Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1967 Page 15 of about 665 results (0.319 seconds)

The State Vs. Kali Charan

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All65; 1968CriLJ225

..... rule 3, c. p. c.2. the court further observed that kali charan appeared to have committed perjury and it was in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into the offence which appeared to have been committed by him under section 193 ipc. but the court considered it fair that a notice should issue ..... complaint should not be filed against him for perjury. the facts are these. he filed a second appeal in this court from the decree of the civil and sessions judge, agra, reversing that of the munsif, agra, and dismissing his suit for the ejectment of the respondents. during the hearing of the appeal the respondents filed an application ..... learned counsel stated that on such occasions the advice of counsel is sometimes decisive, and had kali charan been given the advice which he should have be might have acted differently4. i have given this matter my anxious consideration on the one hand, this court thinks that periury of a very reprehensible nature appears to have been committed .....

Sita Ram Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All207; 1968CriLJ721

..... with the sanction of the state government and the offence alleged to have been committed by him had been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty. the learned single judge-allowed this plea to be raised for the first time at the stage of revision because it affects the question of jurisdiction.2 ..... an act; nor does a government medical officer act or purport to act as a public servant in picking the pocket of a patient whom he is examining, though ..... gill v. the king, that-'a public servant can only be said to act or to purport to act in the discharge of his official duty, if his act is such as to he within the scope of his official duty thus a judge neither acts nor purports to act as a judge in receiving a bribe, though the judgment which he delivers may be such .....

Jagir Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC43; 1968CriLJ89; (1968)70PLR201; [1967]3SCR256

..... , the appellants, about whose identity there is no manner of doubt whatsoever, cannot escape the consequences of the act of all the six persons merely because in the case of three of those who have been acquitted the learned judge has not been satisfied as to their identity and the fourth he has acquitted on a consideration that as no ..... corroboration is available as to him of the witnesses he may be given the benefit of doubt. the matter might have been different if the learned judge had disbelieved the witnesses with regard to those four persons, but this he has not done.' 4. the charge against the six accused including the two appellants was ..... bombay : 1960crilj424 , 12 named persons including the two appellants were charged with offences under s. 302 read with sections 149 and 34 of the indian penal code. the sessions judge acquitted seven of the accused but convicted five under s. 302 read with s. 149 and s. 302 read with s. 34. on appeal, the high court acquitted one .....

Narayanprasad Haribhai Majmudar and anr. Vs. Merubhai Rayabhai and anr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1967)8GLR897

..... 71. section 71, argued the petitioners, was mandatory in its terms and it provided clearly and specifically that, save as expressly provided by the tenancy act, all inquiries and other proceedings before the mamlatdar or the tribunal shall be commenced by an application which shall contain the particulars set out in the section. the petitioners ..... 71. this contention is unsustainable and must be rejected. section 71 undoubtedly requires that save as expressly provided by or under the tenancy act all inquiries and other proceedings before the agricultural lands tribunal shall be commenced by an application and, therefore, unless there is some express provision to the contrary, ..... dahyabhai v. the gujarat revenue tribunal civil appeal no. 365 of 1966, to which i have already referred, confirmed the view taken by the learned judge. dealing with the argument of the appellant that the agricultural lands tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with the question whether the appellant was or was not .....

Ambika Tobacco Company, Gondia Vs. Labour Court, Nagpur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1968)70BOMLR159; [1968(17)FLR105]; (1968)IILLJ353Bom; 1968MhLJ10

..... elaborate procedure of sub-section (2) ... but the anti thesis between 'money due' and a 'benefit which must be computed in terms of money' still remains, for the inquiry being made is not of the kind contemplated by sub-section (2) but is one for the satisfaction of the state government under sub-section (1). it is verification of ..... are not 'money due'. for instance, loss of the benefit of free quarters is not loss of 'money due' though such loss can be reckoned in terms of money by inquiry and equation. the contrast between 'money due' on the one hand and a 'benefit' which is not 'money due' but which can become so after the money equivalent ..... a labour court at nagpur for adjudication of industrial disputes relating to matters specified is sch. ii to the said act and for performing such other junctions as may be assigned to it under the act; and (2) appoint sri p. d. kulkarni, judge, district industrial court, nagpur, as the presiding officer thereof. (by order and in the name of the .....

Navinchandra Babulal Bhavsar Vs. Bachubhai Dhanabhai Shah

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1969Guj124; (1968)GLR409

..... .union of india : (1961)illj339sc .* * * * *we have preferred to quote extensively from the above decision as in our view, the submission of the learned acting advocate general that the principles decided in that case should govern the present case is correct and it will be proper to see whether, having regard to these principles, it ..... the court in all suits cognizable by it except where such procedure is inconsistent with the procedure prescribed by any specific provisions of the presidency small came courts act, 1882, or with these rules.' the schedule provided by the said rules includes the application of the summary procedure of order xxxvii, civil procedure code, but has deleted ..... reason to do so and, with respect, adopt the reasoning and conclusion reached by the learned judge to be correct.27. an effort was made on behalf of the applicant to rely on the decisions in respect of the inquiry under article 311(2) of the constitution wherein it had been held that even in an administrative .....

Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha Vs. Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1494; 1968(16)BLJR1; 1967CriLJ1380a; [1967]3SCR163

..... of court of a kind not punishable by the court of the commissioner itself (appointed to hold an inquiry under public servants inquiries act, 1850) and that for the purpose of the contempt of courts act the word 'subordinate' would include all courts and tribunals over which high court is given the power ..... . in brajanandan sinha v. jyoti narain(1) the question was, whether a commissioner appointed under the public servants (inquiries) act, 1850 was a court within the meaning of the contempt of courts act, 1952. there, after referring to authorities like coke on littleton and stroud and stephen, the privy council decision in ..... of superintendence under art. 227 of the constitution. ' in lakhama pesha v. venkatrao swamirao a.i.r. 1951 pun 49 the question was, whether the chief judge of the court of small causes acting .....

Klopfer Vs. North Carolina

Court : US Supreme Court

..... with admirable promptness during the march, 1964, special criminal session of the superior court of orange county; but, when the jury failed to reach a verdict, the trial judge declared a mistrial and ordered the case continued for the term. several weeks prior to the april, 1965, criminal session of the superior court, the state's solicitor ..... during the session, petitioner, through his attorney, opposed the entry of such an order in open court. the trespass charge, he contended, was abated by the civil rights act of 1964 as construed in hamm v. city of rock hill, 379 u. s. 306 (1964). in spite of petitioner's opposition, the court indicated that it would ..... subject to prosecution at any time in the future at the discretion of the prosecutor. although petitioner objected that the trespass charge was abated by the civil rights act of 1964 and that entry of the nolle prosequi order would violate his federal right to a speedy trial, the trial court, without stated justification, granted the .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab. Vs. Mothu Ram Prem Chand.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1967]66ITR638(P& H)

..... of a hindu family hitherto assessed as undivided that a partition has taken place among the members of such family, the income-tax officer shall make such inquiry thereinto as he may think fit, and, if he is satisfied that the joint family property has been partitioned among the various members or groups of members ..... in the following terms :'28 (1) if the income-tax officer, the appellate assistant commissioner or the appellate tribunal, in the course of any proceedings under this act, is satisfied that any person - ...(c) has concealed the particulars of his income or deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, he or it may direct that ..... assessee claimed disruption of the hindus undivided family and filed an application, dated march 13, 1957, praying for an order being passed under section 25a of the act accepting the partition of the hindu undivided family with effect from march 31, 1956. the application was accompanied by a copy of the registered partition deed, dated .....

Najarkhan Kalubava and anr. Vs. Kesarkhan Kayamkhan and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1968)9GLR1066

..... the trial courts' decree in favour of the plaintiff for possession of the suit lands. it only varied the said decree as regards quantum of mesne profits by directing an inquiry under order 20 rule 12(1)(c). defendants 1 and 2 have therefore filed the present appeal.3. at the hearing miss shah raised the following points:(1) hat ..... no. 1, which would show that defendants 2 and 3 were representing that defendant no. 1 was the ostensible owner.9. it is, therefore, clear that the least inquiry on the part of the plaintiff would have disclosed the real fact that defendant no. 1 was neither the ostensible owner nor had he any authority to ..... claim. in those circumstances it was held that in allowing the suit to be withdrawn on this ground the court had acted without jurisdiction and the order could be reversed under section 115 of the civil procedure code, because the learned judge bad exercised jurisdiction which did not vest in him under order 23 rule 1(2). on the same reasoning, miss shah .....