Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 5 of about 665 results (0.195 seconds)

Narayandas S. Kanuga Vs. Sarasvatibai D. Joshi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1968Bom280; (1967)69BOMLR622; 1967MhLJ946

..... is with these kinds of construction that the great right of vicinity is claimed by them. the second case is rightly distinguished by mr. justice palekar.(11) the trial judge has very lightly granted the injunction. principles of granting temporary injunctions are well settled. order 39, rules 1 and 2 provide for such injunctions. rule 1 does not ..... : air1967bom94 mr. advani relying upon mansata films distributors v. sorab modi : air1955bom266 contended that an appeal will not lie where the order is made by a single judge only in connection with a step in aid in the suit, but where the interlocutory order determines the right of a party pro tanto, the party affected has a right ..... 88 cal. lj 78. in the first case, the petition was under s. 45 of the specific relief act on the original side of the high court. the proposed building 13 was so near the building 21, that the learned judge recognising that the existence of the element of 'legal right' depends upon the facts of each case said on .....

Secretary, Home (Endowments), Andhra Pradesh Vs. Digyadarsam Rajindra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC105; [1967]3SCR891

..... endowment, as the case may be, and shall report the matter forthwith to the commissioner. (2) upon the receipt of such report, if the commissioner, after making such inquiry as he deems necessary, is satisfied that an arrangement for the administration of the math and its endowments or of the specific endowment, as the case may be, is ..... action, as against the respondent, for breach of those conditions. 11. mr. i. v. rangacharya, learned counsel for the respondent fully supports the reasons given by the learned judges of the high court, for accepting the claim made by his client, in the writ petition. 12. the short question that arises, for considerations, is as to whether the ..... the office of the trustee of the math, so as to enable the appellant to take action, under s. 53 of the act. the high court has, in this connection, referred to the findings recording by the subordinate judge's court, in favour of the respondent, in o. s. 50 of 1962. the mere circumstances that after a person has .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ram Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC881; 1968(16)BLJR606; 1968CriLJ1025; [1968]2SCR522

..... through s. 326, namely, causing grievous injury by burning to the two major offences, namely, culpable homicide not amounting to murder and even murder itself. the sessions judge chose the lowest end of the spectrum which is surprising enough, because the burns were so extensive that they were certainly grievous by all account. the high court placed ..... ram prasad falls within culpable homicide not amounting to murder or the higher offence of murder itself. here we see that death has actually been caused by the criminal act; in other words, there has been homicide and since it is not accidental or suicidal death, responsibility for the homicide, in the absence of any exceptions or ..... code. in other words, his offence was culpable homicide amounting to murder even if he did not intend causing the death of mst. rajji. he committed an act so imminently dangerous that it was in all probability likely to cause death or to result in an injury that was likely to cause death. we are accordingly of .....

Joginder Singh Inder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1968CriLJ858

..... fine of two hundred rupees vide his order dated the 27th april, 1966. the petitioner filed an appeal against that order which was dismissed by shri raghu singh, additional sessions judge, amritsar dated the 12th august, 1966. the petitioner still was not satisfied and has approached this court in revision.3. mr. giani, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the ..... of the above facts, the case against the petitioner was registered and after the investigation he was sent up for trial under section 61(1)(c) of the punjab excise act, 1914. the trial was held by shri k.c. maini, magistrate first glass, who found the charge proved against the petitioner, convicted him accordingly and sentenced him to sis months .....

Pannalal Vs. Murarilal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1967(0)BLJR749; [1967]2SCR757

..... that this statement is false. the respondent filed an affidavit stating that the appellant was directly informed of the passing of this ex-parte decree by the first civil judge on august 16, 1958. this statement was not denied by the appellant. the courts below concurrently found that the appellant was personally present in the court of the ..... the ex-parte decree passed in suit no. 22 of 1958. this application was numbered as miscellaneous case no. 104 of 1958. on august 16, 1958, the first civil judge, kanpur, passed an order setting aside this ex-parte decree on certain conditions. the order sheet in o.s. no. 22 of 1958, misc. case no. 104 of ..... bachawat, j. 1. this appeal incidentally raises a question of interpretation of article 164 of the indian limitation act, 1908. the respondent instituted two suits against the appellant in the court of the first civil judge, kanpur. suit no. 25 of 1958 was for the recovery of moneys due on a mortgage for rs. 50,000. suit no. 22 of 1958 .....

Sanjeevappa Vs. Ajjappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1969Kant293; AIR1969Mys293

..... court rejected the application for amendment. sir basil scott, c. j. speaking for the bench observed as follows:--'in this case we cannot agree with the learned judge of the court below that an amendment such as was asked for would convert the suit into a suit of different and inconsistent character. the suit would remain the ..... plaintiff (petitioner) had contended that the defendant (respondent) was an agriculturist and had claimed the extended period of limitation under s. 24 of the mysore agriculturists' relief act. in the amendment application, the petitioner stated that recent enquiries revealed that the defendant has admitted the suit debts in his loan application to the land mortgage bank. ..... as being barred by time as the plaintiff is not entitled to claim the benefit of extended period of limitation provided under section 24 of m.a.r. act. consequently the suit is dismissed with costs as being barred by time.'5. it is therefore clear that the learned munsiff did not apply his mind to .....

Durvuri Papi Reddi and ors. Vs. Duvvuri Rami Reddi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP362

..... 115, civil p. c., in this case.25. i must however observe that the learned subordinate judge was not correct in generalising the issue and widening the scope of either the inquiry or the evidence or even while determining the question. the next friend may have referred to the ..... suit should be appointed for him and that if he is found not to be a minor, the guardian appointed for the inquiry indicated by section 443 should case to act, the defendant conducting his own case.'18. to the same effect is ramgobind v. sital singh, air 1926 pat 489 ..... he is a minor as not being a minor and thereby to ignore the general principle that a minor cannot act for himself, but to indicate that a finding that he is really a minor is necessary to the appointment of a guardian for ..... the suit and to act on his behalf in the conduct of the case. no sufficient reason appears from the letter of reference for trying the question .....

Giles Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the girl and foster is open to the construction that these key witnesses deliberately concealed from the judge, jury, and defense counsel evidence of the girl's promiscuity. [ footnote 6 ] while, under the law of maryland, specific acts of misconduct are inadmissible to impeach a witness' credibility, rau v. state, 133 md. 613, ..... juvenile proceeding) or of the fact that montgomery county police officials knew of such evidence. if a new hearing is held in the state courts, an inquiry into these matters might be deemed appropriate. [ footnote 7 ] the record before us affirmatively demonstrates that both detective collins and mr. kardy, who supervised the ..... by the plurality is bottomed upon materials entirely outside the record before us, furnished to this court after the case was submitted, under the leverage of inquiries put from the bench during the argument. the materials are two pre-indictment police reports, the montgomery county officers' report and the supplementary offense report. .....

Keyishian Vs. Board of Regents

Court : US Supreme Court

..... recommend appointment. an appointment or recommendation for appointment shall constitute a certification by the appointing or page 385 u. s. 620 recommending officer that due inquiry has been made and that he finds no reason to believe that the candidate is disqualified for the appointment. further resolved that this resolution shall become ..... to appellants in holding them constitutional. it is significant that appellees consistently defended the constitutionality of these sections in the courts below. moreover, the three-judge court rendered its decision upon the basis of a "stipulation of fact," paragraph 20 of which recites: "section 3022 incorporates in full by reference and ..... state, shall be removed from such position for the utterance of any treasonable or seditious word or words or the doing of any treasonable or seditious act or acts while holding such position. 3022. elimination of subversive persons from the public school system 1. the board of regents shall adopt, promulgate, and .....

Suryamani Tarai and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1967Ori189; 33(1967)CLT576; 1967CriLJ1552

..... under section 161 (3) of allthe persons whom the prosecution proposesto examine as its witnesses would be furnished to the accused free of cost before the inquiry or trial begins.7. judged by the aforesaid test, the petitioners are not entitled to copies of the statements in question of p. ws. 2 and 5 free of cost ..... time and place stated in the summons or order. (3) nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the indian evidence act, 1872, sections 123 and 124. .......... these two sections of the evidence act deal with as to affairs of the state and official communications. it is conceded by the learned additional standing counsel that there is ..... certified copies of the statements of p. ws. 2 and 5 in the suicide case. the learned assistant sessions judge got himself completely confused in holding that these statements are privileged under sections 123 and 124, evidence act. though the investigation in the suicide case and the investigation under ex. 9 are not in one and the same .....