Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 preamble 1 judges inquiry act 1968 Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 9 of about 3,814 results (0.186 seconds)

Maheshwari Agro Industries Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

..... be supplied to the chairman, central board of direct taxes, new delhi for information and necessary action. 31. in the land mark decision delivered on 11.03.1968, the three judges bench of honble supreme court in the case of m.k. mohammed kunhi (supra), in unanimous opinion authored by grover, j, dealing with words ..... commission abates under section 245ha, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and other information produced by the assessee before, or the results of the inquiry held or evidence recorded by, the settlement commission, in the course of the proceeding before it and such other material as may be brought on his record, ..... tax liability, it should be completely stayed during the pendency of the first appeal. he also submitted that while various other fiscal statutes like central excise act, customs act and various sales tax laws of the state, contain the provision for pre-deposit of certain portion of disputed demand of tax raised by the assessing authority .....

Madan Lal and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1430

..... they are facing a trial for offences under sections 364, 302, 120-b ipc and under sections 3/25, 5/25, and 27 of the arms act before the additional district and sessions judge, kishangarh. 3. the said case has generated much heat and dust in the area. according to the petitioners, when they attend the trial, they find ..... the transfer of a case within the state under section 407 and anywhere in the country under section 406 crpc. the apprehension of not getting a fair and impartial inquiry or trial is required to be reasonable and not imaginary, based upon conjectures and surmises. if it appears that the dispensation of criminal justice is not possible impartially ..... lord denning, m.r. had opined in the case of metropolitan properties co. ltd v lannon [(1968) 3 all er 304 (ca)] that, justice must be rooted in confidence; and confidence is destroyed when right-minded people go away thinking: the judge was biased. it is trite to state that judiciary runs on the wheels of faith of the .....

Ramlal @ Habudia Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2012CrLJ240(NOC)

..... for an offence punishable under section 302 indian penal code. the investigating agency after concluding the investigation submitted its report to the competent court. learned additional sessions judge, gulabpura camp shahpura framed the charge against the accused and on denial of the same trial commenced. the prosecution during the course of trial supported its ..... ) that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to establish guilt of the accused appellant. (2) even on acceptance of the prosecution case absolutely, the act of the accused appellant does not travel beyond the offence punishable under section 304 part-i indian penal code. we have considered the arguments advanced and also the ..... given one grievous injury. the accused was having axe in his hands, thus, he would have any intention to kill sanwara, he would have repeated his act. the accused must be having a knowledge that the bodily injury given by him by sharp edged weapon like axe may cause death, but was not intending .....

Shree Cement Limited and anr Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... principles of promissory estoppel which werefirst unequivocably propounded by the honble supreme court in the case of union of india v/s indo-afghan agencies reported in air 1968 sc 718, were further concretized and glorified in the celebrated judgment of honble justice p.n. bhagwati in the case of m/s motilal padampat sugar mill ..... one reasons. firstly, rips 2003 is an executive policy decision of the state government involved here in this case; whereas upon enactment of u.p. electricity reforms act, 1999, uniform tariffs for supply of electricity were introduced in the case before the apex court and thus obviously principle of promissory estoppel were held not applicable ..... 2) scc 777, the honble supreme court in the aforesaid case held as under: the two judge bench in sant steels case, (2008) 2 scc 777 was of the view that notification issued under section 49 of the 1948 act can be revoked/modified only if express provision was made for the revocation/modification of the said notification .....

Jodhpur Development Autho., Jodhpur Vs. State Consumer Disp. Red. Foru ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... handed over to him. compensation of rs. 53,000/- was also awarded in favour of complainant and the divisional commissioner respondent no. 3 was directed to hold inquiry against the responsible officers and employees of uit, jodhpur for deficiency in service and recover such s.b.civil writ petition no. 11316/2010 & 11 other connected ..... argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is accepted it leads to taking away the additional remedies and forums expressly provided under the 1986 act, which is not acceptable. dhulabhai v. state of m.p., (1968) 3 scr 662 : air 1969 sc 78, explained and distinguished. chairman, thiruvalluvar transport corpn. v. consumer protection council. (1995) 2 ..... as well as legal obligation to do so under section 67 of the jda act, 2009 as well as under the old uit act.(iii)mr. himanshu maheshwari also submitted that in otherwrit petitions also in pil jurisdiction as well as learned single judge of this court have directed time and again the petitioner jda/ uit to .....

Dinesh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

..... record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made. (emphasis supplied) 26. such a factual situation has been considered by this ..... antar singh v. state of madhya pradesh 2007 (1) crimes 226 that whether in a given situation, accused persons had shared common intention to commit murder must be judged having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. in the aforesaid case, all the accused persons were held liable for the offences as they went inside the ..... may be inferred from circumstances and conduct. prior concert or prior plan of the accused has to be judged from the facts and circumstances of the case as direct evidence in respect thereof is difficult to come by. only the acts of the parties will make out the intention and so, this factual aspect is to be inferred from .....

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either [imprisonment for life], or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned.attempts by life convicts. - [when any person offending under this ..... the charge-sheet submitted by the petitioner.section 307 ipc reads as under :-307. attempt to murder.- whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances, that if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may ..... by the order dated 01.03.2011 passed by the additional sessions judge (fast track) no.1, beawar, district ajmer, whereby the learned judge has framed the charges for offences under sections 148, 323, 325, 326, 307 read with section 149 ipc and 4/25 arms act, the petitioner has approached this court. the learned counsel for the petitioner .....

Om Prakash Saini. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , the state government shall draw up a statement setting out distinctly the charge against the member and shall send the same for inquiry and findings by judicial officer of the rank of a district judge to be appointed by the state government for the purpose.(3) the judicial officer so appointed shall proceed to inquire into the ..... revoked vide order dated 21.01.1993, it would not pre-empt the government from re-opining the entire case. furthermore, section 63a of the act empowers the government to hold an inquiry for any misconduct committed in an earlier term. thus, he has justified the impugned charge-sheet.8. in rejoinder, mr. gupta has contended that ..... faith in the rule of law. therefore, repeatedly the hon'ble supreme court has stressed that every action of the state must be just, fair and reasonable. any act which is unjust, unfair, or unreasonable is an anathema to the constitutional mandate and to the constitutional philosophy of this country.10. while keeping these two principles in .....

Rajesh Kumar. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , as defined in section 319 cr.p.c., had occurred. therefore, the case would prima facie fall within the latter part of section 307 ipc. hence, the learned judge was certainly justified in framing the charge for the said offence.7. hence, this court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. this petition, being ..... to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine, and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either to [imprisonment for life], or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned. attempts by life convicts.- when any person offending under ..... parties and perused the impugned order. section 307 ipc is as under : section 307. attempt to murder6. whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty or murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend .....

Jai Prakash @ Sunny and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... of her parents, she was saved. after a thorough investigation, the police submitted a charge-sheet for the aforementioned offence. vide order dated 21.02.2011, the learned judge framed the charges for the aforementioned offences.3. hence, this petition before this court. mr. ashvin garg, the learned counsel for the petitioners, has vehemently contended that the ..... to see if a strong prima facie case is made out against the accused-person or not.5. at the time of framing of the charges, the learned judge cannot go into meticulous examination of the evidence produced by the prosecution. in the present case, although the learned counsel has pleaded that the story narrated by the ..... framing of a charge, for offence under section 307 ipc, what the court is concerned about is to see if an act was committed with an intention or knowledge under such circumstances that by such an act death would be caused, or not according to the complainant, the petitioners had tried to hang her, but luckily she was .....