Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 57 of about 665 results (0.256 seconds)

P.V. Munavalli Vs. State of Mysore by Its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Sou ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1967Kant249; AIR1967Mys249; (1967)2MysLJ484

..... the reason given by the high court for his supersession by munsiffs junior to him and deferring consideration of his case after the special report from the district judge was received a year later. the circumstances under which the high court excluded the respondent's name from the names in the panel of munsiffs suitable for ..... who was in the cadre munsiffs on the west bengal judicial service, challenged the order of the calcutta high court, promoting his juniors to the cadre of subordinate judges.from the facts of the said case, it appears, that on or about the 16th december 1954, thecases of several munsiffs came up for consideration before the high ..... reason for withholding promotion of the petitioner for one year was according to the impugned govt. order, that his confidential report for 1961 was damaging and that for 1968 it was unsatisfactory. in the counter affidavit filed by the under secretary to government,the action of the government it sought to be justified on the very same .....

Yunus Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1969CriLJ73

..... 18 other persons while the proceeding which was started against yunus was against yunus and five other persons. daring the course of those proceedings on the 29th march 1968, an application was moved on behalf of najeebullah to add 16 parsons more in the party of yunus and to proceed against those additional persona also under sections ..... by the learned additional district magistrate.the report of the circle inspector, the substance of which has already been reproduced by me undoubtedly failed to specify any overt act on the part of sixteen persona in question. it is rather vague. the opinion of the circle officer that the number of persons in the patty of yunus ..... of the code of criminal procedure and the notice issued to the opposite party appears to have force. section 112, criminal p.c. enjoins that when a magistrate acting under section 107, section 108, section 109 or section 110 deems it necessary to require any person to show cause under such section, he shall make an order .....

E. Pedda Subba Reddy and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP281; 1969CriLJ1025

..... , c. j., and macklin, j., in j. d. boyawalla v. sorab rustomji air 1941 bom 294 held that ' that the magistrate could act upon the report of a police officer without further inquiry and that the order of the magistrate was a judicial order, and that therefore the alleged false charge was made in or in relation to a ..... up in revision to the high court.3. mr. padmanabha reddy appearing for the petitioners has argued that the sessions judge was in error in setting aside the order of the magistrate and directing further enquiry and had failed to appreciate the correct position that the courts has no jurisdiction to ..... he dismissed the complaint under section 203 cr. p. c. the second respondent went up in revision under section 435 and 436, cr. p. c. and the sessions judge, cuddappah reversed the order of the magistrate and directed him 'to make further enquiry into the complaints of the petitioner'. it us against that order, the petitioner have come .....

CochIn Dock Labour Union (by Its Secretary) and ors. Vs. CochIn Dock L ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ108Ker

..... work, and more than 500 workmen scheduled for work on subsequent days also abstained for work. it is the petitioners' case that pursuant to a letter dated 7 december 1968 (copy ex p. 2) from the chief labour commissioner (central), ministry of labour, to the general secretary, port, dock and water front, workers' federation of ..... governed by the provisions of the cochin dock works (regulation of employment) scheme, 1959, framed under the provisions of the dock workers (regulation of employment) act, 1948 (central act 9 of 1918). by an award in industrial dispute no. 3 of 1961, dated 18 october 1962, about 1,800 dock workers wore registered, according to ..... name has been removed in accordance with provisions of the scheme. clause 45 (2) provides for disciplinary proceedings against the registered dock workers who commit any act of indiscipline or misconduct. clause 47 provides that employment of a registered worker shall not be terminated except in accordance with the provisions of the scheme, .....

State of Orissa Vs. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1269; [1967(15)FLR209]; (1967)IILLJ266SC; 1967MhLJ993(SC); [1967]2SCR625

..... accountant general that the first respondent had mis-stated her age when she was admitted to service of the state. after an inquiry the first respondent was required to show cause why her date of birth should not be accepted as april 4, 1907. ..... basic rules of justice and fair play. the deciding authority, it is true, is not in the position of a judge called upon to decide an action between contesting parties, and strict compliance with the forms of judicial procedure may not be insisted ..... order passed on june 27, 1963, and declaring the respondent to be entitled to continue in service till april 10, 1968. the first respondent claimed that the order made by the state amounted to an order of compulsory retirement contrary to the ..... about the regularity of the enquiry and the high court was apparently of the view that the question whether the state acted arbitrarily did not raise any question of investigation into complicated issues of fact. no interference with the exercise of the discretion .....

Municipal Board Vs. Angan, Accused

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1970CriLJ123

..... . apan could not, as such exercise any of the functions of a food inspector.6. the milk for the purpose of being tested under the act was purchased by sri i.p. apan on 24th september, 1968, on which date he was not a validly appointed food inspector and the sample could not as such be taken by him under section 11 ..... if the state government was satisfied that he continued to possess adequate knowledge and competence as food inspector. the-appointment of sri i.p. apan was made on 80th march 1968, while the prevention of food adulteration sot, 1954 came into force on 1st june 1955. the appointment was, therefore, after the expiry of the period of four years and since ..... of the sot. section 12 of the act, however, empowers even a private citizen to purchase milk for being sent to the public analyst. that section reads .....

State of U.P. Vs. Ram Sanehi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1969CriLJ952

..... to them. accordingly he recorded an acquittal of the respondents.9. learned counsel for the state has not challenged the findings of facts arrived at by the learned trial judge. it is, however, urged that simply because sri rastogi failed to observe the provisions of section 165, criminal p.c., inasmuch as he did not record in writing ..... ohaukidar.4. sri rastogi and the two constables, who had received injuries in the occurrence, were medically examined by dr. jitendra verm (p. w. 9) on 18-10-1968 at the district hospital, banda, between 9 and 9.50 p.m, who found six contusions, two contused wounds and three abrasions on sri rastogi, four contusions on constable krishna ..... his office within the meaning of first part of section 99 of the indian penal code. it was observed further that it was difficult to hold that he was acting in good faith and, therefore, the second part of section 99 was also not attracted to the case. accordingly the conviction and sentences of the appellants under sections .....

Joginder Singh Inder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1968CriLJ858

..... fine of two hundred rupees vide his order dated the 27th april, 1966. the petitioner filed an appeal against that order which was dismissed by shri raghu singh, additional sessions judge, amritsar dated the 12th august, 1966. the petitioner still was not satisfied and has approached this court in revision.3. mr. giani, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the ..... of the above facts, the case against the petitioner was registered and after the investigation he was sent up for trial under section 61(1)(c) of the punjab excise act, 1914. the trial was held by shri k.c. maini, magistrate first glass, who found the charge proved against the petitioner, convicted him accordingly and sentenced him to sis months .....

Bhagwanti and ors. Vs. Attar Singh

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT553

..... sur)'it singh s/o smt. bhagwanti, my landlady and they stayed at star htoel, qutab road, delhi on 28th november 1965 in room no. 38. on inquiry, ample evidence will be available; to prove that the case against me is false and has been instituted at the instance of smt. bhagwanti and her sons shri prabh ..... disappointment with the manner in which the proceedings in the court below have been conducted. without saying anything more, i unhesitatingly accept the recommendations of the learned additional sessions judge and quash the proceedings under section 211, indian penal code, against smt. bhagwanti,shriprabhsingh and shri surjit singh (6) i should also like to draw the attention ..... do nto make one right, and, for a court of law and justice, to seek to punish some one, who may be considered to have committed an illegal act, by itself illegally assuming jurisdiction, is something which is unthinkable and can by no means be countenanced by this court. such a course of action defeats the very .....

Leitanthem Bidhu Singh and ors. Vs. Khangjrakpam Ibobi Singh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... an affidavit may be sworn.7. then there is the decision of the rajasthan high court in air 1966 raj 5, relied on by the additional sessions judge, who made some of the references in question. bhargava, j., held that the affidavits for proceedings under section 145, criminal procedure code cannot be sworn before a ..... and passed orders under section 145(4) cr.p.c. the aggrieved parties assailed the orders in revision before the sessions court, manipur. the additional sessions judge relied upon the decision reported in hemdan v. state of rajasthan air 1966 raj 5 and held that the affidavits, which were sworn before some other magistrates ..... filed thereunder, should be sworn. but, section 510(510a?) criminal procedure code, which was inserted by the same amendment act (act xxvi of 1955), is the general section, which applies to all such formal affidavits filed in any inquiry or trial or other proceeding under the criminal procedure code. so, no special provision was made in section 145(1) .....