Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Sep-10-2018
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS10T H THE DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT APPEAL No.100295 OF2018[LA-RES]. BETWEEN SRI. BIMAL S/O. KANTILAL MEHATA, AGE.54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O GOKUL ROAD, TQ. HUBLI DIST. DHARWAD. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. A. S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, DAHRWAD. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, SOUTH-WESTERN RAILWAYS, KESHWARPUR, HUBALI. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE.2.3. (BY SRI. RAVI V. HOSAMANI, AGA., FOR R1 & R3; ... RESPONDENTS :2. : SRI. CHETAN T LIMBIKAI, ADV., FOR SRI AJAY U. PATIL, ADV., FOR R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:20.03.2018, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.101731/2018 (LA-RES) BY A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-26-2018
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF JULY2018BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.654 OF2018BETWEEN Sri. Theethira N. Appachu @ Titira N.Appachu, Son of T.M.Nanjappa, Aged 48 years, Electrical Engineer, Bengaluru East No.307, Office of the Sub-Divisional Electrical Engineer, 18th Cross, 6th Main Road, Malleswaram, Bengaluru-560020. Presently Working as: Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector, Bengaluru South Circle, No.53/2, 2nd Floor, Behind Sri. Nijaguna Kshetra, Bull Temple Road, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru-560019. Residing at No.32, 36th Cross, 19th Main, 5th Block, HBR Layout, Bengaluru-560043. (By Sri. Venkatesh C Sharma, Advocate) AND Petitioner 2 State of Karnataka, Rep. by Police Inspector, Karnataka Lokayukta Police, City Wing, Bengaluru-560001. (By Sri. Venkatesh S Arabatti, Spl.P.P.) Respondent This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code praying t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-11-2018
CRL. RP. No.2051/2011 :1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF JUNE, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE DR.JUSTICE H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.2051/2011 BETWEEN: MOULASAB S/O. HASANSAB KARANACHI, AGE35 R/O. SORATUR, TQ. GADAG, DIST. GADAG. (BY SRI. NEELENDRA D. GUNDE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY NORTH TRAFFIC P.S., HUBLI, REPTD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-01 ... PETITIONER (SRI RAJA RAGHAVENDRA NAIK, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT) ... RESPONDENT DHARWAD, THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED3112.2010 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, IN CRL.A.NO.12/2010, THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER PASSED BY THE LEARNED JMFC-I, HUBLI IN THEREBY CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION279 304A OF IPC AND U/S. 134 R/W. 187 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Mar-05-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF MARCH, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL M.F.A.NO.23745/2010 (MV) c/w M.F.A.CROB.NO.100195/2014 (MV) IN M.F.A.NO.23745/2010 (MV): BETWEEN: NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, GULBARGA, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, MISS. RENUKA Y. RANEBENNUR, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SUJATA COMPLEX, HUBLI (BY SRI LAXMAN B. MANNODDAR, ADVOCATE) AND1 SMT. GOUSIA W/O KHAJASAB, AGE:42. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.2. TASLEEMA BEGUM D/O KHAJASAB, AGE:14. YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER/PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. GOUSIA W/O KHAJASAB, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL. ... APPELLANT23. HAJRAT HUSSEIN S/O KHAJASAB, AGE:23. YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.4. SMT. RUBIYA W/O KHASIMSAB AGE:67. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.5. CHIKK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Mar-05-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF MARCH, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL M.F.A.NO.23745/2010 (MV) c/w M.F.A.CROB.NO.100195/2014 (MV) IN M.F.A.NO.23745/2010 (MV): BETWEEN: NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, GULBARGA, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, MISS. RENUKA Y. RANEBENNUR, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SUJATA COMPLEX, HUBLI (BY SRI LAXMAN B. MANNODDAR, ADVOCATE) AND1 SMT. GOUSIA W/O KHAJASAB, AGE:42. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.2. TASLEEMA BEGUM D/O KHAJASAB, AGE:14. YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER/PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. GOUSIA W/O KHAJASAB, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL. ... APPELLANT23. HAJRAT HUSSEIN S/O KHAJASAB, AGE:23. YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.4. SMT. RUBIYA W/O KHASIMSAB AGE:67. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL.5. CHIKK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
1/10 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16h DAY OF FEBRUARY2018BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI M.F.A.No.5503/2016 (AA) BETWEEN: RADIANT INFO SYSTEMS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT22271 DIV. NO.52A, 9TH MAIN, BSK II STAGE BANGALORE560070. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. MALLIKARJUN PRASAD. ... APPELLANT (By Mr. K. ARUN KUMAR, ADV., FOR M/S. CREST LAW PARTNERS, ADVS.,) AND: THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION A STATUTORY CORPORATION HAVING ITS OFFICE AT POST BAG NO.2778, K.H. ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 AND HEREIN REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ... RESPONDENT (By Mr. P. DHANANJAYA, ADV., FOR Mr. P.D. SURANA, ADV.,) THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION37 RULE (1)(b) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 R/W ORDER43OF THE CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:30.7.2016 PASSED IN A.A.NO.25006/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE28H ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-19-2018
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR MFA No.202/2016 (MV) SMT. SAKAMMA, NOW AGED ABOUT29YEARS, W/O LATE SHIVANNA, VENUGOPAL, NOW AGED ABOUT5YEARS, S/O LATE SHIVANNA, KUM. BHUVANA, D/O LATE SHIVANNA, NOW AGED ABOUT3 YEARS, SINCE THE APPELLANT NOS.2 AND3ARE MINORS, ARE REP. BY THEIR MOTHER I.E., APPELLANT NO.1 SMT. SAKAMMA, BETWEEN1 2.3. 4.5. SRI. BHUTHANNA, NOW AGED ABOUT51YEARS, S/O LATE MUDALAGIRIYAPPA, SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, NOW AGED ABOUT49YEARS, W/O BHUTHANNA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT No.289, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, MANJUNATHANAGAR, :2. : BAGALGUNTE, BENGALURU 73. ... APPELLANTS SRI. G.C. SURESH, S/O G.M. CHANDRAPPA, AGED MAJOR, NO.1, KHM BLOCK, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, R.T.NAGAR, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU 560 032. (BY SRI. MANMOHAN D., ADVOCATE) AND1 2. M/S. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, No.144, 2ND FLOOR, SUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001. REP. BY ITS MANAGER. ... RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-06-2018
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF JULY2018BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.426/2013 (RCT) BETWEEN1 Mrs. SULOCHANAMMA W/O LATE THIPPAREDDY AGED ABOUT56YEARS2 Mr. K T BUPALAREDDI S/O LATE THIPPAREDDY AGED ABOUT26YEARS3 Mrs. MANJULA W/O THIMMAREDDY AGED ABOUT26YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF No.71, KONGARAHALLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI TANVEER PASHA A.S, ADVOCATE) AND UNION OF INDIA SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, HUBLI REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (BY SRI SATISH KUMAR.N, ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT - 2 - TRIBUNAL ACT, AGAINST THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION231) OF RAILWAY CLAIMS JUDGMENT DATED:30.11.2012 PASSED IN OA II U1142011 ON THE FILE OF THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE CLAIM APPLICATION UNDER SECTION16OF THE RAILWAYS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT, 1987. THE THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Thou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Feb-28-2018
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT MFA NO.20607 OF2010(MV) BETWEEN DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO, LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ENKAY COMPLEX, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI. (By SRI. C.V.ANGADI, ADV. ) AND ... APPELLANT12 3 4.5. VEERABHADRAPPA S/O. CHANVEERAPPA BADIGER, SINCE DECEASED BY L.RS. WHO ARE ALREADY ON RECORD AS RESPONDENT NOS.3, 4 & 5. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. VEERABHADRAPPA BADIGER, SINCE DECEASED BY L.RS.WHO ARE ALREADY RESPONDENT NOS.3, 4 & 5. KUMARI DYAMAVVA D/O. VEERABHADRAPPA BADIGER, AGE NOW ABOUT27YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HOSAHALASUR, TQ. SAVANUR. KUMARI SHIVALEELA D/O. VEERABHADRAPPA BADIGER, AGE NOW ABOUT25YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HOSAHALASUR, TQ. SAVANUR, KUMARI KAVITA D/O. VEERABHADRAPPA BADIGER, AGE NOW ABOUT21YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOSAHALASUR, TQ. SAVANUR. 2 6. CHANNAPPA BASAVANNEPPA KARILINGANNAVAR, AGE MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. HAVERI, TQ. H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-10-2018
..... inquiry act, 1952 clearly indicate that section 21 of the general clauses act, 1897 (central act) could not be invoked to enlarge the power to reconstitute the commission constituted under section 3 of the act in a manner other than that expressly provided in the commissions of inquiry act. there being no express power given by the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 to the appropriate government to reconstitute the commission of inquiry constituted under section 3 of the act by replacement or substitution of its sole member and the existence of any such power being negatived by clear implication, no such power ..... v)two upadivantas of gokarna temple to be nominated by the deputy commissioner in consultation with the state government members. the overseeing committee shall ensure that the traditions of the temple are maintained, amenities and facilities are provided to the devotees and the upadivantas/archaks are accredited. hon ble shri. justice b.n. srikrishna, former judge, supreme court of india is requested to be the advisor of the said committee. ..... would not be really material whether the exercise of power was in good faith or in bad faith. padfield vs. minister of agriculture & fisheries [(1968)1 all er694 is a locus classicus on the concept of improper purpose in the realm of administrative law. the said case demonstrates that a minister is subject to judicial control for the exercise of his discretionary power in addition to his constitutional responsibility to the legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!