Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1960 Page 25 of about 434 results (0.254 seconds)

Feb 24 1960 (HC)

Rana Pratap Singh Vs. the Vice Chancellor, Benares Hindu University, V ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-24-1960

Reported in : AIR1960All579

..... the interests of discipline. under the rules the chief proctor is responsible for the maintenance of discipline and he has also the authority to hold inquiries. both he and the inquiry committee were thus authorities which had jurisdiction in the matter. there is no reason to hold that they did not discharge their duty honestly and dispassionately ..... the active participation in it of the petitioner.12. a grievance was also made that the academic council though it had before it the report of the inquiry committee and also of the proctor when it decided the action against the students, didnot give an opportunity to the petitioner and others similarly placed to offer ..... to the resolution. this happened on 15-4-1959. (see air 1960 all 256). the conclusion to which the learned judge came was that the academic council alone was under the banaras hindu university act and the statutes and ordinances, competent to mete out the punishment and that the standing committee which did so was not authorised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1960 (HC)

Sri Calcutta Singh Vs. Registrar, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1960

Reported in : AIR1960All531

..... norfolk, (1949) 1 all er 109 at p. 118:'the requirements of natural justice must depend on the circumstances of the case, the nature of inquiry, the rules under which the tribunal is acting, the subject-matter that is being dealt with and so forth.'7. the same principle was laid down by the supreme court in nagendra nath v. ..... had nowhere been laid down that the opportunity of hearing should be given by the punishing authority itself. that decision did not therefore support the view which the learned judge was taking.12. in air 1958 all 792 (supra) while the petitioner was sitting for an examination the inviliga-tor found in has possession a chit of paper ..... of mr. justice mathur by which he dismissed a petition filed by the appellant under article 226 of the constitution.2. the facts as have been found by the learned judge (and no attempt was made before us to challenge those findings) are that the appellant was a student studying for m. sc. (technical) previous examination of the banaras .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1960 (FN)

Labor Board Vs. Deena Artware, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-23-1960

..... . 343. we do not intimate an opinion on the merits of this alternative theory of liability. the authorities we have cited merely indicate the range of inquiry which the petition of the board presented. discovery is useful in determining what the facts are. it is, indeed, necessary to determine whether the decree of ..... proceeded on the assumption that discovery would reveal facts requiring payment of artware's backpay debt by the companies affiliated with it. discovery was denied (one judge dissenting). 251 f.2d 183. the court's ground for denying discovery was, surprisingly enough, that the board should first test the legal sufficiency of a ..... the employer's conduct constituted an unfair labor practice. the separation of that finding from the determination of amounts being an eminently reasonable method for administering the act, it is irrelevant that as yet undetermined matters subsequent to the discriminatory discharge may, in fact, disentitle some or all of the employees to receive payment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1960 (FN)

United States Vs. Mersky

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-23-1960

..... s. 141 , 284 u. s. 147 ; united states v. storrs, 272 u. s. 652 , 272 u. s. 654 . as established by these precedents, the focal point of inquiry is not the form page 361 u. s. 442 of the defendant's plea, but the effect of the ruling of the district court. [ footnote 2/1 ] "the material question ..... question that the statute validly and clearly confers power upon the secretary of the treasury to issue a properly worded regulation making the acts of the appellees unlawful. this is made apparent by the district judge's statement that "[t]he secretary could very easily have indicated that east and west germany page 361 u. s. 454 ..... 41 cong.rec. 2819. it is manifest that the preoccupying thought of the primary promoter of the legislation, president roosevelt, and of congress, was to bar a single judge from destroying, either by way of construction or invalidation, congressional enactments. extension of the range of the meaning of "statute" to include regulations to which penal consequences attach .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1960 (HC)

Madras Motor Insurance Co. Ltd., Madras Vs. Mohamed Mustafa Badsha and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Mad208; (1960)2MLJ202

..... 2) etc. however, the receipt does not appear to have been properly proved, and the learned judge felt some difficulty in accepting and acting upon it. but, for purposes of the present argument, i shall assume that the car was actually sold on that dale, and that defendant 2 became ..... vesting in defendant 1 alone on the date o! the accident.3. learned counsel far the company, sri r. gopalaswaini aiyangar, argues that this conclusion of the learned judge is opposed to certain facts of the documentary record, such as the receipt dated 8-1-1951 (ex. b-4, issued by sukumar productions to n. ramakrishna (defendant ..... and negligent, and that it recited in the death of the son of the plaintiffs, aged about 13, entitling the plaintiffs to claim for heavy damages. the learned judge came to the conclusion that, for want of sufficient evidence, he could not hold that the sale was established. he therefore held that the facts amounted to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1960 (HC)

Advocate-general of Kerala Vs. thevar Tharakan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-17-1960

Reported in : 1961CriLJ109

..... a court or a judge of the court into contempt, or to lower his authority, is a contempt of court. that is one class of contempt. further any ..... act done or writing published calculated to obstruct or interfere with the due course of justice or the lawful process of the courts is a contempt of ..... as against the public, not the judge, an obstruction to public justice; and a libel on a judge, in order to constitute a contempt of court, must have been calculated to cause such an obstruction. 7. in bex v. gray, 1900 - 2 qb 36, lord russell, the then lord chief justice of england says:any act done or writing published calculated to bring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1960 (HC)

C.V. Venkataraman and anr. Vs. C.S. Lakshmi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Mad32; (1960)2MLJ157

..... is true that the inherent power of courts can always be invoked to furthsr the ends of justice, with due deference to the learned judge there are certainly limits to such power. to further the ends of justice we cannot grant a decree on a promissory note which has become ..... consent decree only an estate for life. the question no doubt depends upon the construction of section 14(2) of the act.but so far as we are aware, there is no provision in the code of civil procedure or anywhere else which warrants an application as ..... the case of the respondent that he-cause of the passing of the hindu succession act, 1956 that decree has become void. all that she says is that by reason of the provisions of that act she has become entitled absolutely to the property in which she had under the ..... 1. this appeal,must be allowed not on the merits but on the ground that the learned judge had no jurisdiction to grant a declaration such as that which he granted to the respondent on an application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1960 (HC)

Ninan Vs. Secretary, State Transport Authority, Trivandrum and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Ker359

..... ). in support of this argument reliance is placed on the division bench ruling in p. satyanarayana v. the state of andhra pradesh, air 1959 andh pra 429 and the single judge ruling in thomas v. state transport authority, 1960 ker lt 108: air 1960 kerala 111. 4. the condition that can be attached to a permit under clause (iv) of ..... regionaltransport authority. the delegation made to the secretary under rule 144 of the travancore-cochin motor vehicles rules framed in 1952 at a time when, under the provisions of the act as it then stood, this power of regulating timings was governed by section 48 (c)and the time table was not a condition of the permit, cannot operate with regard ..... no jurisdiction to alter the approved time table since, under the provisions of clauses (iii) and (iv) of sub-section (3) of section 48 of the motor vehicles act as amended by act c of 1956, the time table is one of the conditions of the permit which under clauses 20 and 21 of the same sub-section, can be varied only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1960 (HC)

Hambirrao Bhaurao Patil Vs. Balisha Ganpat Kamble

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-1960

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR749

..... mean as is contended by mr. sukthankar that the civil procedure code applies to the inquiry before the judge' under section 22 only to the extent as specified in section 22(2). in our view the inquiry contemplated under section 22 of the district municipal act is a judicial inquiry, the authority holding that inquiry is a judicial authority and the procedure prescribed by the civil procedure code in so ..... that the procedure prescribed by the civil procedure code is applicable to the inquiry before the district judge or the assistant judge, who is holding an inquiry on an election petition under section 22 of the district municipal act it does not follow, therefrom, that a party to the inquiry has a right to apply to the judge for a review of the decision given by him in an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1960 (SC)

Smt. Nagindra Bala Mitra and anr. Vs. Sunil Chandra Roy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-1960

Reported in : AIR1960SC706; 1960CriLJ1020; [1960]3SCR1

..... say that grievous hurt was only an aggravated form of hurt, and that the liability of the accused did not cease, if he committed an act which resulted in a simple hurt. indeed, the learned judge did not tell the jury that even if they held that the accused did not cause a grievous injury, it would be open to them ..... facts were compatible with his guilt. so far as this direction went, nothing can be said against it. the judge next proceeded to explain what was meant by the expression 'fact proved'. he paraphrased the definition of 'proved' from the evidence act. in dealing with this topic, he omitted to explain also the expressions 'disproved' and 'not proved'; but that ..... unjustified or that he wrongly influenced the jury against the witness. it must be stated here that the learned judge had cautioned the jury that they were not bound by his opinion on a question of fact and were free to act on their own opinion. 24. this brings us to the medical evidence. the two doctors of importance who .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //