Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1960 Page 30 of about 434 results (0.310 seconds)

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... up for consideration before a bench of this court in the case reported in air 1958 mys 184. a notification was issued appointing joint judges and assistant judges to decide election cases under the bombay district municipal act. on the reorganisation of states, belgaum district became part of mysore. the question arose whether the notification issued tinder the provisions of section 22 (2 ..... ) of the district municipal act by the government of bombay had still any force on the reorganisation of the states and would apply to the part .....

Firoz MeharuddIn Vs. Sub-divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP110; 1961CriLJ516

..... commencement of the constitution but it means he has migrated when the question of his migration comes to be considered.another reason given by the learned judge for taking the view that 'migration' in article 7 has a wider connotation and is not confined to migration upto the date of commencement of ..... ensures continuance of citizenship and contemplates a law by parliament for terminating existing citizenship. the relevant law has been enacted in 1955 called the citizenship act and according to that act citizenship can be terminated on acquisition of citizenship of another country only. another mode of terminating citizenship, albeit by a fiction, would seem ..... constitution and had gone to pakistan after the constitution but had returned before the amendment came into force. it is further urged that under the citizenship act, 1955, the question whether the citizenship of such of the petitioners, who were indian citizens at the commencement of the constitution, had terminated is a .....

Damodar Sharma and anr. Vs. Nandram Deviram

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP345

..... pretext, circumvent the law and frustrate its object.legislative judgment of the representatives of the people in imposing these restrictions should be presumed to be reasonable. they are the best judges of the needs of the time. their wisdom is not under scrutiny. whether it was the principle of 'live and let live ', or whether it was the principle of ' ..... was reluctant to agree with the view taken in laduram's case, madh b lj 1954 hcr 226 and babulal's case, second appeal no. 224 of 1951. the learned judge saw no ambiguity in the words 'no other accommodation' and he saw no justification for an abridgment of the plain meaning of those words by interpolating the words ''of his ..... city or town concerned. 4. in ladu ram v. rampal, madh b lj 1954 scr 226, khan j. (now a judge of this court) found an ambiguity in the phrase 'no other accommodation' used in section 4 (g) of the 1950 act and posed a question : 'was it the intention of the legislature to say to such a person; ''well, now you .....

Kalyandas Anantlal Vs. Gangabai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP67

..... taking accounts.while the proceedings before the commissioner for taking of accounts were going on, an appeal against the preliminary decree was filed in the court of the district judge, hoshangabad, which was dismissed. thereafter, a second appeal was filed in the high court against the aforesaid dismissal. while the second appeal in the high court was ..... decision, in my opinion, is hardly relevant for the decision in this case. that was a case where the court had exceeded its pecuniary jurisdiction and consequently had acted without initial jurisdiction in the matter. in that case the plaintiffs had brought a suit against the defendant for rs. 2,000/- as damages resulting frorn cutting of ..... -matter before it but the complaint is that the court which had jurisdiction over the subject-matter, over the parties and over the lis pending before it, has acted in disregard of some provision of law, as for instance against the provisions of order 2.3, rule 3, as in the instant case, it cannot be .....

Huron Portland Cement Co. Vs. City of Detroit

Court : US Supreme Court

..... exercise of even the most traditional concept of what is compendiously known as the police power. in the exercise of that power, the states and their instrumentalities may act, in many areas of interstate commerce and maritime activities, concurrently with the federal government. gibbons v. ogden, 9 wheat. l; cooley v. board of wardens of ..... of the code for violation of the smoke emission provisions. [ footnote 2 ] compare napier v. atlantic coast line r. co., where the court concluded that "the [locomotive] boiler inspection act . . . was intended to occupy the field." 272 u. s. 272 u.s. 605, 272 u. s. 613 . mr. justice douglas, with whom mr. justice frankfurter ..... of interstate trains, and another state required cab curtains during the winter months. the interstate commerce commission, though it had the power to do so under the boiler inspection act, had never required a particular kind of fire door or cab curtain. the court, speaking through mr. justice brandeis, said, at 272 u. s. 612 - .....

Associated Publishers (Madras) Ltd. Vs. K. Bashyam alias 'Arya' and An ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1961Mad114

..... was the second defendant. having regard to the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff and the decree granted by the learned trial judge, it becomes irrelevant whether the remedies under sections 6 and 7 of the copyright act are cumulative, or alternative remedies. the house of lords in caxton publishing co v. sutherland publishing co, 1939 a.c ..... plea of the appellant was based on the provisions of section 8 of the copyright act. though this section was expressly mentioned in the written statement, the learned judge, balakrishna aiyar j. found that a plea under section 8 of the copyright act was not specifically taken in the written statement. he pointed out that even no ..... specific issue was taken on the plea. the learned judge, however, was prepared to hold that the plea, .....

Associated Publishers (Madras), Ltd. Vs. K. Bashyam alias 'Arya' and A ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1962)1MLJ258

..... it was the second defendant. having regard to the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff and the decree granted by the learned trial judge, it becomes irrelevant whether the remedies under sections 6 and 7 of the copyright act are cumulative, or alternative remedies. the house of lords in caxton publishing co. v. sutherland publishing co. l.r. ( ..... of the appellant was based on the provisions of section 8 of the copyright act. though this section was expressly mentioned in the written statement, the learned judge, balakrishna ayyar, j., found that a plea under section 8 of the copyright act was not specifically taken in the written statement. he pointed out that even no ..... specific issue was taken on the plea. the learned judge, however, was prepared to hold that the plea, .....

Mahadeolal Kanodia Vs. the Administrator-general of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC936; [1960]3SCR578

..... basis of judicial procedure. if one thing is more necessary in law than any other thing, it is the quality of certainty. that quality would totally disappear if judges of co-ordinate jurisdiction in a high court start overruling one another's decisions. if one division bench of a high court is unable to distinguish a previous decision ..... court. 4. the learned judges of the high court who heard the appeal agreed with the courts below on a construction of s. 1(2) of the amendment act that s. 28 was not applicable to the proceedings commenced by the tenant by his application for relief and ..... become effective. the learned munsif held that s. 28 of the act being no longer in force he had no power to give the tenant any relief in accordance with the provisions thereof. in that view he dismissed the application. the tenant's appeal to the district judge, howrah, having been rejected, he preferred a second appeal to the high .....

Baba Khalil Ahamad Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All715; 1960CriLJ1528

..... of his books suffer from other defects, he may institute separate proceedings, if so advised. this special bench constituted under section 99c, cr. p. c. has to confine its inquiry within limits of section 99d cr. p- g.11. in the same connection it was urged for the applicant that, sees. 99-a, 99-b and 99-d, cr ..... of section 295a, i.p.c. in 'kali charan sharma v. emperor' : air1927all649 it was held that, the intention of the writer of a book must he judged primarily by the language of the book itself, though it is permissible to receive and consider external evidence either to prove or to rebut the meaning ascribed to it. if ..... risk. provocation received from supporters of the opposite view cannot be treated as a lawful excuse for writing the offensive books. the applicant was guilty of committing the injurious act without a lawful excuse. he knew the probable result of the writing. malice, is, therefore, established.33. all the elements necessary for establishing a charge under section 295a .....

The State of Bombay Vs. Dr. Raghunath Balkrishna Chandrachud

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR442

..... limits of his commission and were done by him as the servant of the crown so as to be, as they are some times shortly termed, acts of state.58. the learned trial judge, however, as stated above proceeded to consider the point as though it was only a point of law which could be decided without reference to pleadings ..... the inhabitants and has elected or agreed to be bound by them that the consideration of the existence, nature, or extent of these rights becomes a relevant subject for inquiry.76. almost the entire case law on the subject was reviewed by their lordships of the supreme court in their recent decision reported in the state of saurashtra v. ..... said order was also challenged on the ground that it had contravened the rules of natural justice in that it had been passed without hearing the plaintiff and without due inquiry. plaintiff further stated that the hazur order dated february 8, 1948, passed by his highness the gaekwar of baroda being a valid and lawful order was binding upon .....