. 136, 42 stat. 239, for the first time included that language that later became 162(a)(2). see n 2, supra. the section was amended in a .....

Will Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... prepare your defense because i am afraid you or somebody helping you will lie and we won't be able to do anything about it." upon further inquiry, the united states attorney made no suggestion that there was a particular danger that disclosure of the names sought by request number 25 would result in subornation ..... abstract pronouncement on the question whether this fact imposes a more stringent standard for the invocation of mandamus by the government where the allegation is that a district judge has deviated from the federal rules. [ footnote 11 ] petitioner at one point stated to government counsel: "i told you that any time you made a ..... i have never required them to disclose their evidence, but i have required them to identify the people with whom the defendant is supposed to have participated in an illegal act but who were present." we note merely that petitioner was careful to distinguish his practice from requiring the government to produce its evidence or a list of witnesses. in any .....

Commissioner Vs. Stidger

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 40 t.c. 896), and respondent petitioned for review in the court of appeals for the ninth circuit. that court, in a per curiam decision with one judge dissenting, reversed the tax court and rejected the commissioner's definition of "home" for purposes of the deduction. 355 f.2d 294. the majority of the court ..... compensation, issued its report and recommendations. advisory commission on service pay, career compensation for the uniformed forces (1948). that report formed a principal basis for the career compensation act of 1949, c. 681, 3 stat. 802. on the subjects of subsistence and quarters allowances, the commission stated (appendix, p. 17): "the theory behind the ..... related above, respondent's "home" in 1958 was his permanent duty station at iwakuni, japan, or, instead, the residence of his family in california. from the revenue act of 1921 [ footnote 4 ] down to 162(a)(2) of the 1954 internal revenue code, congress has provided a deduction from taxable income for travel expenses, including .....

Chapman Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a california state criminal trial during which the prosecutor, as then permitted by a state constitutional provision, extensively commented on their failure to testify. the trial judge also charged the jury that it could draw adverse inferences from such failure. after the trial, but before petitioners' appeal was considered, the state constitutional ..... ] for myself, i intimate no view on congressional power with respect to state courts in this regard. [ footnote 3/2 ] cases in which lower federal courts, acting under the authority of the fourteenth amendment, as expanded by this court's decision in reynolds v. sims, 377 u. s. 533 , have promulgated their own reapportionment ..... done today, that a special harmless error rule is a necessary remedy for a particular kind of error revives the unfortunate idea that appellate courts must act on particular errors, rather than decide on reversal by an evaluation of the entire proceeding to determine whether the cause as a whole has been determined .....

Keyishian Vs. Board of Regents

Court : US Supreme Court

..... recommend appointment. an appointment or recommendation for appointment shall constitute a certification by the appointing or page 385 u. s. 620 recommending officer that due inquiry has been made and that he finds no reason to believe that the candidate is disqualified for the appointment. further resolved that this resolution shall become ..... to appellants in holding them constitutional. it is significant that appellees consistently defended the constitutionality of these sections in the courts below. moreover, the three-judge court rendered its decision upon the basis of a "stipulation of fact," paragraph 20 of which recites: "section 3022 incorporates in full by reference and ..... state, shall be removed from such position for the utterance of any treasonable or seditious word or words or the doing of any treasonable or seditious act or acts while holding such position. 3022. elimination of subversive persons from the public school system 1. the board of regents shall adopt, promulgate, and .....