Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 3 of about 665 results (0.160 seconds)

Aug 18 1967 (HC)

Shantilal Ratnaji Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-18-1967

Reported in : 1970CriLJ97

..... and if in that mutual fight one causes injury to the other, no right of private defence is available to either side and in those circumstances, the learned sessions judge was perfectly right in convicting him for an offence under section 304, part it of the indian penal code.7. before we actually go to the appreciation of evidence ..... under the general exceptions in chapter iv of the indian penal code, for it is the contention of mr. vin that much though section 105 of the indian evidence act contemplates that the burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the general exceptions in the indian penal code or within any special exception or ..... to fight had indulged in fighting after getting themselves armed with sticks and if in that fight any person gets injured, he must face the consequences arising out of that act and he is not entitled to invoke the aid of any such right of private defence. that would require me to consider as to what can be called a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 1967 (FN)

Longshoremen Vs. Marine Trade Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-06-1967

..... a rule to show cause why the union and its officers should not be held in contempt for violating the september 15 order. without explaining precisely what acts violated the order, the judge held the february strike "illegal . . . under the circumstances," found the union in civil contempt, and fined the union $100,000 per day. ..... points in the proceedings, it appeared that the alleged violation consisted of the work stoppage during the last few days of february; but at other times, the inquiry focused upon the union's request for a grievance meeting on february 28 to discuss the latest set-back problem. "why," counsel for the association asked, ..... client." "mr. scanlan: no, i have nothing further, your honor." "the court: the hearing is closed." thus, despite counsel's repeated requests, the district judge steadfastly refused to explain the meaning of the order. when further set-back disputes disrupted work throughout the port of philadelphia in late february, 1966, the district court issued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1967 (HC)

Balak Ram Vaish Vs. Badri Prasad Avasthi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-27-1967

Reported in : AIR1969All88

..... every officer of the seniorand junior division posted or appointedto a unit or part thereof shall be entitledto such allowances as are specified inschedule ii. the learned judge who decided that case pointed out that fromthese rules read with schedule ii it appeared that a junior division officer wasentitled firstly to pay (ranging betweenrs. ..... a decisive factor. in that case the person whose election was challenged was appointed by the committee of the durgah endowment constituted under the durgah khwaja sahib act (act xxxvi of. 1955). no doubt, although the committee or the members of the committee were removable by the government of : india, the appointment of the ..... some high court or by the supreme court. the election tribunals, as they stood constituted prior to the recent amendment of the representation of the people act, were subordinate authorities and were under the superintendence of the various high courts under article 227 of the constitution. the orders by them were amenable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1967 (SC)

Dhara Singh Vs. District Judge, Meerut and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-1967

Reported in : AIR1968SC227; [1968]1SCR243

..... upon the making of such an application the petition shall stand withdrawn and no further action shall be taken for its trial. 43. findings of the judge - (1) if the judge after making such inquiry as he deems fit finds in respect of any person whose election is called in question by a petition, that his election was valid he shall ..... votes and chose to draw a lot, and declared pitam singh as the elected candidate. dhara singh thereupon filed an election petition under the act and the rules raising a number of points. the district judge, who heard the election petition, held that the returning officer made a mistake in not crediting pitam singh with the third preference in ballot ..... the interpretation of the rules. in that case, this court was concerned with the interpretation of sections 97, 100(1)(d) and 101(a) of the representation of the people act (43 of 1951) and r. 57(1) of the conduct of election rules, 1961. we find that the term of those sections are different and in particular, s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1967 (HC)

J.W. Benon Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-08-1967

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT483

..... of the authorities. the learned counsel for the petitioners admitted that the petitioners filed an application under section 18 of the land acquisition act (annexure r-4), before the court of the district judge. but he also pointed out that it was specifically stated in the said petition that the petition was presented without prejudice to the ..... will be to the convenience of all concerned and would serve the interests of justice.' it has to be ntoiced that the learned judge laid emphasis on the proceeding and the order under the land acquisition act being a single one though affecting a large number of persons. (29) thus, in view of the recent decisions of the ..... rao, c, j. and srinivaschari, j. held that the petitioners were aggrieved by a single act of the collector, and a common question of law and fact arose, and, thereforee, a single application was maintainable, la that case, the learned judges, declining to follow a full bench decision of the high court of patna in collector of monghy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1967 (HC)

The Chatusshakhiya Brahmavrinda Gayaran Trust Vs. the Union of India ( ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-06-1967

Reported in : (1968)70BOMLR407

..... learned assistant government pleader contended that ad valorem court-fee would be payable in view of section 8 of the said act. the learned judge held that the order of the arbitrator could not be deemed to be a decree of a court, nor was it ..... in these appeals runs into thousands of rupees. we felt doubtful about the correctness of the amount of court-fee paid and on inquiry we were told that fixed court-fee of rs. 5 was accepted by the office of this court in view of the ..... schedule[s] that the amount is to be determined. after referring to the decision of this court in hirji virji's case, the learned judge further observed (p. 34) :. in my opinion, therefore, for a matter to be brought within section 8 there must be an ..... to set aside or award sought to be set aside or modify any award otherwise than under the modified, according to the scale arbitration act, 1940. article 1. prescribed under11. mr. gumaste, the learned government pleader on behalf of the union of india, contends that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1967 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Hari Ram Murari Mal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-29-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H40

..... if any question arises whether a sum is payable to the government or to the custodian within the meaning of sub-section (1), the custodian shall, after making such inquiry as he may deem fit, and giving to the person by whom the sum is alleged to be payable an opportunity of being heard decide the question; and the decision ..... managing officer, defendant no. 3, resisted the plaintiff's claim amongst others also on the ground that the suit was not cognizable by a civil court. the trial judge framed necessary issues including the one, whether the civil court had no jurisdiction to hear the suit which was treated as preliminary and decided against the defendants.the revision ..... finally approved by the supreme court in abdul karim haji tayab v. deputy custodian-general, air 1964 sc 1256 which laid down-'the amended section 48 came into the act by act no. 91 of 1956 from october 22. 1956. sub-sections (1) and (2) are clearly procedural and would apply to all cases which have to be investigated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1967 (HC)

The State of Gujarat Vs. Jamadar Mansingrao Bhagvatrao

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-10-1967

Reported in : (1969)10GLR537

..... state a.l.r. 1958, allahabad 429, a division bench of the allahabad high court has observed as under:the criminal law amendment act (1952) has created special judges who differ from the sessions judges only in this respect that they follow a different mode of trial, but all the other provisions of the criminal procedure code apply to both alike ..... deals with constitution of court of sessions for every sessions division. section 17 of the code deals with a topic regarding subordination of judicial magistrates and benches to sessions judge.section 17(b) of the code, which is very material for our purposes, runs as under:courts of sessions and courts of magistrates (including courts of presidency ..... 435 of the code.it should be made clear that by the special jurisdiction we mean special jurisdiction to hold an inquiry or to pass an order; as regards the trials for offences created by acts other than the indian penal code, the code bad made a provision (we have referred to section 5(2). once .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1967 (HC)

Babulal Rukmanand Vs. Official Liquidator, Bharatpur Oil Mills (Privat ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-08-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj214; [1969]39CompCas670(Raj)

..... construction of such a statement unless it is shown that it was made clearly without intending to admit the existence of such relationship. with all respect to the learned judges who decided kashinath shankarappa's case. air 1951 nag 255. i do not therefore find it possible to follow the view expressed in it. besides, that case ..... counsel has placed reliance on kashinath shankarappa v. new akot cotton ginning and pressing co. ltd.. air 1951 nag 255.7. what section 19 of the limitation act, 1908 requires is that where before the expiration of the period prescribed for a suit or application in respect of any property or right, an acknowledgment of liability ..... thoroughly acquainted with the affairs of the company, and technical hurdles as to procedure are not viewed with favour and have to be overcome the liquidator has to act fairly and honourably in considering the claims of persons against the company. this is why supervisory jurisdiction has been vested in the court under section 460 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1967 (HC)

In Re: Hiren Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-07-1967

Reported in : AIR1969Cal1,1969CriLJ40,72CWN82

..... when called upon to exercise its summary power in cases of contempt of scandalising the court itself.:-- 'in the first place, the reflection on the conduct or character of a judge in reference to the discharge of his judicial duties, would not be contempt if such reflection is made in the exercise of the right of fair and reasonable criticism which ..... every citizen possesses in respect of public acts done in the seat of justice. it is not by stifling criticism that confidence in courts can be created............. in the second place, when attacks or comments are made on ..... default, the matter be placed for further orders before this bench. if the fine is paid, the rule shall be deemed to have been disposed of. 16. the sheriff to act on a signed copy of the minutes. sinha, c.j.17. i agree. ray, j. 18. i agree. amaresh roy, j. 19. : i agree. b.c. mitra, j. 20. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //