Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These writ appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in W.P. No. 58103/2015 dated 2.3.2016.) 1. These writ appeals are preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 2nd of March, 2016 in W.P.No.58103/2015 dismissing the writ petition preferred by the appellant as not maintainable and consequently dismissing five interlocutory applications which were listed before him on that day. 2. The appellant is presently the incumbent Upa-Lokayukta in the State of Karnataka. His case is after a span of over 20 years of law practice, he was appointed as a Judge of the Karnataka High Court in the year 2006. He was appointed as Upa-Lokayukta in the year 2013 under the provisions of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 (for short hereinafter referred as the Act ) and he continues to hold the said office since then. 3. It is his further case that a notice of motion signed by 78 members of the Karnataka Legislative ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF APRIL2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT APPEAL Nos.599 600/2016 (GMRES) BETWEEN : Justice Subhash B. Adi, S/o Late Shri Bashetty Adi, Age 64 years, R/at:94. A, 9th Cross, 10th Main, R.M.V.Extension, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore-560 080. ...APPELLANT (By Sri B.V.Acharya, Senior Counsel, a/w Sri Ashok B Patil, Adv.) AND :1. 2. The Secretary, Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore 560 233. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Public Administrative 2 Reforms, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore 560 233. RESPONDENTS (By Sri Madhusudhan R Naik, Advocate General, a/w Sri D.Nagaraj, AGA) . . . . These writ appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in W.P. No.58103/2015 dated 2.3.2016. this day, N.Kumar J., delivered the following: These writ appeals coming on for prelimina...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the communication bearing No.D.O.No.KLAS/Sec/Lok/31/2015-16 dated 03.12.2015 issued by the first respondent vide Annexure-'A' and etc.) 1. This case was listed today in the category of orders for dealing with five interlocutory applications, out of which, four have been filed the by the petitioner, and I.A.-4/2016, for impleadment, has been filed by Mr.K.V.Dhananjay, the learned counsel for petitioner. 2. But even before this court could deal with these interlocutory applications, Mr.Madhusudhan R. Naik, the learned Advocate General, has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the writ petition itself before this court. Therefore, before dealing with the interlocutory applications, with the consent of the learned counsel for parties, this court proceeds to deal with the preliminary objection raised by the Advocate General. 3. Mr.Madhusudhan R. Naik, the lear...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Dr. Bhakthavatsala, J1. The petitioner, who was the former Chief Minister (BJP) of the State of Karnataka, is before this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for the following reliefs:(i) to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the Complaint dated 22.8.2011 filed by the 3rd respondent/Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore, against him for the offences under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, at Annexure-A;(ii) to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the FIR registered in Crime No.36/2011 against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Annexure-A-1;(iii) to quash the Order of Sanction dated 2.8.2011 for initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioner at Annexure-B on the file of Governor of Karnataka;(iv) to quash the relevant portion of the Report at chapter 22 of Lokayukta dated 27.7....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 16th day of April, 2015 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA C.C.C. (CRIMINAL) No.20/2009 BETWEEN: High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, Rep. by Registrar General. COMPLAINANT AND:1. 2. (By Sri M.Narayana Reddy, SPP.) Sri Jai Chaitanya Dasa @ Jayanarayana K., 42 years, S/o Mr.K.C.D.Nambisan, Secretary of International Society for Krishna Consciousness, A Society Reg. under Karnataka Society Reg. Act 1960, & claming to have its Reg. office at Hare Krishna Hill, Chord Road, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru City 10. Sri Madhu Pandit Das, President of International Society for Krishna Consciousness, A Society Reg. under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 & claiming to have it Reg. office at Hare Krishna Hill, Chord Road, Rajajinagar, Bangalore 10.3. 4.5. 6.-. 2 - Sri S.K.V.Chalapathi, Senior Counsel, No.21/22, II Floor, Krishna Towers, 3rd Main Road, Gandhinagar Bangalore 560 009. Sri V...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA MFA NO.24969/2013 (MV) BETWEEN1 SMT. SAROJINI RAMAPPA DHAVALI, AGE:46. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BANASHANKARI NAGAR, KHASABAG, BELAGAVI.2. SRI RAMAPPA VEERAPPA DHAVALI, AGE:51. YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O BANASHANKARI NAGAR, KHASABAG, BELAGAVI. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE) AND1 SRI PARASHURAM DURGAPPA ANKALAGI, AGE:31. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. AT/PT; SANTIBASTWAD, 1ST BUS STAND, TQ. & DIST: BELAGAVI :2. :2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MUDALAGI BUILDING, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT PREETHI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THE AND JUDGEMENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF THE M.V.ACT, AGAINST AWARD DTD:30.07.2013, PASSED IN MVC NO.2503/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(This MFA is filed u/s. 173(1) of the M.V. Act, against the judgment and award dtd:30.07.2013, passed in MVC No.2503/2012 on the file of the VI Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed by the parents of the deceased-Ravindra for enhancement against the judgment and award dated 30.07.2013 made in MVC No. 2503/2012 on the file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi awarding Rs.2,82,000/-together with costs and interest at 7% per annum from the date of petition till realisation of the entire amount. 2. The claimants are the parents of the deceased-Ravindra, who on 10.10.2009 at about 23.30 hours when proceeding on motor cycle bearing No.KA- 22/X-3473 on Gokul Road near bus stand Hubli in a moderate speed, met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of an unknown auto rickshaw. Thereby the deceased sustained inj...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside/quash the appointment of respondent No.3 as Upa Lok Ayukta and direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to appoint a Upa Lok Ayukta after following the mandate in Section 3(2)(b) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 within a time frame as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and etc.,) 1. These two writ petitions are filed by two advocates challenging the appointment of Mr. Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retired) as Upa-Lokayukta under Section 3(2)(b) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984. They are taken up for consideration together and disposed of by this common order. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed to in Writ Petition Nos.4852-53/2012. FACTUAL MATRIX 3. One Sri. Janekere C. Krishna, an Advocate is the Petitioner in W.P.No.4852-53/2012, whereas Sri. Ananda Murthy R., an Advocate, is the petitioner in W.P.No.4962/2012. They have pleaded...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR587
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. The first two Writ Petitions are public interest petitions, in which the petitioners have challenged the legality of an order of the State Government under which contract for bottling Arrack was granted to respondents 3 to 10 on the ground that a largess involving a total turnover of Rs. 50 crores had been granted to them, in flagrant violation of law and on collateral consideration. In the other petitions the petitioners therein have questioned the legality of the same Government order.2. The background and history of the cases are as follows : (i) Pursuant to the decision of the Government that arrack should be supplied to the consumers in sealed bottles or sachets, to avoid the possibility of adulteration, on 11th April, 1984, the Excise Commissioner invited applications from persons interested in undertaking the bottling of arrack at 18 places in the State most of which are District head quarters. The applicants were required to furnish their names and addresse...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1953Kant156; AIR1953Mys156; ILR1953KAR440; (1954)32MysLJ12
Venkataramaiya, J.1. These are three petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writs in the nature of Mandamus, certiorari or appropriate directions to the Government of Mysore on grounds which are substantially the same. These were heard together and may be conveniently disposed of by one order as the principal question raised in it whether Government can review orders regarding grant of agricultural lands. The facts which may be taken as undisputed are that the Petitioner in C. P. 155 of 51-52 was granted 3 acres in S. NO. 24 in Narsipur village, Arsikara Taluk, Hassan District on payment of Rs. 75/-, the appeal preferred by some persons to the Revenue Commissioner objecting to the grant was dismissed on 27-11-1944, that Government also dismissed on 22-2-1946 the appeal filed against the order of the Revenue Commissioner, that the application filed subsequently for review of the order was rejected by Government on 21-12-1949 but on a second petition ...
Tag this Judgment!