Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1960 Page 15 of about 434 results (0.429 seconds)

Regional Transport Authority and anr. Vs. Sri Kashi Prasad Gupta and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1962All551

..... and (2) mahabir prasad shall get compensation for the premature cancellation of the aforesaid permits.' 12. it is contended by the appellants that the learned judge was wrong in holding that as neither of theschemes made provision for the offer of alternative routesto the displaced operators the regional transport authoritylaid no jurisdiction to ..... bythe state government, that it was the governor who prepared and caused the proposed scheme to be published, andthat as this was contrary to the act the notification andall subsequent orders and decisions based thereon are invalid.24. 'state transport undertaking' means any undertaking providing a road transport service where such ..... an extraneous or irrelevant consideration. this being the sole grievance of kashi prasad gupta against the grant of permits to the three displaced operators, the act gives him no right to object.76. learned counsel for gupta contended that his client does not object to lawful competition, but government, by granting .....

Govind Natha Vs. the State

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1961Guj11; 1961CriLJ57; (1961)0GLR168

..... to by witnesses mohanlal and meghji, examined on behalf of the prosecution. this part of their test-mony has not been accepted by the learned judge, then, according to the prosecution, certain acts were committed by the appellant as a result of which punja died on the spot. this part of the prosecution case is disputed by the ..... the pistol and that pistol and the live cartridges were attached as a result of the production before the p. s. i. at bhuj. the learned sessions judge felt convinced that prosecution had. established both these points and he held it proved that the appellant was responsible for the murder of punja. though the two prosecution ..... , i, indian penal code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and for the offence under section 21, indian arms act, and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months. the learned judge has ordered both the sentences to run concurrently.2. the first charge against the appellant was that, on or about 3-10-1959 .....

Locomotive Engineers Vs. Missouri-kansas-texas R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the merits of a "minor dispute," the resolution of which is committed by the railway labor act, 3(i), 48 stat. 1189, 45 u.s.c. 153, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the adjustment board. the question of a district judge's jurisdiction to impose this type of condition upon an injunction issued to preserve the adjustment board ..... the frequently long delayed board decision, it might well be impossible to make them whole in any realistic sense. if this be so, the action of the district judge, rather than defeating the board's jurisdiction, would operate to preserve that jurisdiction by preventing injury so irreparable that a decision of the board in the union's ..... although respondents maintain that there has been such an abuse in this case, scrutiny of the record does not persuade us that the evidence was insufficient to support the judge's action. the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart, while agreeing with the court that the district court .....

Ward Vs. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the jury in determining whether the petitioner was an "employee" of the railroad during the performance of the work within the meaning of the act. the instructions given in effect limited inquiry to the question whether the petitioner was aware that the railroad considered him not to be working for it, but for some third page ..... load watermelons out there on that track, and he always repaired it every year before watermelon time." however, we agree with the petitioner's alternative contention that the trial judge erred in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the petitioner, [ footnote 1 ] and in giving the page 362 u. s. 399 instructions he did, [ ..... contention. indeed, we do not think that the proofs presented a jury question whether the turpentine company was the railroad's "agent" within the meaning of the act. this was not a situation, as in sinkler, in which the railroad engaged an independent contractor to perform operational activities required to carry out the franchise. this .....

Kashibai and anr. Vs. the ScIndia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1961Bom200; (1960)62BOMLR1017

..... side, the contention raised by mr. rangnekar on behalf of the plaintiffs that the suit fell under the fatal accidents act and that', therefore, the city civil court had jurisdiction to entertain it, cannot be sustained. the learned principal judge, therefore, was, in my opinion, perfectly right in holding that the suit did not fall within the jurisdiction of ..... it. on behalf of the plaintiffs, however, it was contended that the suit was filed under the fatal accidents act and that, therefore, it did not fall within the admiralty jurisdiction of the high court. the learned principal judge did not agree with the contention of the plaintiffs and held that in spite of the fact that the claim ..... to the proper court. the present appeal is directed against that order of the learned principal judge.2. it is true that until 1911 it was held in england that 'damage done by a ship' referred to in section 7 of the act of 1861 did not include an injury resulting in the death of any person and accordingly, .....

Governor-general of India in Council Representing the Great Indian Pen ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1961All14

..... defendant' was negligent and that his negligence caused or materially contributed to the accident. negligence is an effective cause of any injury which either is intended or, judged broadly and on common sense principles, is a direct consequence. when negligence has been established, liability follows' for all the consequences which are in fact the direct ..... been so caused, and shall be brought by and in the name of the executor, administrator, or representative of the person deceased; ............' section 2 of the act states:-'provided always that not more than one action or suit shall be brought for, and m respect of, the same subject-matter of complaint ..........'section 3 runs ..... the railway staff. being tara chand's widow, the plaintiff is entitled to get compensation from the railway administration for causing -her husband's death by a negligent act. the plaintiff estimated the amount of compensation at rs. 1,59,600/-. the relief claimed in the plaint was a sum ofrs. 100,000.3. the .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm Ram Gopal Hukum Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All672

..... that the supreme court should not make any pronouncement on any question which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the particular case before it.thus the judges of the supreme court arc, if i may say so again with profound respect, conscious that any pronouncement of law by the court acquires 'potency' under ..... for examp]e, may do things for another without incurring any contractual obligation. the word 'agency'' in the dictionary has a wider import than under the contract act. the question is whether the supreme court used the word 'agent'' in the sense of any contractual relationship or only to indicate that the money is collected ..... any manner liable for the loss of the packet or its contents. nevertheless, subject to certain rules, and within certain limits, the postmaster-general voluntarily and as an act of grace pays compensation, according to a published scale, for loss of, or damage to, registered packets, parcels, and express packets, and certain insured imperial and .....

Rishabhkumar Vs. K.C. Sharma and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP329

..... the accused. if those facts did afford reasonable and probable cause, then the prosecution would be justified and it would not as a rule be necessary for an inquiry to be made into the prosecutor's belief. the state of belief of the prosecutor goes to malice, but not as a rule to reasonable and probable cause ..... was with reasonable and probablecause and with the intention of carrying the lawinto effect and not with any malicious intention.on this finding the decision of the additionaldistrict judge was set aside and the judgment ofthe trial court dismissing the plaintiff's suit wasrestored.5. there is no dispute that the criminal proceedings which were initiated ..... take any action, approved the filing of criminal complaint against the culprits; and that in doing so he acted bona fide and in the interest of the municipal committee. the other defendant also raised a similar plea.4. the civil judge, class ii, khurai, who tried the suit found that the prosecution of the appellant was not without .....

The State of Bombay Vs. S.L. Apte and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC578; (1961)63BOMLR491; 1961CriLJ725; [1961]3SCR107

..... such property improperly withheld or wilfully misapplied' was a 'punishment' within either art. 20(2) of the constitution or s. 26 of the general clauses act. the learned judges of the high court rejected this contention. though learned counsel for the appellant originally submitted that he was contesting this conclusion of the high court, he did ..... s. 403(1) of the criminal procedure code, by reason of their previous conviction by the magistrate for the same offence under the insurance act and their acquittal in respect thereof by the sessions judge, pleading in addition that when the conviction by the magistrate stood, they had even undergone a portion of the sentence imposed. the ..... indian penal code set aside their conviction under s. 105 of the indian insurance act. the reason for the latter order was the finding of the learned sessions judge that the sanction required by s. 107 of the indian insurance act which was a pre-requisite for the initiation of the prosecution under s. 105 had .....

Bhanwarlal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1961CriLJ561

..... of his case at all and based his findings on the evidence recorded in the other case i.e., of laxmansingh. he has pointed out that the learned judge's observations that none of the prosecution witnesses were cross-examined was not correct in his case.this criticism appears to be true and therefore instead of sending ..... cause injury, but without the intention to cause injury, or knowledge that it will probably be caused. the criminality lies in running the risk of doing such an act with recklessness or indifference as to the consequences. criminal negligence is the gross and culpable neglect or failure to exercise that reasonable and proper care to guard against ..... establishing the guilt of the accused under section 304a. in the case of in re, nidamarti nagabhushanam, 7 mad hc 119 holloway, j., said:culpable rashness is acting with the consciousness that the mischievous and illegal consequences may follow, but with the hope that they will not and often with the belief that the actor has taken .....