Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 94 of about 6,838 results (1.008 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

K M Shivalinge Gowda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Anand Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr Irfan Razack Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt M Mamatha Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Smitha Uday Kumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Sathish Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

V R Swamy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt.r. Vasanthamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Nagaraj Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

H B Srinivasamurthy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //