Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1967 Page 30 of about 665 results (0.313 seconds)

Udall Vs. Fpc

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the power supplied is relevant to the issue of the public interest. so too is the regional need for the additional power. but the inquiry should not stop there. a license under the act empowers the licensee to construct, for its own use and benefit, hydroelectric projects utilizing the flow of navigable waters and thus, in effect ..... firm capacity for the pacific northwest." "the total power resource of the area is therefore predictably in excess of all foreseeable requirements thereon for the period through 1968-1969 and sufficient to meet all requirements until at least 1972-1973, and potentially for years beyond that date. the addition of high mountain sheep dam will ..... be licensed to construct the project. i would affirm the judgments in both cases substantially for the reasons given in judge miller's opinion below, as amplified by the considerations contained in this opinion. [ footnote 2/1 ] administrative procedure act 10(e), 5 u.s.c. 706(2)(e) (1964 ed., supp. ii). see also universal .....

Mahendrakumar Iswarlal and Company Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1967)2MLJ146

..... that it was a tax and not a fee in return for services to be rendered by the corporation. the majority of learned judges observed:.the act does not provide for any services of special kind being rendered resulting in benefits to the person on whom it is imposed. the work of inspection done by ..... but they were, however served by the commercial tax officer, north arcot, with a notice dated 21st january, 1963, provisionally proposing to levy under the madras general sales tax act, 1959, tax on a total turnover of rs. 32,05,977-50. the notice mentioned that the petitioners had effected purchases of groundnut for the period from 1st april, ..... business in jaggery, groundnut and other articles at vellore and tirupattur in north arcot district. this district has been declared under section 4(1) of the madras commercial crops act, 1933, to be a notified area in respect of groundnut and certain other commodities. the petitioners state that on their purchases of groundnuts in the notified area in the .....

Baltimore and Ohio R. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... routes and channels of trade wherever practicable. in other words, although the icc was directed to draw up a national plan against which it was to judge whether applications for consolidation were in the public interest, the judgment was to be made rather mechanically, and the plan itself was to be designed to ..... the revenue indemnification condition until further order. erie-lackawanna and other railroads filed suit seeking an interlocutory injunction restraining the consummation of the merger. a three-judge court declined to grant the injunction. held: in the light of its findings as to the necessity for interim protection for the three "protected railroads," the ..... of discerning judgment to a wide range of factors, and preclude the position that the purpose of the 1940 act is simply to promote railroad consolidation. [ footnote 2/5 ] the icc has recognized that inquiry into a proposed transaction does not end with the possibilities for increased economics, but extends to "the effect of .....

Prima Paint Corp. Vs. Flood and ConklIn Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... agreement were enforceable in federal court but not in the state court, id. at 350 u. s. 204 , posed a choice of two alternatives for judge medina. if he held that the arbitration act rested solely on congress' power, widely recognized in 1925 but negated in erie, to prescribe general federal law applicable in diversity cases, he would be compelled ..... not encroach upon the province of the individual states." cohen & dayton, the new federal arbitration law, 12 va.l.rev. 265, 276-277. all this indicates that the 4 inquiry of whether the making of the arbitration agreement is in issue is to be determined by reference to state law, not federal law formulated by ..... u.s.c. 152(7). in other instances, congress has chosen more restrictive language. fair labor standards act of 1938, 52 stat. 1062, 6, as amended, 29 u.s.c. 206. prior to this case, this court has always made careful inquiry to assure itself that it is applying a statute with the coverage that congress intended, so that the meaning .....

United States Vs. Robel

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of congressional power to utilize a prophylactic device such as 5(a)(1)(d) to safeguard against espionage and sabotage at essential defense facilities would not end inquiry in this case. even if the statute is not overbroad on its face -- because there may be "defense facilities" so essential to our national security ..... liberty consistent with the security of the country. in so doing, it arrogates to itself an independent judgment of the requirements of national security. these are matters about which judges should be wary. james madison wrote: "security against foreign danger is one of the primitive objects of civil society. . . ." ". . . the means of ..... care that congress took to provide for the determination by the sacb that the party is a communist-action organization, and for judicial review of that determination. the act "requires the registration only of organizations which . . . are found to be under the direction, domination, or control of certain foreign powers and to operate .....

Zwickler Vs. Koota

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that its sweep embraces anonymous handbills both within and outside the protection of the first amendment. cf. talley v. california, 362 u. s. 60 . a three-judge court, one judge dissenting, applied the doctrine of abstention and dismissed the complaint, [ footnote 4 ] remitting appellant to the new york courts page 389 u. s. 245 to assert ..... district court on the remand. see n 3, supra. multer has since been elected to the supreme court of new york and will take office on january 1, 1968. new york times, p. 31, col. 2, november 8, 1967. [ footnote 17 ] our discussion of the issue of injunctive relief in dombrowski is at 380 ..... the declaratory judgment act, sought in the district court declaratory relief and an injunction against future criminal prosecutions for violating the statute, claiming that, on its face, the statute contravened the first amendment by its "overbreadth." a three-judge court applied the doctrine of abstention and dismissed the complaint, leaving the appellant to assert .....

United States Vs. Sealy, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... u. s. 127 , 384 u. s. 147 -148 (1966). [ footnote 5 ] within settled doctrine, they are unlawful under 1 of the sherman act without the necessity for an inquiry page 388 u. s. 358 in each particular case as to their business or economic justification, their impact in the marketplace, or their reasonableness. accordingly, ..... practice in the context of the facts found by the trial court. the district court, however, made no findings in respect to this theory for judging liability, since the government insisted on trying the case in per se terms, attempting to prove only a horizontal conspiracy. although sealy did introduce some ..... complaint alleges price-fixing and market allocations by serta, which it has denied. defendant alleges the agreements made were reasonable ancillary restraints, valid under the sherman act, and the evidence sought by this subpoena would completely corroborate the reasonableness. the plaintiff, the government, has also filed a brief supportive of the motion to .....

Berger Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... responsibility on this court in its supervision of the fairness of procedures. . . ." at 385 u. s. 329 , n. 7. there, two judges acting jointly authorized the installation of a device on the person of a prospective witness to record conversations between him and an attorney for a defendant then on trial ..... electronic surveillance. the other members of the commission have serious doubts about the desirability of such authority, and believe that, without the kind of searching inquiry that would result from further congressional consideration of electronic surveillance, particularly of the problems of bugging, there is insufficient basis to strike this balance against ..... recording, although an invasion of the privacy protected by the page 388 u. s. 57 fourth amendment, was admissible because of the authorization of the judges, based upon "a detailed factual affidavit alleging the commission of a specific criminal offense directly and immediately affecting the administration of justice . . . for .....

State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. Vs. Tashire

Court : US Supreme Court

..... never be "claimants" against the insurer? i cannot believe that congress launched such an irrational scheme. the court rests heavily on the fact that the 1948 act contains the phrase "may claim," while the 1926 and 1936 interpleader statutes contained the phrase "are claiming." from this change in language, the court infers that ..... have been a tenable position under the 1926 [ footnote 8 ] and 1936 interpleader statutes. [ footnote 9 ] these statutes did not carry forward the language in the 1917 act authorizing interpleader where adverse claimants "may claim" benefits as well as where they "are claiming" them. [ footnote 10 ] in 1948, however, in the revision of the ..... judge weinfeld's opinion in twentieth century-fox film corp. v. taylor, 239 f.supp. 913, 918-921 (d.c.s.d.n.y.1965), and in ali, study of the division of jurisdiction between state and federal courts 180-190 (official draft, pt. 1, 1965); 3 moore, federal practice 22.09, at 3033-3037; chafee, federal interpleader since the act .....

Utah Pie Co. Vs. Continental Baking Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... jury found for continental, and although petitioner failed to move for a directed verdict on the counterclaim before its submission to the jury, the trial judge granted petitioner's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. the court of appeals reversed the judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the counterclaim, and remanded the ..... from surrounding economic circumstances, which would include persistent unprofitable sales below cost and drastic price cuts themselves discriminatory. see rowe, price discrimination under the robinson-patman act 141-150 (1962), commenting on the court's statement in f.t.c. v. anheuser-busch, inc., supra, that "a price reduction below cost ..... down, and, at other times, each of the respondents also bore responsibility for the downward pressure on the price structure. we believe that the act reaches price discrimination that erodes competition as much as it does price discrimination that is intended to have immediate destructive impact. in this case, the .....