870 Judges Inquiry Act 1968 Section 5 Powers of Committee - Sortby Recent - Court Karnataka - Page 87 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 87 of about 6,910 results (1.217 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Francis George Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Krishnadeveraya Education Trust Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A M Prakash Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Bhaskara Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Manjunath Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Vinayaka Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

K Ravindra Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. A S Nirmala Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Mahaboob Sab Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri D R Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vigilance and monitoring of individual cases and this can be done by screening of the cases by a suitable machinery at a high level. it is reported that in some states, after the decision of this court in kartar singh, high-powered committees have been constituted for screening all such cases. it is hoped that this action will be taken in all the states throughout the country. persons aware of instances of abuse, including the national human rights commission, ..... cognizance. hence, he contends that it cannot be canvassed that the power vested under section 9(1) of the act is without any procedure. he would further submit that special court is headed for the present by a retired judge of this hon'ble court and as such, it cannot be said 378 that power of taking suo motu cognizance would not be exercised cautiously. 5.8 he would contend that in order to remedy/curb ..... t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka. 33.civil appeal no.1948/1968 (d.d. 23.11.1968) : m. maniklal vs. state of mysore. 34.rsa no.867/2011 (d.d. 29.09.2015): v. narayanaswamy vs. city municipal council and others. 35.air2001sc2472 shyam sundar and others vs. ..... meaning. nor can light as to the meaning be gained from the section as a whole or the article of the penal law under which it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //