Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-05-1960
Reported in : AIR1960Ker327
..... contend, that article 14 hits even a notification by government; but the notification which was attacked, had the force of law having been issued under s, 3 of the commissionsof inquiry act, 1952. i therefore hold, that the argument based on article 14 cannot prevail. 7. lastly, the point was raised, that respondents 1 and 2 had no jurisdiction to pass the ..... and instructions. a similar view was taken of the travancore education code in t. m. dasius v. state, 1956 ker lt 238 : (air 1957 trav-co. 214) where the learned judge observed as follows : 'it is not a legislative enactment nor has it the force of a statute and it does not confer any right on private school teachers. orders of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-05-1960
Reported in : (1962)IILLJ549Cal
..... on the corporation to make regulations imposing a duty on the corporation to hold a judicial or a quasi-judicial inquiry into the charges of misconduct of its officers. there was, therefore, no duty either express or implied, to act in accordance with the provisions of article 311 in matters of dismissal of its employees and a writ could not ..... act, in this case, the u.p. district boards act, 1922. it was only from this point of view that the learned judge held that officers of a district board were 'in a sense government servants' or 'something akin to such ..... anr. : air1938all276 . in that case, harries, j., stated that in his view, officers of district boards were public officials and were 'in a sense government servants.' the learned judge held that the officers of district boards were part of the machinery of self-government, as provided under the local self government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-04-1960
Reported in : AIR1960Cal582,64CWN861
..... be interfered with in appeal. on this particularquestion, the position in law is well-settled. it is true that ordinarily, the discretion, exercised bythe learned trial judge, is not, --and is not tobe --interfered with in appeal. but that rule isnot an absolute one and it has its exceptions. thelaw on the point ..... the case of brojo gopal roy v. amar chandra : air1929cal214 and the subsequent bench decision in the case of : air1935cal35 , in which latter case, the learned judges characterised couch c. j.'s definition as 'antiquated' and pleaded for a broader and more liberal and progressive outlook.14. the supreme court, also, in the case ..... of this decision is challenged in this appeal.27. what, indeed, was meant by the learned judge by the expression 'temporary licence' is not very clear. under the act in question, namely, the west bengal cinemas (regulation) act, 1954, (west bengal act xxxix of 1954), and the relevant rules, framed thereunder, namely, the west bengal cinemas (regulation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-01-1960
Reported in : AIR1960All672
..... that the supreme court should not make any pronouncement on any question which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the particular case before it.thus the judges of the supreme court arc, if i may say so again with profound respect, conscious that any pronouncement of law by the court acquires 'potency' under ..... for examp]e, may do things for another without incurring any contractual obligation. the word 'agency'' in the dictionary has a wider import than under the contract act. the question is whether the supreme court used the word 'agent'' in the sense of any contractual relationship or only to indicate that the money is collected ..... any manner liable for the loss of the packet or its contents. nevertheless, subject to certain rules, and within certain limits, the postmaster-general voluntarily and as an act of grace pays compensation, according to a published scale, for loss of, or damage to, registered packets, parcels, and express packets, and certain insured imperial and .....
Tag this Judgment!