Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 31 of about 665 results (0.220 seconds)

Pierson Vs. Ray

Court : US Supreme Court

..... inquiry, or the threat of such inquiry, into whether, in fact, a judge has been unfaithful to his oath of office. thus, it is necessary to protect the guilty as well as the innocent. [ footnote 2/ ..... motive not connected with the public good." gregoire v. biddle, 177 f.2d 579, 581. to deny recovery to a person injured by the ruling of a judge acting for personal gain or out of personal motives would be "monstrous." ibid. but it is argued that absolute immunity is necessary to prevent the chilling effects of a judicial ..... refuses to disperse and move on, or disperse or move on, when ordered so to do by any law enforcement officer of any municipality, or county, in which such act or acts are committed, or by any law enforcement officer of the state of mississippi, or any other authorized person, . . . shall be guilty of disorderly conduct, which is .....

Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and declined to decide, pending the outcome of greyhound's 60-day offer, the questions of control under 5 of the interstate commerce act or anticompetitive effect under 7 of the clayton act. a three-judge district court sustained the icc order. held: 1. the icc is required, as a general rule, under its duty to determine ..... 5. section 5 not only deals explicitly with problems of control, but it establishes the public interest criteria which the icc is bound to use in making that type of inquiry. for example, the commission must consider "(1) the effect of the proposed transaction upon adequate transportation service to the public; . . . (3) the total fixed ..... period, and because no prejudice to any party's interests could result from the delay. ii we do not agree that congress limited icc consideration under 20a to an inquiry into fiscal manipulation. [ footnote 4 ] even if congress' primary concern was to prevent such manipulation, the broad terms "public interest" and "lawful object" negate .....

Vaca Vs. Sipes

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the union's conduct was "willful, wanton and malicious." however, the jury must return a verdict for the defendants, the judge instructed, "if you find and believe from the evidence that the union and its representatives acted reasonably and in good faith in the handling and processing of the grievance of the plaintiff." r. at 161-162. the jury ..... , acted arbitrarily, or will it be sufficient to show that the employee's grievance was so meritorious that a reasonable union would ..... contract suit by an employee against an employer, the employee will have the additional burden of proving that the union acted arbitrarily or in bad faith. the court never explains what is meant by this vague phrase or how trial judges are intelligently to translate it to a jury. must the employee prove that the union, in fact .....

Afroyim Vs. Rusk

Court : US Supreme Court

..... by a 5-4 vote almost 10 years ago, has been a source of controversy and confusion ever since, as was emphatically recognized in the opinions of all the judges who participated in this case below. [ footnote 3 ] moreover, in the other cases decided with [ footnote 4 ] and since [ footnote 5 ] perez, ..... after the fourteenth amendment had been proposed, congress specifically considered the subject of expatriation. several bills were introduced to impose involuntary expatriation on citizens who committed certain acts. [ footnote 17 ] with little page 387 u. s. 264 discussion, these proposals were defeated. other bills, like the one proposed but defeated in ..... notice. the expatriation of unwilling citizens was apparently first discussed in the lengthy congressional debates of 1794 and 1795, which culminated eventually in the uniform naturalization act of 1795. [ footnote 2/5 ] 1 stat. 414. little contained in those debates is pertinent here. the present question was considered only in connection .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, Calcutta Vs. Smt. Anusuya Dev ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC779; [1968]68ITR750(SC); [1968]2SCR466

..... the income-tax officer or before the appellant assistant commissioner ought to have been given to her. holding that the order of the tribunal suffered from those infirmities the learned judges of the high court answered the question in the affirmative. 8. in our judgment the order of the high court cannot be sustained the statement that out of 584 high ..... copy of the declaration incorporated in the petition under s. 66(1) and that at the hearing of the appeal the original declaration had not been produced. 7. the learned judges of the high court who heard the reference were apparently of the view of that the question referred did not arise out of the order of the tribunal, but they .....

The Vith Income-tax Officer, City Circle Ii-a, Bangalore Vs. K.Y. Pill ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC260; [1967]66ITR730(SC); [1968]1SCR6

..... 1961, set aside the order and directed the income-tax officer to make a fresh assessment after making inquiries on certain matters specified in the order. 2. at the request of the respondents under s. 66(2) of the mysore income-tax act, the commissioner of income-tax, mysore, referred the following question to the high court of mysore : ..... the reference, the respondents did not press the first question, and the high court answered the second question in the affirmative. 4. the income-tax officer commenced inquiry directed by the appellate assistant commissioner. the respondents then applied to the high court of mysore for issue of writ of prohibition restraining the income-tax officer from ..... the order of assessment dated may 21, 1954, but he did not set aside the notice served upon the respondents. he merely remanded the case for further inquiry to be made in the light of the directions given by him. it is difficult to appreciate the grounds on which it could be held that the proceeding .....

C.S. Angre Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1968MP168a; [1968]69ITR336(MP); 1968MPLJ135

..... taken into account; (ii) debts which are secured on, or which have been incurred in relation to any property in respect of which wealth-tax is not chargeable under this act; *****' section 2(e) defines 'assets'. that definition is as follows:--'(e) 'assets' includes property of every description, moveable or immovable but does not include - (i ..... has been defined in section 2(m) thus :--'(m) 'net wealth' means the amount by which the aggregate value computed in accordance with the provisions of this act of all the assets, wherever located, belonging to the assessee on the valuation date, including assets required to be included in his net wealth as on that date ..... be included in the net wealth.' the wealth tax officer, therefore, issued to the present assessee a notice for reassessment under section 17(1)(b) of the act. in the reassessment proceedings the assessee objected to the validity of the notice under section 17(1)(b) and also reiterated his contention that the compensation instalments .....

Dhara Singh Vs. District Judge, Meerut and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC227; [1968]1SCR243

..... upon the making of such an application the petition shall stand withdrawn and no further action shall be taken for its trial. 43. findings of the judge - (1) if the judge after making such inquiry as he deems fit finds in respect of any person whose election is called in question by a petition, that his election was valid he shall ..... votes and chose to draw a lot, and declared pitam singh as the elected candidate. dhara singh thereupon filed an election petition under the act and the rules raising a number of points. the district judge, who heard the election petition, held that the returning officer made a mistake in not crediting pitam singh with the third preference in ballot ..... the interpretation of the rules. in that case, this court was concerned with the interpretation of sections 97, 100(1)(d) and 101(a) of the representation of the people act (43 of 1951) and r. 57(1) of the conduct of election rules, 1961. we find that the term of those sections are different and in particular, s. .....

Rattan Chand and ors. Vs. Arora Provision Stores

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT61

..... and also to some payment of a substantial amount in lieu of which the plto in question was releaaed in favor of the lessees. the finding of the learned district judge may hereby reproduced in his own words :- 'asi have stated above, the vorious factors mentioned clea.rly show that the respondent who kept quiet over the continuous possession of ..... where it did, or there has been material irregularity or illegality' in the exercise of that jurisdiction. the right there is confined to jurisdiction and jurisdiction alone. in toher acts, th? power is nto so limited, and the high court is enabled to call for the record of a case to satisfy itself that the decision therein is according to ..... of first instance. on receipt of the report this revision would be set down for hearing. (10) parties are directed to appear in the trinl court on 8th january, 1968 when antoher short date would be given for production of evidence. the report should be submitted to this court by the middle of february .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Manilal Joitaram and Co.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC653; 1968CriLJ661; (1968)0GLR479; [1968]2SCR177

..... non-transferable specific delivery contracts were so arranged that they could be resolved after the period of eleven days and without actual delivery. the sessions judge was of the opinion that the respondents had acted in breach of the proviso to s. 18(1) and were clearly guilty of the offence. in a precise and clear judgment the additional ..... performance of non-transferable specific delivery contracts otherwise than by making or receiving actual delivery, the acts of the appellants were not offences under the act. the learned judge while dealing with s. 18(1) proviso observed : 'the performance of a non-transferable specific delivery contract by a mode other than giving and taking of actual ..... of them (accused 1 to 9) were further convicted under s. 21(c) of the act and fined rs. 25/- (one week's s. i. in default). the remaining accused were convicted under s. 21(b). all appealed to the court of sessions judge. the conviction of accused 1 to 9, 11 and 12 was maintained but conviction under .....