Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1960 Page 7 of about 434 results (0.486 seconds)

Laxminarayan Fattelal Vs. Tulsiram Pandhari

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR487

..... a notice. he, however, admitted that the statement of his claim was not filed by him as required by section 8(1) of the relief of indebtedness act.9. the learned judge of the lower appellate court, while dealing with the question as to whether the creditor had complied with the provisions of section 8(1) of the relief of ..... court has held that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of section 8(1) of the belief of indebtedness act, and, therefore, it must be taken that the debt was duly discharged. the learned judge observed in para. 9 of his judgment:the next question would be regarding the legality of the order discharging the debt ..... indebtedness act, observed as follows in para. 8 of his judgment :the first point of importance would be regarding whether laxminarayan was rightly held to be served. the .....

Abdul Hakim Quraishi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC448; 1961CriLJ573; [1961]2SCR610

..... conditions at the time, should all enter into the judicial verdict.' another consideration which has to be kept in mind is that 'the legislature is the best judge of what is good for the community, by whose suffrage it comes into existence............' (see the state of bihar v. maharajadhiraja sir kameshwar singh of darbhanga ..... and bullocks infringes the fundamental right of the petitioners and is to that extent void. (3) now, we come to the madhya pradesh act. several provisions of this act have been challenged before us as imposing unreasonable restrictions on the fundamental right of the petitioners. section 4 deals with prohibition of slaughter of agricultural ..... [1959]1scr629 an ordinance was passed called the uttar pradesh prevention of cow slaughter (amendment) ordinance, 1958. this ordinance was later repealed and replaced by the act. the petitioners say that in the bill as originally drafted the age limit below which slaughter was not permissible was put at 15 years; but the select .....

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the General Manager, Park Town, Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1961Mad486; [1961(3)FLR35]; (1961)ILLJ615Mad; (1961)2MLJ273

..... in i. m. lall's case, 75 ind app 225 : (air 1948 pc 121), without a consideration of the provisions of the civil procedure code relevant to the inquiry and without a consideration of the reasoning of the federal court in tarachand pandit's case, air 1947 fc 23, cannot be treated, particularly because the matter ..... illegal order of dismissal contravening the provisions of the constitution. we are therefore of opinion that the suit claim is well founded and that the learned subordinate judge was right in granting a decree in favour of the plaintiff as prayed for.29. learned counsel for the appellant contended that the order of reinstatement ..... to contractual rights; rodwell v. thomas, 1944 kb596. no remedy exists where an officer appointed under statutory, authority loses his office through its premature termination by act of parliament without compensation, since the agreement has become impossible of performance; reilly v. r, 1934 ac 176. members of the armed forces cannot sue for arrears .....

The State of Bihar Vs. Rani Sonabati Kumari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC221; [1961]1SCR728

..... point remaining for consideration is as to whether the publication of the notification under s. 3(1) which was treated by the subordinate judge to be the disobedience, has been established to be 'the act' of the state. the entirety of the argument on this part of the case was rested on the terms of art. 154(1 ..... to within the prohibition. the same argument was addressed to the high court and was repelled by the learned judges and in our opinion correctly. in the first place, the only 'notification' contemplated by the provision of the act immediately relevant to the suit, was a notification under s. 3(1). such a notification has the statutory ..... ghatwali estate of handwa situated within the state, instituted against the state bihar, in the court of the subordinate judge, dumka, on the 20th november, 1950, title suit 40 of 1950 inter alia for a declaration that the act was ultra vires of the bihar legislature and was therefore 'illegal, void, unconstitutional and inoperative' and that the .....

Balaram Abaji Patil and ors. Vs. M.C. Ragojiwalla and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1961Bom59; 1961BomCR(Cri)59; (1960)62BOMLR807; ILR1960Bom816; (1960)IILLJ491Bom

..... employer before us, laid particular stress on a certain passage occurring in the judgment of bose, j. after referring to the definition of 'wages', the learned judge observed:-'now the question is whether the kind of bonus contemplated by this definition must be a bonus that is payable as a clause of the contract of ..... wages earned by the employee which remained unpaid during his life time. if we were to agree with mr. pliadke that the authority under the minimum wages act has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain claims for the recovery of minimum wages, the heirs of a deceased employee would be left without any remedy whatsoever; they ..... one of which was refected and the other accepted by the learned authority. the learned authority rejected the employers' contention that the authority under the minimum wages act has exclusive jurisdiction to issue directions to an employer for the payment of the difference between minimum wages and the amounts actually paid. the learned authority held that .....

Amir Chand Tota Ram, Delhi Vs. Smt. Sucheta Kripalani, Delhi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H383

..... . to what extent such relation may be sufficient to fix the candidate must, it seems to me, be a question of degree and of evidence to be judged of by the election petition tribunal.'both these cases were followed in mathai mathew manjuran v. k.c. abraham, 10 elr 376 (403). the question of agency ..... as 11 and 12 and are reproduced below :'11. whether the fact of asking manmohinisehgal to retire from the contest under section 55aof the r. p. act by shri jawahar lal nehru, primeminister of india when shrimati manmohini sehgalwas no longer a member o the congress partydoes not amount to a corrupt practice namely undueinfluence ..... raised is whether the election tribunal was justified in refusing permission to amend the particulars under section 90, subsection (5) of the representation of the people act, even though the allegation of corrupt practice finds place in the election petition and there is application seeking permission to amend particulars before the election tribunal.the division .....

Ajit Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1961Raj139; 1961CriLJ853

..... some state legislations prescribing special procedure for cases triable by session court dispensing with committal proceedings.under the amended law there are prescribed different procedures for inquiries in cases instituted on police report and in cases on private complaints and there are fundamental points of distinction in the two procedures. in this ..... trial without examining all the eyewitnesses. reliance was placed on ghisa v. state, air 1959 raj 294 : (ilr (1959) 9 raj 944). the learned judge rejected the petitioner's application. the petitioner has, therefore, filed the present revision application.3. the learned government advocate in opposing the revision contended that the decision ..... and the accused is not at all concerned with it. dealing with the second object, it should be remembered that under the law as amended by act xxvi of 1955, the accused is supplied copies of statements of witnesses recorded during investigation under section 161 cr. p. c. in accordance with the .....

The State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Ajodhya Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC773; 1961CriLJ794; [1961]2SCR672

..... rules;' ...............................................................9. paragraph 489 : 'a police officer may be departmentally tried under section 7 of the police act - (1) after he has been tried judicially; (2) after a magisterial inquiry under the criminal procedure code; (3) after a police investigation under the criminal procedure code or a departmental enquiry under paragraph 486 iii ..... proceed with a departmental trial without complying with the provisions of sub-paragraph (1) of para. 486 of the police regulations. the learned judges of the high court held that the respondent was charged with committing cognizable offences and therefore sub-paragraph (1) of para. 486 governed the ..... that he had on nine occasions, particulars of which were given in the charge, accepted bribes. it may be mentioned that the magisterial inquiry related to seven of the nine charges alleged against the respondent. the trial was conducted by the superintendent of police and the respondent submitted .....

The State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Babu Ram Upadhya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC751; 1961CriLJ773; (1970)ILLJ670SC; [1961]2SCR679

..... the rules are mandatory or directory, it would be convenient at this stage to notice broadly the scope and the purpose of the inquiry contemplated by the rules. 33. section 2 of the police act constitutes the police establishment; section 7 empowers specified officers to punish specified subordinate officers who are remiss or negligent in discharge of their ..... a cognizable offence; and it was argued on behalf of the respondent that it amounted to an offence under section 409 of the indian penal code. the learned judges accepted the contention of the respondent. even so, it is said that whatever might have been contentions of the parties, the information given by tika ram to ..... the operation of art. 310. the said words refer, inter alia, to arts. 124, 148, 218 and 324 which provide that the judges of the supreme court, the auditor general, the judges of the high courts and the chief election commissioner shall not be removed from their offices except in the manner laid down in those articles. .....

Shelton Vs. Tucker

Court : US Supreme Court

..... teachers to disclose every single organization with which he has page 364 u. s. 488 been associated over a five-year period. the scope of the inquiry required by act 10 is completely unlimited. the statute requires a teacher to reveal the church to which he belongs, or to which he has given financial support. it ..... consider that arkansas had the right to pass the statute in question, and therefore conceive it my duty to dissent. the legal framework in which the issue must be judged is clear. the rights of free speech and association embodied in the "liberty" assured against state action by the fourteenth amendment ( see de jonge v. oregon, ..... to which such individual rights must yield. when the action complained of pertains to the realm of investigation, our inquiry has a double aspect: first, whether the investigation relates to a legitimate governmental purpose; second, whether, judged in the light of that purpose, the questioned page 364 u. s. 498 action has substantial relevance thereto. .....