Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 56 of about 665 results (0.251 seconds)

Budhiram Khatua Vs. Anima Bose and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1968Ori165; 33(1967)CLT1001; 1968CriLJ1188

..... information that a purse containing rs. 26/- had been stolen from her residential quarters in the previous nightthe sub-inspector of police deputed opp. party-2 for inquiry after some conversation with the headmistress, the house of the complainant was searched. thereafter at the instigation of the headmistress the a s i. assaulted him with ..... revision has been filed.2. the orders passed by the learned courts below are fairly well discussed on facts. the learned sessions judge referred to ex a a complaint in writing filed by the petitioner before the president. fourth grade government servants association wherein there was no reference to the complainant ..... the accused persons to the court of session and discharged the accused under section 209, cr. p. c. the petitioner filed a revision before the learned sessions judge who dismissed the same observing that the complainant had failed to make out a prima facie case under section 330. i. p. c. against this order the .....

Mohan and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1302

..... the accused had given some counter version of the incident and on that account he had not shown their arrest till 12 at noon on 12th january, 1967. the trial judge accepted the prosecution version and declined to give any weight to the accused-appellants' plea that bachan singh, along with his brother and other bad characters came to their tube ..... of criminal procedure some four years' back. the parties came to terms and with it the proceedings ended. about 4 days before the occurrence a case under the punjab excise act was registered against bachan singh p.w. by the police. he thought that mohan lal accused-appellant and his brother ishar singh were responsible for it, in order to collect .....

K. P. Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1968]68ITR638(AP)

..... , hence, no penalty can be levied under section 28(1) (c). the bench appears to have overlooked this argument, and after the retirement of one of the judges, a review petition was filed which came up before srinivasan j. who held that there were good grounds for allowing the review. it was held that in order to ..... to have been accepted, because if accepted it would have avoided tax. if the acceptance of the revised return does not impose a liability on the assessee for the acts of default committed by him already, it would be tantamount to saying that the legislature intended to condone all deliberate defaults specified in clauses (a), (b) and ( ..... the purposes of this section :........''28. (1) if the income-tax officer, the appellate assistant commissioner or the appellate tribunal, in the course of any proceedings under this act, is satisfied, that any person -(a) has without reasonable cause failed to furnish the return of his total income which he was required to furnish by notice given .....

The State Vs. Darshan Singh Gobind Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1259

..... code, or something more than that? if it is something more, the jurisdiction of the high court is not ousted by section 3(2) of the contempt of courts act.so judged, there could be no doubt that the aspersions cast in the present case amounted to scandalizing the court itself, and were no mere-personal insult, and the high court ..... constitutes contempt of court. as observed by lord russell of killowen c. j. in the queen v. gray (1900) 2 qbd 36, 'any act done or writing published calculated to bring a court or a judge of the court into contempt or to lower his authority, is a contempt of court' lord hardwicke l.c. hag described this kind of contempt ..... conceivably be desorbed as a mere criticism of this sort. it was a flagrant and open attack on the judge himself, besides being extremely insulting. the power of the high court under the contempt of courts act 1952 (act 32 of 1952), hereinafter called the act is as follows:3 (1) subject to the provision of sub-section (2) every high court shall .....

Narayanprasad Haribhai Majmudar and anr. Vs. Merubhai Rayabhai and anr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1967)8GLR897

..... 71. section 71, argued the petitioners, was mandatory in its terms and it provided clearly and specifically that, save as expressly provided by the tenancy act, all inquiries and other proceedings before the mamlatdar or the tribunal shall be commenced by an application which shall contain the particulars set out in the section. the petitioners ..... 71. this contention is unsustainable and must be rejected. section 71 undoubtedly requires that save as expressly provided by or under the tenancy act all inquiries and other proceedings before the agricultural lands tribunal shall be commenced by an application and, therefore, unless there is some express provision to the contrary, ..... dahyabhai v. the gujarat revenue tribunal civil appeal no. 365 of 1966, to which i have already referred, confirmed the view taken by the learned judge. dealing with the argument of the appellant that the agricultural lands tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with the question whether the appellant was or was not .....

Kuttisamy thevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1967)2MLJ503

..... the attempt to murder and of murder the accused other than the appellants were charged with constructive liability by reason of section 149, indian penal code. the learned sessions judge, however, found that there was no unlawful assembly, and that, except for the first three accused who are the appellants here, the charges were rot proved as against ..... section 34 requires evidence of a particular common intention. in certain cases where section 149 is employed, it may well be that the common intention to commit a particular act in the course of the incident may not be established. but before section 34 can be used, such a common intention must necessarily be made out. that the ..... , in so far as the conviction is under section 34, we have to discover what the common intention was, for, if it should so happen that the act by one of the accused has exceeded that common intention or has been different from that common intention the other accused cannot possibly be made liable under section 34 .....

Joy Sankar Bhattacharjee Vs. Sushil Kumar Gupta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... is equally well settled that the presumption of innocence of the accused is further reinforced by his acquittal by the trial court and that the views of the trial judge as to the credibility of the witnesses must be given proper weight and consideration. it was also held that there must be substantial and compelling reasons for the ..... accounts before 1.9.1960, and filed the criminal case against the respondents on 7.11.1960, which was committed to the sessions.3. the learned assistant sessions judge framed charges against the 1st respondent under sections 408 and 477-a i.p.c. and framed charges against the other respondents under the same sections read with ..... confessional statement made on oath by an accused person before the assistant registrar of co-operative societies in an inquiry held by him in regard to certain forged cheques is not necessarily inadmissible under section 24 of the indian evidence act. in ram singh v. state air 1959 all 518 it was held that to distinguish between a .....

Muhammad Akhtar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ767All

..... of the bench. he held that article 310 was subject to the exception expressly provided in the constitution. it is not subject to the acts or the rules that may be framed under article 309. with respect, i am not in agreement with the observations of mishra, j. ..... case of barium chemicals, ltd. v. co. law board a.i.r, 1967 s.c. 295, under section 237(b) of the companies act, 1956, the central government could order an investigation if in its opinion the circum-stances set out in sub-clause (i), (ii) or (iii ..... the supreme court was followed in this court in kedar nath pandey v. state of uttar pradesh : (1968)iillj6all .4. for the petitioner reliance was placed upon a decision of the patna high court. tarak nath ghosh v. government of india ..... : (1968)illj376pat . there mishra, j., held that the pleasure of the president means that no employee can necessarily insist upon continuation .....

Torsion Products Ltd. and anr. Vs. Director of Industries, Hyderabad a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP374

..... board in ordering the house to be pulled down.'in the particular case the privy council thought that though the commissioner acted with perfect good faith he had not given a hearing to the defendant in the sense in which judges used the word. 14. in this connection i may also usefully refer to the observations of lord parker c. j ..... ., in a very recent judgment in in re, h. k. (an infant), 1967-2 wlr 962. '.... .... .... .... i doubt whether it can be said that the immigration authorities are acting in a judicial or quasi ..... and an honest or bona fide decision must, as it seems to me require not merely impartially, nor merely bringing one's mind to bear on the problem, but acting fairly and to the limited extent that the circumstances of any particular case allow, and within the legislative framework under which the administrator is working, only to the limited .....

Ramekbal Tiwary Vs. Madan Mohan Tiwary and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1156; 1967(0)BLJR646; 1967CriLJ1076; [1967]2SCR368

..... by the court of session and that an accused person has been improperly discharged by the inferior court, the sessions judge or district magistrate may cause him to be arrested, any may thereupon, instead of directing a fresh inquiry, order him to be committed for trial upon the matter of which he has been, in the opinion of ..... offence and, having done so, may proceed as regards the minor offence or offences under chapter xxi or other appropriate chapter. in fact, a magistrate cannot proceed to act under the latter part of sub-section (1) of section 209 until he has 'discharged' the accused under the former part of the sub-section. this is the ..... appellant because section 403(4) provides that a person acquitted or convicted of any offence constituted by any acts may, notwithstanding such acquittal or conviction, be subsequently charged with, and tried for, any other offence constituted by the same acts which he may have committed if the court by which he was first tried was not competent to .....