Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1960 Page 12 of about 434 results (0.208 seconds)

Varkey Joseph Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1960Ker301

..... at his residence. subsequently the charge sheet was filed and after committal by the sub-divisional magistrate's court. alleppey the case came up before the learned sessions judge, alleppey.3. the accused gave a statement, ext. p-14, before the committal court, substantially admittingthe prosecution case. however, his case in the statement was ..... on their testimony. there is no bar legally to accept even the uncorroborated testimony of a child witness and only prudence requires that the court should not act on the uncorroborated evidence of a child.in the present case these witnesses, as will be clear hereafter, are fully corroborated by other eyewitnesses. the other ..... his questioning the witnesses and his satisfaction regarding the competency of the witnesses.we would at this stage observe that it is very desirable that a trial judge should preserve on record, apart from the evidence of the child witness in the case, the questions he put to the witness in the preliminary examination .....

Ranchhod Mula Vs. State

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1961CriLJ472

..... of an officer of the mint upon any matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination or analysis and report may be used as evidence in an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the code. it is therefore necessary that the document must purport to be a report under the hand of an officer of the ..... him, the bundle containing the articles was lying outside his house. the appellant was kept outside and the panchanama was made in another house, the learned assistant sessions judge accepted the prosecution case, rejected the defence case and found that the articles in? question were in the possession of the appellant, that the appellant knowingly counterfeited or ..... no application to cases of improper admission or rejection of evidence. in the case of improper admission or rejection of evidence provisions of section 167 of the evidence act would apply. that section reads as under:the improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any .....

Trustees of Tollemache Settled Estates Vs. Coughtrie (inspector of Tax ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1961]43ITR448(Cal)

..... the resulting excess liability is only into case vi, schedule d, because that is a receptacle for oddments. it is said further that the resulting assessment would invoke an inquiry on schedule a principles; namely, what the unit is worth to be let by the year, having regard not only to the rent of 681 received this year, but ..... commissioners adopted that view. on an appeal by the tax-payers, who contended that there must be an assessment on schedule a principles with evidence as to value, the judge accepted their contention and remitted the case to the commissioners.the material part of section 175 reads as follows : '(1) if, as respects any year of assessment, the ..... from the substitution of these rent and royalty figures for the rack rent you are directed by section 176 to make your assessment in accordance with pare 3 of the act. what is more you are directed by section 175 to arrive at your reassessment by determining the annual value of the unit : and this conception of 'annual value .....

Steelworkers Vs. Warrior and Gulf Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to submit. yet, to be consistent with congressional policy in favor of settlement of disputes by the parties through the machinery of arbitration, the judicial inquiry under 301 must be strictly confined to the question whether the reluctant party did agree to arbitrate the grievance or did agree to give the arbitrator ..... using the arbitration process is primarily to further their common goal of uninterrupted production under the agreement, to make the agreement serve their specialized needs. the ablest judge cannot be expected to bring the same experience and competence to bear upon the determination of a grievance, because he cannot be similarly informed. the congress, ..... however, has, by 301 of the labor management relations act, assigned the courts the duty of determining whether the reluctant party has breached his promise to arbitrate. for arbitration is a matter of contract, and a .....

Davis Vs. Virginia Railway Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... improper treatment, thus aggravating page 361 u. s. 355 his injury, and that respondent was responsible for such negligence. at the close of the case, the trial judge sustained the motion of respondent to strike petitioner's evidence and discharged the jury. on petition for writ of error claiming that the issues should have been presented to ..... than a year. even the "junior brakeman" is shown by his undisputed testimony to have worked at that occupation for respondent for "about a year." moreover, no act -- either of commission or omission -- of those brakemen is shown to have in any way caused or contributed to cause petitioner to slip on and fall from the ..... 361 u. s. 357 -358. judgment reversed and cause remanded. mr. justice clark delivered the opinion of the court. this is a negligence case under the federal employers' liability act, 35 stat. 65, 45 u.s. c. 51. petitioner, an employee of respondent, was injured while shifting various railroad cars on its tracks in and about the ford .....

State Vs. Nathumal Damumal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1962Bom21; (1961)63BOMLR362; ILR1961Bom735

..... case. since the offence is clearly made out on the allegations, charge for this offence must be framed.(8) the result is that the reference made by the learned sessions judge must be rejected. in view of what i have stated above, i direct the learned magistrate, if he has not already done so, to frame an additional charge under section ..... of these goods. against this judgment accused nos. 4, 5 and 6 went in revision to the sessions court challenging the order oft learned trial magistrate. the learned sessions judge tool the view that in view of the fact that the sale in favour of accused no. 1 was completed by accused no. 2 and the others in calcutta and ..... the accused were prosecuted under section 18(a)(i),(ii) and (iii) of the drugs act, 1940. accused no. 2 had also given a warranty to accused no. 1, and therefore, an offence under section 28 was also alleged against accused nos. 2 to 6. preliminary inquiry was held by the learned magistrate and at that stage it was contended on behalf .....

Gandi Pudapunaidu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1961CriLJ461

..... recall any case which he has made over to, any magistrate subordinate to him, and may inquire into or try such case himself, or refer it for inquiry or trial to any other such magistrate competent to inquire into or try the same.' thus this provision empowers a district magistrate to withdraw a case from one ..... of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 10 of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 (central act v of 1898), the governor-of andhra pradesh hereby appoints the undermentioned additional district and sessions judge to be additional district magistrate in the district noted against his name and directs that he shall exercise all the powers ..... as that provision empowers only a chief presidency magistrate, district magistrate or sub-divisional magistrate to transfer a case of which he has taken cognizance, for inquiry or trial, to any magistrate subordinate to him, the learned judge observed:it is obvious that if the order dated 3-1-1959 was passed by the additional sessions .....

Govindan Neelambaran Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1960Ker258; 1960CriLJ1088

..... as a result of the stab injury sustained by him.4. the next question is whether the injury was inflicted by the accused. the learned judge has in para 5 of the judgment stated that the act of stabbing is not disputed by the accused. as stated earlier, the accused has not admitted that he stabbed and inflicted the injury. we ..... of going about with the penknife or that he had come armed with a penknife on that day to take revenge on raveendran as the learned sessions judge seems to think. the learned judge has observed in para 5 of his judgment that:'he first threw the stick at raveendran. the fact that he had run a little distance from the ..... evidence in the case and the circumstances and probabilities, we are not prepared to agree with the learned sessions judge that the attack by the accused was either 'intentional or retaliatory in nature.' it cannot, therefore, be said that the act of the accused amounts to an offence and we find that he is completely protected by the right of private .....

Madras Motor Insurance Co. Ltd., Madras Vs. Mohamed Mustafa Badsha and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1961Mad208; (1960)2MLJ202

..... 2) etc. however, the receipt does not appear to have been properly proved, and the learned judge felt some difficulty in accepting and acting upon it. but, for purposes of the present argument, i shall assume that the car was actually sold on that dale, and that defendant 2 became ..... vesting in defendant 1 alone on the date o! the accident.3. learned counsel far the company, sri r. gopalaswaini aiyangar, argues that this conclusion of the learned judge is opposed to certain facts of the documentary record, such as the receipt dated 8-1-1951 (ex. b-4, issued by sukumar productions to n. ramakrishna (defendant ..... and negligent, and that it recited in the death of the son of the plaintiffs, aged about 13, entitling the plaintiffs to claim for heavy damages. the learned judge came to the conclusion that, for want of sufficient evidence, he could not hold that the sale was established. he therefore held that the facts amounted to the .....

P. Govinda Chetty and ors. Vs. K. Lingaswami Chetty and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1960)2MLJ205

..... be compelled to hold an inquiry. if it decides that an inquiry is not necessary, the applicants can carry the matter no further; so much is conceded by the learned advocate for the appellant.4. again at page ..... upon this basis, and the question is whether the suit is maintainable; and whether the civil court can frame any scheme.3. the learned assistant city civil judge came to the conclusion that the court had no jurisdiction to frame a scheme, mainly placing reliance upon the bench decision of this court in pichu ayyangar v. ..... ramanuja jeer swamigal : air1940mad756 . in that decision, the question whether the civil courts have jurisdiction to frame a scheme after the passing of the madras hindu religious endowments act, 1927, was dealt with and answered in the negative. the following passages in the judgment of leach, c.j., are of significance (at page 885):the board cannot .....