Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1967 Page 11 of about 665 results (0.512 seconds)

Curtis Pub. Co. Vs. Butts

Court : US Supreme Court

..... true are detailed at length in the opinion of mr. justice harlan. suffice it to say that little investigative effort was expended initially, and no additional inquiries were made even after the editors were notified by respondent and his daughter that the account page 388 u. s. 170 to be published was absolutely ..... the punitive damage award, the majority upheld it as stemming from the "enlightened conscience" of the jury as adjusted by the lawful action of the trial judge. it was in "complete accord" with the trial court's determination that the evidence justified the finding "that what the post did was done with reckless ..... justice fortas). [ footnote 2/4 ] ga.code ann. 105-709(6) provides: "privileged communications. -- the following are deemed privileged communications: " " * * * *" "6. comments upon the acts of public men in their public capacity and with reference thereto." this privilege is qualified by ga.code ann. 105-710, which provides: "malicious use of privilege. -- in every case .....

Girija Bai Vs. A. Thakur Das and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1967Kant217; AIR1967Mys217; ILR1967KAR1128; (1967)2MysLJ49

..... for h derision, in the first inslance, by the trial court in the order of this court in c. r. p. 7 of 1964. after hearing the parties the learned judge passed an order which has already been extracted4. in support of the revision petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner. sri k r karanth strongly relies upon the terms used ..... no. 7 of 1964 and this court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the trial court on i. a. no. ix and directed the district judge to take up for consideration the question whether the 7th defendant can he permitted to prosecute any part of her defence without payment of court-fee as a pauper in ..... reference made under sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mysore high court act, 1961. when this matter came up for hearing before his lordship justice kalagate.2. this revision petition is directed against the order, dated 25th march. 1965, made by the first additional civil judge bangalore city, in original suit no. 12 of 1964. it purports to he an .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal Vs. K. K. Roy.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1967]66ITR179(Cal)

..... his employment. it is no doubt true that, subsequently, the assessee came to be employed by the nationalised airlines corporation but that would not be any material for judging the issue before us because what was in the mind of the board of directors on january 30, 1953, when they passed resolution granting the sum of rs. ..... regarding continuance of service. the assessee was the managing director of airways (india) ltd. during the mateiral time. he had no right, under section 20(1) of the act, to continue in service and this argument of me. pal must therefore, fail. mr. pal contended, in the laternative, that the assessee got an eployment under the ..... of the statutory corporation, in which the undertaking of the employer company had vested, under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 20 of the air corporations act. as such, he submitted, no question of payment of conpensation for loss of eployment arose in the case of the assessee, because the employment continues. this agument may .....

Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and declined to decide, pending the outcome of greyhound's 60-day offer, the questions of control under 5 of the interstate commerce act or anticompetitive effect under 7 of the clayton act. a three-judge district court sustained the icc order. held: 1. the icc is required, as a general rule, under its duty to determine ..... 5. section 5 not only deals explicitly with problems of control, but it establishes the public interest criteria which the icc is bound to use in making that type of inquiry. for example, the commission must consider "(1) the effect of the proposed transaction upon adequate transportation service to the public; . . . (3) the total fixed ..... period, and because no prejudice to any party's interests could result from the delay. ii we do not agree that congress limited icc consideration under 20a to an inquiry into fiscal manipulation. [ footnote 4 ] even if congress' primary concern was to prevent such manipulation, the broad terms "public interest" and "lawful object" negate .....

Sahela Ram Son of Ch. Dhan Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through Secy. to ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H127

..... shock a reasonable mind.' if one of the grounds of interference by this court in such a decision, as is the opinion of the learned judges, is to scrutinise whether the act or acts done by the member of the municipal committee in disregard of his duty are such as can shock a reasonable mind, such scrutiny can only ..... two charges proved against the delinquent government servant, but the orissa high court found that out of five heads under one charge, two could not be sustained, the inquiry tribunal having already found one other of those five heads as not established, and it proceeded to quash the order made against the government servant with a direction ..... will at its best be a reasonable and at its worst be at least a plausible one. the public should not be deprived of this only safeguard....a judge is trained to look at things objectively, uninfluenced by considerations of policy or expediency; but, anexecutive officer generally looks at thingsfrom the stand-point of policy and expediency .....

R.G. Anand Vs. Delux Films and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT321

..... these authorities, most of which were cited in argument, without going through them at greater length than is convenient to do here and comparing the language of different judges. each case deals with peculiar circumstances, and the endeavor of the court in each was rather to apply the statutory provisions to the case in hand than to ..... bombay, in which it is laid down that a reprint or selected passage from a noncopyright work may bean 'original literary work' within the meaning of the copyright act, 1911 and the subject of copyright there under. the head ntoe which gives us a clear clue to the decision is in the following terms :'theappellants published in ..... of which the present appeal arises was instituted by r. g. anand plaintiff-appellant in september, 1956. in the plaint, 18 points were stated to bring out the act of piracy committed by the defendants by infringing the plaintiff's copyright in the play 'hum hindustani.' the defendants had in fact adopted the plaintiff's play as the .....

Boutilier Vs. Ins

Court : US Supreme Court

..... have already quoted from clinical experts to show what a wide range the term "psychopathic personality" has. another expert [ footnote 4 ] classifies such a person under three headings: acting: (1) inability to withstand tedium, (2) lack of a sense of responsibility, (3) a tendency to "blow up" under pressure, (4) maladjustment to law and ..... the purely legal question of whether the term "psychopathic personality" included homosexuals and if it suffered illegality because of vagueness. ii the legislative history of the act indicates beyond a shadow of a doubt that the congress intended the phrase "psychopathic personality" to include homosexuals such as petitioner. page 387 u. s ..... petitioner's appeal from the page 387 u. s. 119 finding of the special inquiry officer was dismissed by the board of immigration appeals, without opinion, and his petition for review in the court of appeals was dismissed, with one judge dissenting. 363 f.2d 488. it held that the term "psychopathic personality," as .....

Moody Vs. Flowers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 28 u.s.c. 2281. the answer to that question in turn depends upon whether the three-judge courts in these cases were properly convened. in no. 624, appellants attack the validity of an alabama statute (ala.laws 1957, act no. 9, p. 30) prescribing the apportionment and districting scheme for electing members of the houston ..... the suffolk county board of supervisors violates the fourteenth amendment and an injunction prohibiting the appellants from acting as a board of supervisors unless and until a change in their voting strength is made, and requesting the convening of a three-judge court. the 10 towns of suffolk county, new york, elect, by popular vote, a ..... a county charter. since the "statute" in each of these cases is one of limited application, concerning only a particular county involved in the litigation, a three-judge court was improperly convened. appeals should, therefore, have been taken to the respective courts of appeals, not to this court. since the time for perfecting those .....

Gardner Vs. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... mercy of counsel's ability to marshall and deploy horrible examples which logic may accommodate, but the reality of administration would repel. our training as lawyers and judges, our respect for the administrative process, and our awareness of the complexities of life should warn us not to fall into the trap of abstract, generalized, ..... and destructive in its implications as illustrated by the present application. as will appear, i believe that this approach improperly and unwisely gives individual federal district judges a roving commission to halt the regulatory process, and to do so on the basis of abstractions and generalities instead of concrete fact situations, and that ..... in ewing, 339 u.s. at 339 u. s. 599 , a case under the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, the court held "it is not a requirement of due process that there be judicial inquiry before discretion can be exercised. it is sufficient, where only property rights are concerned, that there is at some stage an .....

In Re Gault

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not merely technical or historical, but, like the hearsay rule, have a sound basis in human experience, they should not be rejected in any judicial inquiry. juvenile court judges in los angeles, tucson, and wisconsin rapids, wisconsin report that they are satisfied with the operation of their courts despite application of unrelaxed rules of evidence ..... children's bureau pub. no. 437-1966, p. 47 (hereinafter cited as standards); new york family court act 721 (1963) (hereinafter cited as n.y.family court act). the court also held that the judge may consider hearsay if it is "of a kind on which reasonable men are accustomed to rely in serious affairs ..... 's protection, and not with his punishment. i do not question that the methods employed in such cases must be consistent with the constitutional obligation to act in accordance with due process, but certainly the fourteenth amendment does not demand that they be constricted by the procedural guarantees devised for ordinary criminal prosecutions. .....